Ask OLPC a Question/1

From OLPC

< Ask OLPC a Question
Revision as of 10:04, 22 April 2013 by SvenAERTS (Talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Current revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

OLPC Question archives: 2006-2007, 2007-2009


On cleaning up the 2006 archives: Other sets of questions originally posted to the "Ask OLPC a Question" had been split into Q1 2006 and later 06/07. Those pages are [merged here]. With any luck the older a question is, the more likely it is to be near the top. Note that within the Q1_2006 archive, a distinction was maintained between questions that had been answered, and questions that had not been. (Of the questions that follow, the 5 questions from "Cambodia test?" through "How will updates work?" had been in the unanswered questions subset.)

Given that so many of the actual "answered questions" answers have been superseded by events over the last 12-18 months, the distinction may be misleading, and as I've merged the archive I've thought it clearer to abandon those labels. ~ Hexagonal



Contents

Cambodia test?

The FAQ mentions Cambodia twice. Can you link to more information about the pilot in Cambodia? Or provide details about it in the FAQ? When? How many devices? What hardware? What ages? What type of network access? What software was used? What operating systems?

Also, what village in Cambodia? --SvenAERTS 09:06, 22 April 2013 (UTC) Sven & Thol AERTS-MEY SREY (Adopted from Cambodia-Brussels, found back family in Cambodia)

Can tribal organizations within the US participate?

Within the US there are Native organizations and rural villages who could benefit from this as well. How can organizations which can find funding (1) work to make these available to the Tribal youth who could use them and (2)work toward customize Native content within the programming environment http://www.tananachiefs.org/

Can a legitimate NGO or foundation apply for your program?

In some countries there is a lot of corruption. Would OLPC partner with an NGO instead of the education ministry? Of course. You can e.g. always organize a regional or a test deployment. There must be some "nobel" people in the community that are looking to support an inspiring project and have their names connected to the largest educational effort every undertaken by Humanity: Millennium Development Goal nr. 2 - bringing universal primary education. OLPC helps to achieve that by providing an open hard and software educational project in the form of a rugged laptop for kids - a school reduced so much to its maximum it fits in a box. Just write out an invitation to participate in filling up the "put" of money to finance a launch. Some ball mark figures: minimum is 100 laptops. OLPC is overloaded with too many small projects. So minimum 100 laptops.--SvenAERTS 09:14, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Well, because corruption in the Government, in Mexico of the contracts for Enciclomedia (educational material) landed in friends of the president. Likewise the distribution and maintenance contracts will go to "relatives & friends" of government officers.

Maybe NGO´s are fair organizations (like Red Cross, Rotarians, Caritas, etc.).

Campaigns for OLPC laptops for Laos and Ethiopia

There are people enthusiastically putting forward cases for Laos and Ethiopia. What information does the OLPC management need presented to it in order for a case to succeed? How will their cases be assessed please?

FUNDING IDEA!

As far as funding goes, considering how economy works in industrial countries, i would say once the project is ready for roll out, you should seriously consider to make the laptop open to everyone through a webshop:

Promote different customary designs (limited editions - for psychological reasons), promote it together by putting emphasis on how to improve the world by making a small contribution and actually getting a quite usable AND very sturdy as well as ingenious laptop not to be seen elsewhere. Sell them for around 499$, and especially by advertising that by making this small contribution 4 laptops in a dev-country (which is not to be decided by the buyer for ethical reasons) and a small amount goes in to the olpc foundation.

Reflection on "Funding Idea": $499 is a price point that many TVWeb appliances attempted; unfortunately, it's still too high. However, if they were available at $199, aproximately $50 usd over cost, a fairly high percentage of geeks on Slashdot, digg, hackaday and various other communities would not only purchase them, but I would venture that this would spur system and application development as well. The cost of selling to the public need not be high; I would suggest even allowing any of the various OSS-CD online stores, thinkgeek, and the like to carry them and the administrative overhead in exchange for a small percentage over $199 (not to mention coolness factor).

How will updates work?

  1. How are the OS and applications going to be updated?
  2. Will the teacher push updates?
  3. Will some other authority push updates?
  4. How will systems be protected from viruses/worms?
  5. Does the OS/apps need a deeper level of protection than local user data?
  6. Do you need one server system per school/village/district to handle updates?
  7. How are updates authenticated?
  8. How will rollbacks be handled?
  9. Will encryption be allowed/disallowed?
  10. Since some authority is furnishing the laptops, is the assumed privacy level zero?
  11. Can Village A spy on Village B via the mesh network?


15:00, 3 April 2006 User:BobBagwill


eBook Specifications

When I am making Ebooks for OLPC, what font size should they be in, and what should the page size be? Also, is there a place to upload them when they are finished? --Munchinguy 20:09, 27 June 2006 (EDT)

well, you can't really make Ebooks for OLPC. They have to be made for kids in specific countries who speak specific languages and live in certain cultural environments. After that, there are far more important issues other than font and page size. If you look at this page and the pages linked to it, then you can find some discussion of the issues.
Font size is quite likely to be user selectable and screen size/resolution could vary over the life of the OLPC project. Indeed, even books designe for translation will have problems with page size because readers of different scripts will have different preferred font size which leads to different page sizes.

How are the textbooks going to be authored?

I read somewhere that the DJVU file format was going to be used for this project. Since DJVU authoring programs are few and far between, I'm curious how the DJVU files will be created. Anyone know?

DJVU books are not authored with software. Any paper books or documents, including handwritten ones, can be scanned and compressed into DJVU format. DJVU is more efficient than other compression formats but it also allows multiple page scans to be stored in a single book file that makes it easier to read than a folder full of PNG images. Click on DJVU for more information.
In some of the countries where there is little to no computerisation, DJVU will be the major tool used to make existing paper books available. Even in an advanced country like the USA, there is value in using DJVU compressed maps, historical documents, etc. For example, once you have installed a DJVU plugin from here, go to the Illinois Geographical Survey and click on one of the chapter headings in the table of contents.

Which countries are confirmed?

I remember reading something about Costa Rica, is this Central Anmerican country at the project? --Dagoflores 02:57, 19 March 2006 (EST)

If there is interest in Costa Rica, then you should ask the Costa Rican Ministry of Education to contact the OLPC team directly.

