> tbjbj 4(tEEEEEYYYY$}Y0$kF>E>EES
EEpbF}Yi0Ed>>: Laptops and High-quality Education for Every ChildPart 2
How to achieve high-quality education at a national scale?
Part 1 of this essay emphasized providing all children with a high-quality education as their basic human right, and the role of connected laptops as the best tool to enable it.
As digital inclusion expands, the practical question becomes: how do we go from the current educational system to one that provides the highest-quality learning experience for every child in the country? How can whole families benefit and the whole community become the site for learning?
Incremental Change is Insufficient
It is generally accepted that education in Rwanda needs real transformation in order to meet the goals of Rwanda2020. There are on average 50 pupils for every teacher. The teachers themselves typically have received minimal education. There are not quality texts for every child for every subject.
A 10% yearly improvement is typically viewed as spectacular, yet it would be woefully inadequate. If 10% annual improvement were achieved only in the student-teacher ratio, it would take 7 years to achieve preferred ratios. However, the cost of implementation would require twice as many teachers and classrooms, at a huge cost. This does not even take into account the issues of quality, materials, training, etc. Naturally, achieving better student-teacher ratios is desirable, but as a means for overall systemic transformation it is thoroughly insufficient.
Textbooks are another salient example where incremental improvement would fall short. In most countries texts are often obsolete, not of the highest quality, and not readily available in all subjects for all children. The texts are created and produced outside the country. The cost of purchase and distribution is high.
Rather than incrementally distributing more texts, by providing digitized materials to all children on their connected laptops, one not only diminishes the overall costs dramatically, one also upgrades the quality and relevance of the materials. Moreover, more locally created materials can be produced and provided.
The needs to bring Rwanda to existing international norms are daunting. Rather than struggle to incrementally improve, the best strategy is to jump ahead.
The Mathematics of Computer Usage in Schools
When thinking of bringing computers to schools, the first tendency is to try to maximize access: how to give every child a chance to touch a computer. The underlying principle of equity is noble. However, if the overall goal is high-quality education for all, then what must be maximized is not immediate, low-impact access for the most children in the fastest time, but the best initial actions that enable the greatest transformation of quality for all children in the shortest time.
If there are 1200 children in a school, and 12 computers in the school laboratory; and there are 5 hours in the school day; then on average each child will have 3 minutes of access to a computer per day. Creating labs of 12 computers for every school will cost millions of dollars. However, the impact of 3 minutes per day for children will be minimal.
The essential school disciplines of reading, writing, mathematics, science, history, and language will not be able to utilize the computers in meaningful ways with so little access. Minimal access deprives the system of advances in its core subjects. Even doubling, tripling, or quadrupling the access by adding a few more computers per school will not make the necessary impact. The point is not that computers cannot be valuable: it is that low-density access occurring only in schools is the wrong model to enable the required development.
The experience of labs in other countries demonstrates this. While there are clear benefits to children gaining some access to computers, one witnesses neither the systemic transformation nor the individual development at national scales.
Saturation, Spread and Systemic Change
A child spends about 4 hours per day in class. That means they have about 12 waking hours outside of school. When children take their laptops home with them, they spend many more hours reading and writing; researching; helping their families; and participating in rich activities. They have an entry to mathematical and computational thinking. They become citizens of the modern world.
The more time- and cost-effective path to systemic transformation and quality education for all children is to concentrate district by district, enabling true reform, and growing from success. As the first districts lead, the subsequent districts will learn faster. With saturation and laptops going with children into their homes and communities, Rwanda will lead the world in developing an educational system for the 21st century.
Part 3 of this essay will outline the types of educational activities with connected laptops that will help move Rwanda to the forefront of modern education.