Libya has signed an MOU.--Mokurai 15:23, 28 October 2006 (EDT)

Doesn't it seem to be catering to small kids only

with just around 400-500 Mb of space available we cant expect laptop to be used by students in high-school or so who ,sometimes,need to store huge data.Dont you think that memory space should definitly be increased?Otherwise it becomes a 'playtoy' and not a 'tool' for kids.Because if we provide laptop to student at age of 7-8 yr and if it becomes useless at age of 13-14 yr when he actually realizes the capacity and power of the machine,the whole 'OLPC' idea fails.Because if laptop is unaffordable at age of 8,it remains so at age of 14 as well.

It would be instructive to have an example of an activity that a high-school student needs to engage in that is beyond the capacity of the machine.Walter 17:31, 13 July 2006 (EDT)


SVG is not well supported in GECKO - is somebody working on improving that?

  • To replace Flash at least SMIL Animations should work [1]
  • SVG is based on Cairo - is somebody developing a hardware accelerated Cairo version for the OLPC laptop?
  • Wikimedia supports SVG - will SVG be enabled in the OLPC WIKI?
  • What is the difference between GECKO and xulrunner? Is SVG better supported by xulrunner?
There is a javascript implementation of SMIL at [2]. To allow javascript for example in a wikipage is not a good idea - SMIL (without javascript) makes no problems for security.

South Africa

Has this project taken off in South African schools, particularly KwaZulu-Natal where there are over 6000 schools, over 50% of which are deep rural. If not, why not? JRosario July 13 2006

Not yet. We are in our launch phase right now and will be issuing a request for proposals as we progress. We look forward to seeing a proposal from South Africa and hope to be of some assistance to the school children there. Walter 11:15, 12 July 2006 (EDT)
We are in the process of putting together an RFP as a mechanism for countries to get involved in the project. As the details as worked out, we'll post them on this page: How can my country get involved?. Walter 16:49, 13 June 2006 (EDT)

Can you refer me to pages in French on this project?

I am working in Mali and have worked in Haiti and Quebec, in the past. I would like to refer my contacts to this project, many of them are strong in English but if I could send them URL's for French documentation that would be great, thank you. Patrick Fitzgerald'

Try http://www.laptop.org/index.fr.html as a start. Also, OLPC France. My apologies in advance for the quality of the translation. Please feel free to make improvements at Fr PO. Walter 11:19, 24 June 2006 (EDT)
I just now searched for OLPC Francais on Google, and got 185,000 hits. Google est ton ami.--Mokurai 02:26, 13 October 2006 (EDT)

Why not a small hard drive?

Hello. Wouldn't it be better to have a small HD instead? As far as I know, Flash memory has a much higher Gb cost than that of a standard HD. I also know that there are ridiculously small HDs with really large storage capacity, at least in comparison to the meager 512Mb you currently propose. Wouldn't a larger capacity storage help to extend the life of such a machine?

The biggest single point of failure of laptops is the HD. We are opting for robustness over more on-board storage. Synchronization with the "school server" should help mitigate some of the capacity challenges raised. Walter 02:03, 5 May 2006 (EDT)
Actually, I have been told that HDs are only the 2nd biggest point of failure; internal connectors breaking is Number 1. We are trying to eliminate most of those as well.Walter 03:40, 7 June 2006 (EDT)

What stops the thieves?

What will prevent gangs from targeting children who have these highly desirable laptops, and stealing them for resale? 62.6.139.14 11:03, 24 May 2006 (EDT)

The garish childlike colors and the toy appearance of the units will make them undesirable for adults to use or steal. But do not underestimate the child owners. They will know very well that this is a valuable object which they have been entrusted with. They will not want to lose them and will be careful about where they take them and when.

Would optional sound capabilities lower the price?

I wonder if the sound capabilities are really necessary, an option would be to leave them out to lower the price of the basic PC, and produce an optional USB device for sound capabilities for those that need it (blind people, analphabets learning to read, etc.). --Dagoflores 01:04, 17 March 2006 (EST)

The sound card can also do modem. A modem can attach to radio and phone lines, that gives you the internet. 62.252.0.11 10:12, 18 March 2006 (EST)
Music is fundumental and will not be compromised. We will have sound. Also the microphone input can be used for sensor input. Finally, a modem is of little use without a phone. Walter 10:56, 26 May 2006 (EDT)

Is there any work has been done for the making of e-Textbook?

One original goal of the OLPC is to use laptop to replace conventional textbooks. There is no much time left before the first release of OLPC laptops to these 7 developing countries in early 2007. The content of textbook is a very political thing and the making of the e-Textbooks could also not be a simple work. So it could be a very urgent and serious problem for the OLPC task.

There is work going on in the various launch countries (and elsewhere) on electronic text books. There are also several efforts to build textbooks as resources under a Creative Commons license. However, OLPC itself will not be creating any text books. Walter 09:52, 12 June 2006 (EDT)
We have a page for Electronic textbook projects.

Wording

Are "OLPC" and the "$100 Computer" the same?

No. One Laptop per Child (OLPC) is the name of a non-profit association whose mission is to provide a laptop computer for every child as "both a window and a tool: a window into the world and a tool with which to think." The $100 Computer (or Laptop) is the machine we are developing towards the realization of this mission. Walter 15:35, 4 June 2006 (EDT)

Improving scale of products sold and commercial partners

OLPC relies on economy of scale to reach low prices. To improve scale, why not sell important parts separately from the laptop? For example, the screen technology could be sold for use in home theatre remotes and in-car computers at higher prices to subsidize OLPC somewhat. Assuming there is some central OLPC organization with employees, I would suggest creating a few non-laptop departments focused on other mass-market uses of the technology--then again, attempting to find companies that would be interesting in buying a million or two units might be a better strategy.

I feel like restricting the laptop and its components to one purpose is unnecessary--then again, I haven't studied the problem. Maybe someone can explain why it's necessary, but I wonder if it's just a lack of managerial resources.-Qwertie

The bottom line is that our mission is learning, not laptops. While we will be working with a commercial partner at some point for both machines and interesting parts--we've been looking at models where by the commercial side can help drive down the cost for the kids--our immediate priority is the non-commercial machine. --Walter
The Laptop is made of stock parts, such as memory, and custom assemblies, such as the screen and case. The stock parts are already made and sold in quantity by various commercial enterprises. The custom assemblies probably won't match the requirements of other products, except possibly the screen and power supply.
The real question is whether licensing the screen technology would bring in more revenue. I know companies that would be interested, if OLPC wants to talk to them, but this sort of thing takes time. It won't help in the initial launch.--Mokurai 15:32, 28 October 2006 (EDT)

Inclusion of BASIC: an easy-to-learn programming language?

The inclusion of BASIC in the early home computers in the west created a generation of children who could program, many of whom turned into professional programmers. The UK IT industry for one owes a lot to these early home computers. Will a language, such as BASIC, be included with these laptops? - Dan Huby, dan at huby dot me dot uk.

We will ship with at least four "Turing machines": Python, Javascript, CSound, and Logo. Walter 01:47, 17 June 2006 (EDT)
There are numerous other programming languages available for download in Free Software implementations.--Mokurai 15:35, 28 October 2006 (EDT)
As of the mass production date, there is still no LOGO, but there is a non-recursive visual programming system called Turtle Art. --IanOsgood 19:35, 12 November 2007 (EST)

Is it possible to add a pen input interface (e.g. touchscreen) for OLPC Laptop?

If OLPC Laptop has the pen input interface, it will be a good start point for the R&D of the handwirting recognition in the open source community and good for children in the furture.

We are working on two tracks: a touch interface for the screen and dual-mode trackpad that is capacitive (finger) in the center and resistive (stylus) across the length of the keyboard. Not sure which will work, but we will make every effort. Walter 23:39, 8 June 2006 (EDT)

Font rendering on the OLPC laptop

On a Microsoft Windows platform, point size translates to pixels as 1 point is 4/3 pixels, though rounded to a whole number of pixels. For example, 12 point is 16 pixels above the base line of the font plus extra for any descenders, at the same scaling.

On an Apple Mac, (I think) it is one point is one pixel. So 12 point is 12 pixels. How descenders work I do not know.

Could you say how 24 point renders on the OLPC laptop please? This information is important as it is possible to some extent to help a font render well by careful design of the positioning of contours in relation to grid lines within the font unit space of a TrueType font even though hinting is not used.

Traditionally, as indicated in the table you have provided below, one point is 1/72th of an inch, so the relationship between point and pixel would be dictated by the resolution of the display. I recall that the original Macintosh was 72DPI, hence the 1-to-1 correspondence between pixels and point. Since we will have a fixed-resolution display, we should be able to map directly to the traditional measure as well. At 1200×900 pixels on a 4:3 aspect ratio, 7.5" diagonal display (6"×4.5"), the pixel resolution is 200DPI. Therefore, 1 point is 2.8 (200/72) pixels; 24 point is 66.7 pixels. Walter 13:30, 20 June 2006 (EDT)
   * in: inches -- 1 inch is equal to 2.54 centimeters.
   * cm: centimeters
   * mm: millimeters
   * pt: points -- the points used by CSS2 are equal to 1/72th of an inch.
   * pc: picas -- 1 pica is equal to 12 points. 
   W3C CSS2
   1pt = (25.4 millimeters) / 72 = 0.352777778 millimeters
   1px = (113.4 millimeters) / 900 = 0.126 millimeters
Pixel size depends on monitor size, and is not fixed in relation to font size as you seem to think. In addition, many applications allow the user to increase or decrease the size of a displayed document, so 24 pt type can show up on the screen in just about any size. Anyway, Linux uses standard TrueType and OpenType font rendering, so you should look up how the font engines like xfstt do it. For line layout of multiple languages, the Laptop will use the Pango rendering library.--Mokurai 02:31, 13 October 2006 (EDT)

Cultural effects?

Has your team considered the cultural ramifications of injecting first world technology into the third world? Granted, it aims to allow the recipients to be more competitive in the first world marketplace- but is it really our place to pushing our culture onto these developing nations? Please do not be offended by this question, as my goal is not to attack the project- but rather I am certain that these issues have been discussed amongst the participants and I am curious about their philosophy on this. (ie: do they see this as a form of muted cultural imperialism?) -- Adam W, July 12th 2006

First of all, the OLPC initiative is a "pull" initiative, not a "push" initiative. We are not pushing anything on anyone. However, to the extent that cultural imperialism is "the practice of promoting the culture or language of one nation in another," we are promoting the use of computation as a "thing to think with," a means of empowering children to learn. However, this is not strictly a First World concept. It is well in line with the work of people like Paulo Freire and others who have had profound impact on learning culture globally. And by adopting an open architecture, we are both enabling and encouraging the project to be appropriated by the local culture (language and literature). Walter 11:15, 12 July 2006 (EDT)

man-centered vs social-centered

a media (laptop) for the kids or a tool for the teachers ?

Is the use of a laptop, a tool very individual oriented, against the social background of many of the target people of this project ? Many of the kids that this project is targeted to are born in society more social-oriented than the westener countries, in countries where information/knowledge is accessed more through social bridges more than individual experience. The Individualism of modern western society is focusing on giving "individual" learning tools: laptop, pc, even books. In other society the teacher is still the main "medium" and source of knowledge; first (or second) the family, third the friends/society as a whole.

The basic model we are working with is "create and share." We are leveraging three basic human attributes in our design: (1) the ability to learn; (2) the need to express; and (3) the need to be social. By default, the laptop will be all about being social, not about the individual. In fact, one of the reasons we think that the laptop is an important form factor (and the reason for our emphasis on the mesh network) is that we expect the families and other community members to be part of the learning experience. Walter 11:15, 12 July 2006 (EDT)

Cellphones

What is the purpose of these devices as new multimedia devices with similar capabilities are almost getting to this price point?

We are designing a laptop for children to learn with. These other "new multimedia devices" are targeting a different need and hence have a different set of design criteria, i.e., they tend to be optimized for received expression rather than personal expression. Walter 11:15, 12 July 2006 (EDT)

Why is the laptop using SLC Flash instead of MLC Flash? Is MLC not cheaper than SLC?

The short answer is lifetime: SLC flash is rated at ~100K cycles and MLC flash is rated at ~10K cycles. Walter 22:06, 12 July 2006 (EDT)

How rugged are these laptops going to be?