9:uv & ' ( ) , = H k n I
J
K
n
-7̸̼̰h]thh)hB!hSfUh-`h;oh;o6h;ohhhcch?chhhY5h|rh.Djh!dh9hthK.hg
hVVhP=Ah5h;oh56 h5hx'h52:uv( ) J
K
n
OPdeuv gd#$)08hqrx
8
o
x
"6,89>fNO hQ/2hQ/26 h7)6hQ/2h7)6 h6h`Eh0hdwhfhSfUh2h)hA[Hhh^hcchdh]th9hZhh,l@ (K]ADWau 2L_uv+0!*Boy;ǿǿǻǻǻǻǻǻǷhh=jRh?hhhhnB
hnB
6hY5h:Kh-OhB!h4hAyhB!h5hh
h7)h7)h7)hPhQ/2hQ/2hQ/26 h6: !rstgd1rsthsnhT h
hZhnB
hhhH*21h:pT / =!"#$%j666666666vvvvvvvvv666666>6666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666hH6666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666662 0@P`p2( 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p8XV~ OJPJQJ_HmH nH sH tH @`@NormalCJ_HaJmH sH tH DA D
Default Paragraph FontRiR0Table Normal4
l4a(k (
0No ListPK![Content_Types].xmlj0Eжr(Iw},-j4 wP-t#bΙ{UTU^hd}㨫)*1P' ^W0)T9<l#$yi};~@(Hu*Dנz/0ǰ$X3aZ,D0j~3߶b~i>3\`?/[G\!-Rk.sԻ..a濭?PK!֧6_rels/.relsj0}Q%v/C/}(h"O
= C?hv=Ʌ%[xp{۵_Pѣ<1H0ORBdJE4b$q_6LR7`0̞O,En7Lib/SeеPK!kytheme/theme/themeManager.xmlM
@}w7c(EbˮCAǠҟ7՛K
Y,
e.|,H,lxɴIsQ}#Ր ֵ+!,^$j=GW)E+&
8PK!\theme/theme/theme1.xmlYOoE#F{o'NDuر i-q;N3'
G$$DAč*iEP~wq4;{o?g^;N:$BR64Mvsi-@R4mUb V*XX!cyg$w.Q"@oWL8*Bycjđ0蠦r,[LC9VbX*x_yuoBL͐u_.DKfN1엓:+ۥ~`jn[Zp֖zg,tV@bW/Oټl6Ws[R?S֒7 _כ[֪7 _w]ŌShN'^Bxk_[dC]zOլ\K=.:@MgdCf/o\ycB95B24SCEL|gO'sקo>W=n#p̰ZN|ӪV:8z1fk;ڇcp7#z8]Y/\{t\}}spķ=ʠoRVL3N(B<|ݥuK>P.EMLhɦM .co;əmr"*0#̡=6Kր0i1;$P0!YݩjbiXJB5IgAФa6{P g֢)҉-Ìq8RmcWyXg/u]6Q_Ê5H
Z2PU]Ǽ"GGFbCSOD%,p
6ޚwq̲R_gJSbj9)ed(w:/ak;6jAq11_xzG~F<:ɮ>O&kNa4dht\?J&l O٠NRpwhpse)tp)af]
27n}mk]\S,+a2g^Az
)˙>E
G鿰L7)'PK!
ѐ'theme/theme/_rels/themeManager.xml.relsM
0wooӺ&݈Э5
6?$Q
,.aic21h:qm@RN;d`o7gK(M&$R(.1r'JЊT8V"AȻHu}|$b{P8g/]QAsم(#L[PK-![Content_Types].xmlPK-!֧6+_rels/.relsPK-!kytheme/theme/themeManager.xmlPK-!\theme/theme/theme1.xmlPK-!
ѐ'
theme/theme/_rels/themeManager.xml.relsPK]
t( t tL#AA@0(
B
S ?v*2v3S9nB
T VV`Edw?B!Jg!)%7)K.Q/2(?EA[H-OPX1Q=jRSfUe\Ll]^-`ccd,f.Dj,lsn;o|rt]twY{0{~HO4)g
:K'U9Y5#%!dAyKqoA
2Z?cV
7
nf@sK0pi9hHOtv@t@UnknownG* Times New Roman5Symbol3.* Arial7K@CambriaA BCambria Math"h$&$& # #!hh20kk:HP$P2!xx
David Cavallo Oh+'0
(
4@HPX`David CavalloNormal 2Microsoft Office Word@F#@XMx@XMxGdVT$mH
h&" WMFC8 ulVT$m EMFVWh0P.