I read that these laptops are supposed to be "rugged" and (as much as possible) unlikely to break. How do they compare in the regard to conventional laptops, "semi-ruggedized" laptops, and "ruggedized" laptops? It would be quite a feat if they could perform as well as ruggedized laptops, since they typically cost hundreds more than their equivilent "normal" counterparts.

The OLPC is not ruggedized for the most part. Instead the approach taken has been to make a robust and rugged design that does not suffer from the weaknesses of existing laptops. One of the few features that could be considered ruggedization is the case. But, unlike normal laptops, the OLPC has no hard drives, no internal cables, no fans. By removing the weak points, we do not need to add additional costly ruggedization features.


Official software list: eToys?

Will Alan Kay's Squeakland and its eToys, and Scratch be included in the official OLPC distribution? (Roughly speaking, Squeakland is a custom Squeak Smalltalk image specially built for K-8 education by 'learning by doing'. Scratch is another Squeak image for grades 9-12.)

Squeak is not on the current list, but you can certainly join the discussion on its page.--Mokurai 15:48, 28 October 2006 (EDT)

Why is the list of official OLPC sotware not linked from the Software page on the wiki?

The list of official software is linked from the menu on the left, which is visible from every page.--Mokurai 15:48, 28 October 2006 (EDT)

Where is the debate on what software will be included and what won't make the cut (somewhere on the wiki? Sorry I couldn't track it down.) -- David, July, 2006

On the Talk:Software page, accessible from Software by clicking the discussion tab.--Mokurai 15:48, 28 October 2006 (EDT)

Economic Impact

Some people are fearful of OLPC in that Brazil, India & China are expected to become economic powerhouses. I think their fear is due to a lack of understanding of global economics and that they view this as a zero-sum game. Has any recognized economist addressed this?

As far as I know, most economics textbooks fail to point out clearly enough that in a Free Market, both parties to a transaction come out ahead. This comes from too much focus on money prices and on marginal cost of production, and not enough on value. Goods and services are priced by the market in an equal manner, but valued by the individual participants entirely differently. A baker and a dairyman both put a high value on that part of their production that feeds them and their families, and a much lower value on the remaining stock that they trade. They then put a high value on some quantity of the others' product, and are eager to trade some of theirs for it.
In international trade, the good of the consumer is frequently sacrificed to the interest of specific groups of politically-organized producers. So the US turned down the offer of low-cost gasoline from Venezuela during the Katrina disaster, and refuses entry to (that is, sets high tariffs on) Brazilian fruit and sugar products, including orange juice and alcohol (made from sugar, in competition with highly subsidized US corn, but is nevertheless cheaper) for cars.
See Joseph Stiglitz, Globalization and Its Discontents and Making Globalization Work. Stiglitz received a Nobel Prize for analyzing economic situations of unequal information. What we need now is the recognition that for people with no information, the economy is out of reach, and that access to information needs to be treated as a fundamental Human Right.
See also Thorstein Veblen, The Theory of the Leisure Class, which explains the ways in which people act out their desire to be, and more importantly to appear, richer than others.--Mokurai 17:09, 28 October 2006 (EDT)

Lifespan

How many years will these machines be operative?.

It is usual in developed countries to replace computers after three years or so, since computers increase in capacity and performance at a rate of 35+% annually. I have suggested that countries could issue new Laptops to schoolchildren in grades 1, 5, and 9, or in grades 1, 4, 7, and 10, and I have done some cost calculations on that basis, published elsewhere on the Net.--Mokurai 17:30, 28 October 2006 (EDT)

Have you thought of a reciclying program?. Enourmous amounts of garbage could result from all these equipment when they become obsolete.

OLPC indeed thought about recycling, as stated elsewhere in this Wiki, but there are no definite plans yet. The question does not arise seriously for three or four years to come. --Mokurai 17:30, 28 October 2006 (EDT)

Also, are the modules interchangeable so that semi-skilled people can make one good one from two dead ones?

No, a tightly integrated system is cheaper to make than a modular system. But the children may work out how to make FrankenLaptops anyway. ^_^ --Mokurai 17:30, 28 October 2006 (EDT)

Like people, laptops have many age-related illnesses, ranging from plastic embrittlement due to evaporation of plasticizers (the laptop I am writing this with is now dying of this, as parts of the case now shatter when bumped) to the common combined use of aluminum bonding wires and water permeable plastic packaging in ICs so that chips literally corrode in moist environments. The list is seemingly endless. Regardless of the production rate, an "equilibrium" will eventually be reached when they die as fast as they are manufactured. Does anyone have any idea what that equilibrium is?

If it is more than three years before failures become common, it doesn't matter. Equilibrium will never happen, because old computers will be replaced with new ones en masse.--Mokurai 17:30, 28 October 2006 (EDT)

There ARE good approaches for very long life, but plastic cases and conventional keyboards wouldn't seem to be a part of them.

Really? I and my family have some more-than-ten-year-old systems (in plastic cases with conventional keyboards) in our personal collections that still work fine. Commodore 64s, for example. The Computer History Museum has working systems more than 30 years old. --Mokurai 17:30, 28 October 2006 (EDT)

Then, there is the ox cart approach, of making everything easy and inexpensive to replace, e.g. using individual standard battery cells rather than custom battery packs that cannot easily be repaired by semi-skilled people. Of course, this approach would involve the use of more expensive connectors. What is the anticipated level of connectorization?

Answered above. No. --Mokurai 17:30, 28 October 2006 (EDT)

The design lifespan, whatever it is, is a basic hardware parameter that should appear in the hardware specifications. What is it?

The actual lifespan is unknown. There is some stress testing being done, which will give a partial answer. However, the designers took the expected lifespan of components and materials into consideration when choosing them. --Mokurai 17:30, 28 October 2006 (EDT)

How serious are you about this project?

Yesterday I talked to the principal of a school in my neighborhood here in Accra, Ghana. He said, he wanted to have computers for his students. I referred him to wait for another year. After this, I assured him, he could buy a Laptop for around 150 $ from the OLPC. He was amazed and will now organize some funding, to have it ready by next year. He will not look into any other option; he will not buy a crappy desktop for the same price now. If the 100 laptop were to be ready in 2008, he probably would buy a crappy desktop.