%%Rp@Cambriaa 8a a a O`2a a a a O`2a a jEU1a a |>FU1
X$7K@Cambri`՟`2DJ\>Ia PM1a a =RK1,a |>dv%%%Rp @Cambriaa a O`2a a a a O`2a a jEU1a a |>FU1
X7K@Cambri``2DJ\>Ia PM1a a =RK1,a |>dvdv%Rp@Cambria|>FU1
Xa |#a A|h]||a @wH
!R#_8XX
P a .#"la |##|a a Twwdv%(Rp @Cambria|#a A|h]||a @w R#a |#a A|h|a @+Tmr@)@mLpdigital inclusion71"18,7+58TT,r@)@LP T-r@)@-
L`expands, t108187+"T
r@)@#Lhe practical question becomes: how 718)1,",1771*"5871,5S1+75MT`
ir@)@
LTdo 75Tjr@)@jLlwe go from the&" WMFC U M115)6S"71Tx-vr@)@aL\current,7))18"TT.Cvr@)@.aLP TD6vr@)@DaLdeducational177,1"581TT7Lvr@)@7aLP TpM{vr@)@MaLXsystem+2,"1STT|vr@)@|aLP TTvr@)@aLPt"Tvr@)@aLo one that provides the highest5581"71"8)5271+"717171+"TTvr@)@aLP-!Tvr@)@aLpquality learning 771"211)881TPw r@)@+Lexperience for every child in the country? 1081)18,15)121)2,878"71,578")2*TX wh
r@)@ LPHoE5TTi
w
r@)@i
LPwMTT
w
r@)@
LP T
wr@)@
#Lcan whole families benefit and the ,18M7511S1+7180"187"71T\
`r@)@K-Lwhole community become the site for learning?M751,5SS78"271,6S1"71+"15)11)881*TT
`r@)@
KLP ;TTb(r@)@LP ;Rp@Cambriaa 8a a a O`2a a a a O`2a a jEU1a a 2FU1
X$7K@Cambri`=՟`2DJ2dGa PM1a a =RK1,a 2dv%%%T{Kr@)@6"LIncremental Change is Insufficient 6+).P-6#465464.& 6&6+.6"TTxKr@)@x6LP 9%%%TLLr@)@ULIt is generally accepted that education in Rwanda needs real transformation in order "+1181)121,,18"17"71"177,1"588>M18718117+)11")18+5)T1"5885)71)T`Z5 r@)@ LTto "5Td[15 r@)@[ LTmeetS11"TT2G5 r@)@2 LP TdH5 r@)@H LTthe "71Tl5 r@)@ LXgoals151+TT5 r@)@ LP T`C5 r@)@ LTof 5TD|5 r@)@D
L`Rwanda2020>N18717777T}5 r@)@} Lx. There are on averag;72)11)158121)11T5 r@)@ Le 50 pupils for every teacher. 177878+5)221)2"11,71)T7
r@)@ L|The teachers themselves;71"11,71)+"71S+121+TT7 r@)@ LP T!7 r@)@! L`typically"28,12TT7 r@)@ LP Th7 r@)@ /Lhave received minimal education. There are not 7121)1,1217S8S1177,1"58;71)11)185"Tt
r@)@
1Lquality texts for every child for every subject. 771"2"10"+5)121)2-775)221)2+771,"TT
r@)@
LP ;TT!