Tell us about the crappy desktop he can get for $150. Does that include a monitor, or does your friend already have one? Is a hard drive included? A faster processor than the Geode in the Laptop? I am guessing that this computer is faster and has greater capacity than the Laptop, and your friend should not wait.--Mokurai 17:40, 28 October 2006 (EDT)

My point is: Please announce every setback as early as possible, please be very conservative in your estimation and planning, and please consider: every day you keep somebody waiting faithfully you keep him from taking action. A false promise is the worst thing to give to a developing country (and to anybody).Simon J Smend

It is improper to make promises on someone else's behalf.
  • OLPC can hardly announce plans for next year's price and availability before getting this year's first orders in. First deliveries are expected to occur in mid-2007.
  • Current plans for retail sales depend on getting some vendor to buy in, and the price will more likely be in the neighborhood of $350.
--Mokurai 17:40, 28 October 2006 (EDT)

I wonder if one isn't taking the OLPC project from the wrong angle when advising to wait or to stare at the price. Does one need a laptop / XO before one can take part in the OLPC Opan hard and software EDUCATIONAL initiative ? I don't think so. One can talk about it to the educational community. Maybe there are teachers who already have a laptop at home. Maybe they would be very inspired if you link them to the OLPC open hard and software initiative, show them what needs to be answered, what they can team up in: making the best book for their discipline in their country. Team up with other teams from other regions, ... prepare a test deployment. Filling out grant forms for this. etc. --SvenAERTS 09:58, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Individuals and OLPC

I've heard that individuals won't be allowed to buy OLPC laptops, or that it won't be available to the public. If so, why not? Wouldn't it be good for the project? You can sell them without having to provide a general-purpose OS preinstalled, after all. -Qwertie

It has been stated several times in this Wiki that OLPC is discussing retail sales with various vendors, and that nothing has happened yet. --Mokurai 17:54, 28 October 2006 (EDT)

I think it is important that the general public be able to purchase this especially professionals in the IT industry.

Why? This is not a suitable product for IT professionals. You can do development for it on any desktop or laptop Linux system. Only hardware and driver developers need access to the hardware, and they have but to ask. --Mokurai 17:54, 28 October 2006 (EDT)

It's a bit like OPEN SOURCE. Access by the public is what has made it so great....and thus projects like the OLPC can benefit as a result. In my view it is absolutely consistent with the OLPC objectives of learning. - NWs

I think it would be very sensible to allow access to these computers for richer individuals, if only to encourage development of literature and educational materials availability internationally.

Currently it is governments only, minimum quantity 1 million, cost $250 million including servers, infrastructure, training, and so on. See the Libya MOU.

Patchoul here, my daughter is age 6 with Down Syndrome and ADHD and developmental delay, however she responds well at home when using our family PC and is learning language, reading and writing but she has limited use of the school PC and all of the professionals who see her suggest that more use on a PC in school would help her. Our local education authority will not fund another PC for her to use and as I a lone parent of three children and I am myself disabled, I do not have enough funds to purchase what could be an expensive piece of hardware, for her to use in school. Would there be any way of one of the robust laptops in your project, being made availablke for her to use please ? I would fund this myself if it is possible please. thank you, from Patchouli, Liverpool, UK.

You would do better to get her a $500 laptop, which will have a significantly faster processor, much more memory, a capacious hard drive, and a CD-ROM drive. If you want Linux and Free Software generally, which I recommend, talk to your local Linux User Group about what hardware to buy, and take it to a Linux Installfest. Ubuntu and Kubuntu are currently the most popular Linux distributions for such systems. Ask to see both before you decide. There are non-profits that can help you acquire one. Post here again if you need help finding them. (I and my children have milder disabilities, and you are absolutely right about the necessity of getting the children their own computers/mental prostheses.) --Mokurai 17:54, 28 October 2006 (EDT)

*BSD operating systems

Has there been work with using any BSD operating systems on the hardware? journaling flash file system for any BSD?

Did you just put your hand up? ^_^ I would be delighted if any BSDers took up the challenge. I don't speak for OLPC, but according to their hardware policy, you could probably get a few Laptops for the development group.
There are journaling flash file systems for Linux, too.--Mokurai 18:00, 28 October 2006 (EDT)
I hear FreeBSD is "much faster than Linux" but I haven't confirmed this. This leads me to the ridiculous and impulsive thought that maybe Linux's mm/ tree needs a complete rewrite. --Bluefoxicy 16:18, 23 September 2006 (EDT)
"Please check your facts before posting nonsense to Usenet."--Beable van Polasm, alt.religion.kibology ^_^ --Mokurai 18:00, 28 October 2006 (EDT)

How will these societies will be impacted

How will the poorest societies in the world will be impacted by a sudden injection of technology on this scale? This is a critical question that needs much deeper answers than this FAQ has given. I've added some necessary questions to dig deeper:

You tell us. We aren't the final judges. But I would think we would start with how much more the children are learning, how well it relates to their needs, whether it results in improvements in health, agricultural practices, social organization, economic opportunity, creating more responsive and less corrupt governments, real debate on the future of the world...Well, that's enough to be getting on with. --Mokurai 18:19, 28 October 2006 (EDT)
  • How much research has been conducted on how the societies will be impacted?
  • How will family, community, and religious structures that have existed for generations be impacted?
  • How will the project affect relationships between generations or traditional social structures based on age?

Everythingisok 11:21, 25 May 2006 (EDT)

Song, The World Turned Upside Down, played at the conclusion of the American Revolutionary War according to legend.
Seriously, how can we tell? It hasn't ever been tried. But you could look at, say, the history of the printing press and the social revolutions it inspired, from the Reformation (printing of Bibles in local languages), to scientific publications, to the American Revolution (Freedom of the Press).
For your last question, I only want to point out that computers and communications systems mean that the generations will be able to maintain contact, even if the children move to the cities, or to other countries, to get work. And that Laptops will make it possible to preserve languages and cultures far beyond anything possible before.
For a completely different view of these issues, see the Science Fiction novel Air, or Have-Not-Have, by Geoff Ryman, in which a village is put on the Net 24/7 with direct mind links, but with no warning or assistance. ("Have-Not-Have" is a literal translation of the Chinese idiom "You mei you?", which simply means "Do you have it?" or "Does it exist?") --Mokurai 18:19, 28 October 2006 (EDT)

Are there efforts to make OLPC an international organisation?

"At the moment OLPC is an American-based non-profit organisation. The development of the $100 laptop hardware design was an excellent work! But isn't it time now to make this a more international movement?"

Yes of course.

OLPC is an Open Community, Open Software and Open Hardware, Educational Initiative aligning with e.g. Millennium Development Goal nr.2: bringing universal primary education.

In the Academic world e.g., professors - paid by public funds, may or may not contribute to bringing universal education, study what can foster this etc. and motivate their students to align with this or not. Those active in Pedagogy of course are more/very likely to have been studying how to improve and bring education to remote areas and since computers are around, how ict can help, what are the supportive conditions to make ict work for education better and what are conditions that make ict fail.

In the Engineering academic world, some professors choose not to align with great initiatives, others - like Prof. NEGROPONTE - do inspire their students to work on e.g. the technical part of helping to bring universal education, out came OLPC's XO. And congratulations to the MIT and Prof. NEGROPONTE, because they managed to get to a real breakthrough, i.e. developing an XO prototype, getting it in the hands of people like UN Secretaries, getting the initiative on the agenda, being a bit provocative and creating a media storm, etc.

On a certain moment, an international team around Prof. NEGROPONTE needed to create an organization with a name that would carry this universal education initiative upon they had been working, and created a not for profit called OLPC and as the MIT was based in the USA, it was a not for profit according to American law of course.

But not so long after that, OLPC opened up an entity in Europe - Belgium near Brussels: again a not for profit, this time according to Belgian law of course.

The team there has a very specific purpose. I assume you know that Brussels is the capital of the European Union and holds the highest concentration of diplomats in the world and is a strategic center in that sense, just like Paris, Switserland, Washington, Singapore and please add some other places in Brazil, India, Russia, China, and other booming places in our multi-polar world. The Brussels OLPC team makes sure they have and keep good contacts with all ambassadors, so that they are kept update when the president or the minister of education visits some international meeting in Brussels and try to squeeze themselves into that president or ministers agenda and talk and update them about "OLPC and help keep bringing Universal Education at the top of their agenda, "if they agree the young generation is among the most valuable assets the country has", etc.". So that when YOU, in your country manage to get a breakthrough, at least you can rest assure your president and minister of education know VERY WELL what OLPC is all about and that you are talking quality and they better take you serious and make time for you. Of course, check out your countries'page on this wiki to find out what has been done already, what the status is, align with groups that have been working on bringing Universal Education in your country. Be realistic. It took Mr. NEGROPONTE also the time and efforts to first make it to obtaining a University Degree, that was not enough, he had to make it to professor, not at some university but at the MIT, and luckely his brother was a senator and that made that finally the right circumstances came together so he could AND get a budget via his brother of some millions of $ and himself being in a fostering MIT-University level of university and with the right mix of technical students and lab and equipment and academics and support in Pedagogical insights, etc. to finally get an XO prototype and OLPC not for profit organization AND a whole open software community that programmed Linux and had been bashing monopolies for years and years and helped create the proper supportive base in society, and also educate society so they would understand what open software and open hardware and olpc was all about. Even in the worst developing country, there is a Ministry of Education and there are people that lived before and live now that have been dealing with Education, there are Universities and competent people dealing with Pedagogy and ICT and they know OLPC as well. I really would advise you to exchange viewpoints with them as well so you don't stand there at some point, bashing against your president or minister of education that OLPC and XO's are great and that they are incompetent for not having implemented it yet. You make a very bad figure if you would be number 500 coming to them asking them if they have heard of OLPC. Claiming you are so well informed and in a position to give advise about OLPC, yet you don't even know who has been doing what regarding OLPC and Education in your country/region. So please, check out the country pages and invest yourself a minimum in things.

If you want to talk about OLPC, no problem. You want to bring funds together, on problem, or yes there is. OLPC has had many cases where crooks CLAIM they are OLPC and just put their own personal bank account details and start collecting funds for some "OLPC" project when in fact the money goes just into their pockets or an NGO that is managed by them. 1. OLPC brings these people to court. 2. The proper way to do is to prepare well, go to the nearest legal OLPC entity, exchange viewpoints what you want to do and when you get green light to proceed - and probably they will give you additional great advise, contacts, material - and use an official OLPC bank account. By the way: OLPC bank accounts - as they are registered NGO's with additional tax benefits for donors - make it so that when people donate 100 € for your initiative, the ministry of taxes, adds another 33% or more to the 100 € or reimburses the donator with 33€ taxes, or cuts his taxes with 33€. And no worries, if your idea is so great, OLPC will - AFTERWARDS - give you the money you managed to collect on their bank account to do whatever it is you planned to do, like implementing a 10.000 XO test deployment in a certain region. You want to earn money with OLPC, no problem: go work in the Educational system in your country or introduce a project+budget in an NGO that is going to be so enthusiastic they allow you to apply for a fund under their NGO's name. When you get the fund for your project, that includes e.g. a salary for you coordinating the implementation of a 10.000 XO test deployment in a certain region, voila that's how you can make money thanks to OLPC/XO. You don't get paid for selling XO's or a commission by OLPC because you managed to get the government or some NGO sign a contract for 10.000 XO's. OLPC is not going to pay your flight to get to a place where you may meet a minister and maybe sign a contract for 10.000 XO's. OLPC is an open community project, if is carried by the free energy and time available in society, this means you have to put yourself into a position, e.g. you are working in some international organization that needs you to be in that specific country and after your work there, you have time to talk to the minister or go support a local deployment there. So in that sense, open community projects, open software projects are very hard: you contribute to Linux, but how you are going to make a living out of freely contributing to Linux is your problem in a certain sense. It must be so that the company that is hiring you or the people that need your services, the additional value you create, you can create it easier, more obviously, people will pay YOUR services quicker than someone else's services because you can demonstrate: "yes, but I am contributing to Linux or some open software project, so I know it better than the others, so with 100€, I can do a lot more than my competitor.". Or: "Who do you prefer to hire: a person that can demonstrate having programmed several times a software in the open source community that is apparently so useful because it is used by millions of users now, or someone who claims being able to spot market opportunities and claims offering solutions that are so brilliant they will be used by millions of users." These are drivers for people to invest time and efforts in "Open Community" projects. But as you sense probably, people do not always do that all their working life, but more when they are student or early career, or only when their company allows them to contribute to open community projects on their payroll e.g. 1 day every 14 days, or when they are retired and get paid by the state, etc. . This said, OLPC and again Prof. NEGROPONTE and his team were so competent - not only in pedagogy or ICT - they managed to demonstrate to companies and (powerful) people and inspire them so much they donated such sums of money, the not for profit could hire some full time paid workers to accelerate certain specific aspects of the OLPC goals. --SvenAERTS 08:47, 16 May 2012 (UTC)