(
r@)@
LP ;Tl
8
r@)@
0LA 10% yearly improvement is typically viewed as >77Y211*2S8)522S18"+"28,1221M171+T9
#
r@)@9
Ldspectacular+81,"1,71)TT$
8
r@)@$
LP,TT9
N
r@)@9
LP TXO
r@)@O
LPye21TT
r@)@
LPt"TT
r@)@
LP T`
<
r@)@
LTit "T=
r@)@=
L`would be M57771T~r@)@jLxwoefully inadequ&" WMFC 5ate. M51728171771"1TTr@)@jLPI TXr@)@jLPf T4r@)@jL10% annual improvement were 77Y18871S8)521T18"M1)1T|5
r@)@5jL\achieved1,71217TT
r@)@
jLP Tl
r@)@
jLXonly 582Txr@)@jL\in the 8"71Tx3r@)@L\student+"7718"TT4Tr@)@4LP-!TlUr@)@U0Lteacher ratio, it would take 7 years to achieve "11,71))1"5!M577"2417211)+"52,7121T
r@)@ L`preferred8)11))17TT
r@)@
LP Tp
r@)@
LXratios)1"5+T|r@)@Ld. However, E5M121)Tjr@)@ULdthe cost of "71,5+"5Tfjr@)@ULhimplementationS81S18"1!58TTg|jr@)@gULP Tp}jr@)@}ULXwould M577Tx jr@)@UL\require)177)1TT jr@)@ ULP T8 jr@)@ U'Ltwice as many teachers and classrooms, "M,21+S182"11,71)+187,1++)55S+T`jr@)@ULTat 1"TTkr@)@LPa1TTk4r@)@LP Tp5kFr@)@5LXhuge c7711,TdGkr@)@GLTost.5+"TTkr@)@LP T,kr@)@%LThis does not even take into account ;7+751+85"1218"1418"51,,578"Tk
r@)@Lpthe issues of qua"71++71+5771T
kPr@)@
Lplity, materials, "2S1"1)1+TT
r@)@?
Lhtraining, etc.")18811"+TTT
r@)@?
LP T
T
r@)@?
#LNaturally, achieving better studentD1"7)121,7128171""1)+"7718"TT
T
r@)@
?
LP-!T
T
r@)@?
Lpteacher ratios is "11,71))1"5++T
PT
r@)@
?
L`desirable71+)171TQT
r@)@Q?
Ld, but as a 77"1+1TV
r@)@
L`means for S118+5)TxV
r@)@
L\overall521)1TTV
r@)@
LP TV
r@)@
Lsystemic transformation it is ,2+"1S,")18+5)S1"58"+T
V
r@)@
Ldthoroughly "75)57182TV
r@)@
Lhinsufficient. 8+7,18"TTV
r@)@
LP ;TT
(?r@)@*LP ;T@r@)@LlTextbooks are an;10"7554+1)118T@8r@)@:Lother salient example where incremental improvement would 5"71)+118"101S81M71)18,)1S18"1S8)521S18"M577Tl9@r@)@9LXfall 1Tl)r@)@LXshort+75)"T)r@)@Lt. In most countries 8S5+",578")1+T)r@)@>Ltexts are often obsolete, not of the highest quality, and not "10"+1)15"1857+51"085"5"717171+"771"218785"T+
r@)@4Lreadily available in all subjects for all children. )1172121171&" WMFC 81+771,"+5)1,77)18TT
+
r@)@
LP T
+r@)@
#LThe texts are created and produced ;71"10"+1)1,)11"171878)577,17Tr@)@Ldoutside the57"+71"71TTr@)@LP Tpr@)@LXcountr,578")T
r@)@Ly. The cost of purchase and 2;81,5+"587),71+1187T
r@)@
Lddistribution7+")77"58TTr@)@LP T
r@)@ L`is high. +717TT
%r@)@
LP ;TT(r@)@tLP ;Tcr@)@LRather than incrementally >1"71)"7188,)1S18"02Td] r@)@dLddistributing7+")77"81TT^ s r@)@^ LP Tlt k
r@)@t LXmore S5)1T<l
r@)@l