There are numerous OLPC affiliates in other countries --Mokurai 18:32, 28 October 2006 (EDT)
  • The open source community is called "External Developers".
Yes, we in Free and Open Source Software are fully involved in creating ever more software that will run on the Laptop, even if we aren't part of the organization. --Mokurai 18:32, 28 October 2006 (EDT)
  • Some countries are not able to take part in OLPC because they fear the American influence.
Well, I'll grant you all the countries under embargo by the US, including North Korea, Burma, Iran, Cuba...Whom else did you have in mind? --Mokurai 18:32, 28 October 2006 (EDT)
  • The Boss of the United Nations traditionaly is from Africa and is black — couldn't OLPC do the same?
Not so. See Wikipedia: United Nations Secretaries-General. UK, Norway, Sweden, Burma, Austria, Peru, Egypt, Ghana, South Korea. Only one black African. I'm sure that Kofi Annan would be happy to take on an honorary leadership position, but he can't do the technology or business parts of the job. --Mokurai 18:32, 28 October 2006 (EDT)

"Not a laptop project, but an education project"

I'm a little confused.

I'm a little confused about what you are confused about. I will answer according to my understanding, and I hope that you will not take it amiss if I answer the wrong questions. Please ask again if we do not understand each other correctly. --Mokurai 18:50, 28 October 2006 (EDT)

Sometimes OLPC is called an education project.

Always

If it is an education project then the hardware and the operating system are only small parts of the project.

Correct. See pages on software, the various Education pages listed in the Table of Contents, and so on.

The page Predecessors_of_OLPC has changing content because people don't know what OLPC really is.

Well, it has changing content because this is a Wiki. What precisely is your concern? Did you express it on the Discussion page?

There is no problem if OLPC "only" makes the hardware, system software and software development tools. This is good enough for a Nobel prize.

OLPC also does communications infrastructure, Internet connections, school servers, training, curriculum development, and support for localization into numerous languages.

People should know what OLPC is working on and what other organizations should do. 99% of the information in this wiki is about technology. There are some really good contributions like Talk:Localization_Common_Room. To understand different cultures is very important for this project but I can't see any efforts in that direction.

Check the pages OLPC, Literature, Countries, Languages, Writing systems, Keyboard layouts, and Input Methods. What else would you like to see? You are entirely at liberty to create the pages you want.

If OLPC is an education project then use this education platform to learn something about other cultures. "Eat your own dogfood" [3] — that makes a project successful.

Works for me. Check my page. --Mokurai 18:50, 28 October 2006 (EDT)

If this learning platform should support children in learning to write— test your platform and learn Thai, Chinese or a language from the Indian subcontinent.

I don't see the connection. Yes, more people should learn more languages, but the subject here is building the tools. Once the Laptop is in schools, the opportunity to learn another language will be vastly greater than it is now.

(grammar and spelling corrections are welcome) --Bz 12:55, 10 June 2006 (EDT)

You're fine.

Klik

In the System software page is the following.

Should there be an easy way to install and remove applications from the device without corrupting the system image? I am thinking of something like klik (http://klik.atekon.de/). -- DPalmerJr

-> An initial proposal and a proof-of-concept demo is here. -- Probono

There appears elsewhere in this wiki.laptop.org wiki discussion of which linux implementation is to be used on the OLPC laptop.

Is the decision of whether to use the klik system a decision which is independent of which linux implementation is used on the OLPC laptop?

Is the decision of whether to use the klik system a decision for the OLPC management or is klik in effect at an application program level such that any individual OLPC laptop could use or not use the klik system depending upon the choice of the owner of the particular laptop?

Boot language

Linux for normal starts with some text messages. These messages for normal are in english and even for power users not easy to understand. Are there plans to translate these messages to a language the children understand? The children for normal don't speak english and even if the children speak english - they will not understand it.

Khim: Linux boot messages are not for normal humans! Period. They only are ever needed if "something goes wrong"(tm). You can spot some simple problems right away, but if not - you'll be asking someone on mailing list, or in forum, etc. You google for it or send it back to the original developer (kind-of-last-resort) and then... it will be ignored if original developer can not undestand them. You'll do HUGE disservice if you'll translate them. But hiding them behing splash screen unless some key is pressed - this can actually be good idea...

Font type

Will the OLPC laptop use TrueType fonts and only TrueType fonts?

TrueType, OpenType, PostScript, and bitmap, just like any other Linux. TrueType is not adequate for some writing systems. SIL is the authority on this subject. --Mokurai 18:53, 28 October 2006 (EDT)

Why a QWERTY keyboard?

Since you're obviously interested in effective design (i.e. removing the caps lock key, etc.) why not use the Dvorak keyboard?

Dvorak keyboard layouts come standard with Linux. I'm using one to type this. However, Dvorak is only suited to English and a few other Latin-alphabet languages. We have to allow QWERTY, since more people use it, and also French AZERTY, German QWERTZ, and so on, as well as layouts for other writing systems --Mokurai 18:56, 28 October 2006 (EDT)

How can our organization/group/country/region etc. participate?

Why not have the product available to poverty level children in the USA?

We have an art project for low income kids that could use this. http://www.riversidenet.info/

Why could this program not ALSO be targeted to poverty-stricken schools in the US? Our kids are so far behind other developed countries in these schools...this "education-project" would well-serve our country as well and perhaps develop more people like those behind OLPC...

Well, go ahead, then. Start OLPC USA to lobby Congress and the separate states to buy into the program. Wait a minute, I can do that. Hmmm, I'll get back to you. --Mokurai 19:00, 28 October 2006 (EDT)
Yes, here you go, OLPC USA.--Mokurai 20:01, 28 October 2006 (EDT)

How will you make sure they are fairly distributed?