(Ltexts, by providing digitized materials "20"+728)5278171".17S1"1)1+TPtr@)@_VLto all children on their connected laptops, one not only diminishes the overall costs "51,77)1858"71)-5881,"1718"58*58175"5827S8+71+"71521)1,5+"+Tur@)@"Ldramatically, one also upgrades th7)1S1",125811+5781)171+"7THuYr@)@*Le quality and relevance of the materials. 1771"2187)11218,15"71S1"1)1+T^r@)@IFLMoreover, more locally created materials can be produced and provided.R5)1521)S5)15,12,)11"17S1"1)1+,18618)577,171878)62727TT?^r@)@ILP ;TT_(r@)@LP ;TIr@)@4GLThe needs to bring Rwanda to existing international norms are daunting.;718117+"57)81>M2871"510+"818"1)81"58185)S+1)17178"81TT Ir@)@ 4LP TT\Ir@)@4LPR>Tp]VIr@)@]4LXather 1"71)TJ/
r@)@?Lthan struggle to incrementally improve, the best strategy is to"718+")7111"58,)1T18"12S8)521"7171*"+")1"112+"5TT0
JE
r@)@0
LP TF
J9r@)@F
L`jump ahead7S817117TT:JNr@)@:LP.TTOJdr@)@OLP TTeJr@)@eLP ;TT(3r@)@LP ;%%%Td4r@)@LTThe 95.T4r@)@LdMathematics O5#5.P4#+&T`48r@)@LTof 3T94r@)@9 L`Computer 62P56".)T4
r@)@LlUsage in Schools?&54.60+532%TT
4
r@)@
LP 9%%%T{r@)@LhWhen thinking \718"78481T |=r@)@|#Lof bringing computers to schools, t57)8181,5S87"1)+"5+,755+"T> r@)@>Lphe first tendency 71)+""18718,2T!r@)@!
Lhis to try to +!5")2"5Tr@)@~KLmaximize access: how to give every child a chance to touch a computer. The S10S-11,,
&2WMFC1++75M#5121121)2-771,728,1"5"57,71,5S87"1);71TVr@)@Ltunderlying principle7871)2818)8,81TTWlr@)@WLP TmH r@)@mLpof equity is noble5177"2+8571TTI ] r@)@I LP.TT^ r r@)@^ LP T$s 0r@)@s $LHowever, if the overall goal is highE5M121)"71521)1151+717TT1Qr@)@1LP-!T|Rr@)@RL\quality 771"2T }r@)@hLteducation for all, 177,1"585)1Tt }}r@)@h1Lthen what must be maximized is not immediate, low"718M71"S7+"71S10S-27+85"SS171"15MTT~ }r@)@~hLP-!T }r@)@hLhimpact access S81,"1,,1++%%%T~
r@)@3Lfor the most children in the fastest time, but the 5)"71S5+",78)188"711+"1+""S177""61%%%T
~or@)@
!Lbest initial actions that enable ;5.%<%66/%9<.$<6%5<6;5%%%TPg
hr@)@S+Lthe greatest transformation of quality for %<54.56%5-%%-6<.!9-Y6%9<9!;<6%5!9.Th
hr@)@h
S!Lall children in the shortest time5/<<.5<<%<5.<9.%5.%%Y5%%%TX7hr@)@SLP. TT8rhr@)@8SLP ;%%666666666666666666666666666666666666 6 66 6
6
66
6
66666666
6
66
6
66666666666666666666."System--@Cambria--- @Cambria-@Cambria- @Cambria--@Cambria------ 2
kt
Laptops an
2
kd High
2
k-D=2
k!quality Education for Every Childi
2
kD2
kPart 2
---
2
k D---(2
}tHow to achieve high
2
}-DD2
}&quality education at a national scale?
2
}
D @Cambria---
2
t D J2
t*Part 1 of this essay emphasized providing
2
all
2
D2
child2 2
ren
2
D2
with 2 2
a high
2
-D&2
%quality education 52
tas their basic human right,
2
&and the
2
W D2
[role of %2
connected laptops
2
D%2
as the best tool 2
kto 2
t enable it
2
.D
2
D
2
t D 2
tAs %2
digital inclusion
2
D2
expands, t @2
7#he practical question becomes: how l
2
&do "2
:we go from the
2
tcurrent
2
D2
educational
2
D2
system
2
( D
2
+tD:2
1o one that provides the highest
2
-D%2
quality learning L2
t+experience for every child in the country? 2
Ho
2
wD
2
D@2
#can whole families benefit and the l
O2
t-whole community become the site for learning?
2
D
2
3t D @Cambria--->2
Et"Incremental Change is Insufficient
2
EO D ---2
WtUIt is generally accepted that education in Rwanda needs real transformation in order
2
itto 2
imeet
2
i D2
ithe 2
igoalsm
2
i D2
iof 2
i
Rwanda2020 +2
iP. There are on averag :2
ie 50 pupils for every teacher. .2
{tThe teachers themselves
2
{ D2
{ typically
2
{R DR2
{V/have received minimal education. There are not
U2
t1quality texts for every child for every subject.
2
D
2
t D S2
t0A 10% yearly improvement is typically viewed as
2
spectacular
2
,D
2
D2
ye
2
tD
2
# D2
&it 2
3 would be +2
twoefully inadequate.
2
ID2
f 52
10% annual improvement were
2
achieved
2
D2
only v 2
Ain the d 2
tstudentd
2
-DS2
0teacher ratio, it would take 7 years to achieve 2
preferred
2
D2
ratios2
C. However, 2
tthe cost of 2
implementation
2
% D2
(would 2
Urequired
2
DF2
'twice as many teachers and classrooms,
2
at
2
taD
2
{ D2
huge c 2
ost.
2
DC2
%This does not even take into account %2
the issues of qua %2
$lity, materials,
2
ttraining, etc.
2
D@2
#Naturally, achieving better studentt
2
-D&2
teacher ratios is 2
desirable 2
], but as a 2
t
means for
2
overalld
2
D82
systemic transformation it is
2
thoroughly 2
insufficient.
2
H D
2
0t D #2
BtTextbooks are an b2
B:other salient example where incremental improvement would
2
Bfall l2
Ttshortl )2
T. In most countries
h2
T>texts are often obsolete, not of the highest quality, and not Y2
ft4readily available in all subjects for all children.
2
f D@2
f#The texts are created and produced t 2
ytoutside the
2
y D2
ycountr 52
yy. The cost of purchase and 2
ydistribution
2
y D2
y is high.
2
y& D
2
t D 22
tRather than incrementally
2
$distributing
2
r D2
vmore r G2
(texts, by providing digitized materials
2
tVto all children on their connected laptops, one not only diminishes the overall costs
>2
t"dramatically, one also upgrades th
J2
U*e quality and relevance of the materials.
t2
tFMoreover, more locally created materials can be produced and provided.
2
R D
2
t D v2
tGThe needs to bring Rwanda to existing international norms are daunting.
2
R D
2
VRD 2
_ather j2
t?than struggle to incrementally improve, the best strategy is to
2
D2
jump ahead
2
Z.D
2
] D
2
a D
2
t D ---2
.tThe 2
.Mathematics
2
.of 2
. Computer c #2
.9Usage in Schools
2
. D --- 2
@tWhen thinking @2
@#of bringing computers to schools, t
&2
@he first tendency 2
@/
is to try to |2
RtKmaximize access: how to give every child a chance to touch a computer. The
)2
dtunderlying principle
2
d D&2
dof equity is noble
2
do.D
2
dr DA2
dv$However, if the overall goal is high
2
dY-D2
d^quality (2
vteducation for all, e U2
v1then what must be maximized is not immediate, low
2
v=-D 2
vBimpact access
---X2
t3for the most children in the fastest time, but the
---=2
!best initial actions that enable i
---L2
t+the greatest transformation of quality for =2
!all children in the shortest timei
---2
{.
2
D --՜.+,0hp
One Laptop per Child# kTitle
!"#$%&'()*,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|}~Root Entry FpH}Data
1TableWordDocument4(SummaryInformation(+DocumentSummaryInformation8CompObjy
F'Microsoft Office Word 97-2003 Document
MSWordDocWord.Document.89q