You plan to distribute the laptops through the government in such countries as China. How will you make sure that the laptops are distributed fairly, and not just to kids in communist party households?

Governments have to commit to supplying Laptops to whole classes, not selected individuals. The public has a responsibility to report on violations. This means you. --Mokurai 19:18, 28 October 2006 (EDT)

Also, another concern I'm sure you've heard raised is that the hardware is not open source. Won't proprietary, closed-source software limit the spread of the laptops?

Let's be clear. No hardware is Open Source, although the Simputer people have a partially open license. The Laptop will come with Free/Open Source Software exclusively, as I read the plans on the software page. Users will be free to download non-Free software if it suits them, but will be able to run on just Free Software.--Mokurai 19:18, 28 October 2006 (EDT)

Lastly, concerns have been brought up about the economic effect of releasing the computers in a closed market. What is your response to critics who argue that computer companies in poor countries would be hit negatively by the wide availability of these laptops.

I just don't think leaving it up to the government is a good idea. And buying in bulk (thousands) isn't realistically in any sense.
Computer companies in poor countries are not selling to schools in significant quantities now, whereas schools getting OLPC Laptops will need more computers than they get from OLPC, particularly for teachers. Employable graduates of the schools and those going on to college or university will need to buy their own computers. The market will boom.
It isn't up to governments alone. They do the deals and the organization, and the rest of us get to watch what happens and comment to the world if anything goes wrong. I think you'll be surprised (as will some governments) at how quickly the process becomes transparent. After all, we are talking about putting people on the Internet in million lots. If anybody tries to interfere with their access, they will have every opportunity to get the word out. And pictures, too.
Again, that's "million", not "thousands". Libya signed up for $250 million worth (MOU, no contract yet), and other countries are discussing it. They don't think the deal is unrealistic in size. They just have to convince enough of the movers and shakers within the country that the results are worthwhile. Maybe some bankers, too. --Mokurai 19:18, 28 October 2006 (EDT)

The computer is a really good idea—MAKE US PAY

I wish, please do they sold in every high developed countrys

This is by far the most Frequently Asked Question on this Wiki. Yes, there will be a retail version, but not before 2008, as far as I can tell. And yes, any country can buy Laptops (except for countries under US embargo, apparently). --Mokurai 19:25, 28 October 2006 (EDT)

Remember: check second hand websites. Plenty of OLPC's for sale.

FOR 150.- Dollar! (To elemantary schools etc. its a perfect machine.) And then you can go down with the price for poor countrys about 50.-$, better!

I'd just like to add that, as a British university student, I would personally pay up to maybe £250 ($300 - $350 USD?) to have one of these for myself, and would be happy to spend a good £50-100 extra on top of this as long as I knew that ALL the money I spent was going to help lower the costs of distributing these in schools around the world. Portable, durable, reliable, small, Linux (I'm assuming this version is user-friendly?), lots of USB ports, no higher spec than is neccessary, the sort of thing I could take everywhere I go without worry, and it has a crank handle (absolute genius!!!) - it's perfect!


There's a hell of a lot of people who want nothing more than a simple, portable, reliable typing machine with USB and optional internet, and who'd be happy to pay extra for a good cause and a guarentee that they weren't being ripped off by something badly made. Unlike every other computer manufacturer in the world you satisfy all of these criteria. It'd be a very simple way to modestly boost fundraising and awareness. Plus it'd make people like me very happy!

Nice :-)
Make it with a different color case(grey) and stamp a logo and message into the cover (like Apple does in their laptops). The message would say "I donated to the OLPC project". This way you prevent the real units being diverted into the 1st world retail stream.

Totally agree. 4 good reasons to let everybody to buy it :

  1. I'm a software developper and I'm very interrested to pay twice the price for a OLPC laptop. Then I could easily create and test software that works well on it.
  2. The twice of the target price is not so high compared to many "test computers" and still can give financial support to the project.
  3. Another interresting border effect is that a critical mass is reached faster. The scale that permit a production/shipping price under the target price.
  4. I'm interrested to buy this kind of educationnal tool for my own children. This is more interresting than a game console but not more expensive. More, this is a good platform for educationnal games.
(KEF, Belgium)
Gooda agree with that - the thing is cute enough, light enough - eco-friendly enough, etc, etc - Americans will pay $300 or $400 for these things - so "Buy one - get two others for <country of your choice> free" would be a great way to get them 'out there'. Furthermore - you know that the more educated geeks have these things - the more clever software will be written for them - and the more you sell, the lower the price. Heck - put up a pre-order form and you'll get my $400 today. I'm off to read more technical specs. SteveBaker - Texas, USA
There is obviously a lot of interest in other countries. I think you should really try and get some serious publicity in the USA.

Frankly i disagree. First world countries have no direct need instead should be motivated to fund this milestone project. I could see however how certain small and special project in the US could also make use of this laptop however there should be a consistency in the target group that the cannot afford the laptop.

I think it would be very sensible to allow access to these computers for richer individuals, if only to encourage development of literature and educational materials availability internationally.

Imagine a gadget that a poor kid in rural India could get her hands on, but I couldn't! Preposterous! "Daddy, I want an Oompa Loompa". New post: I had the same idea as another poster above, to sell them for a higher amount to those that can afford them, with the extra profit going towards lowering the cost for those less able to pay the full price for them. Allowing us to donate money might also be an option. My only concern is that something be done to remove the "devil horns" for the final design... :-) CN, Minneapolis

Could you get the next generation off of staggered QWERTY keyboards?

First, congratulations! This is a wonderful project that plenty of folks said couldn't be done. Since your targetted users have no investment in the legacy typewriter keyboard, I really wish you could take this opportunity to move the world off of the darned things.

QWERTY keyboards are only used in countries with a Latin-based alphabet. Many of the target countries will not use QWERTY because they have a totally different writing system.

The keyboard layouts for Korean and the languages of India have the vowels under one hand and consonants under the other. The arrangement of consonant keys is somewhat systematic and therefore mnemonic. I learned Hangeul layout much faster than Dvorak. But that is not an issue that OLPC has anything to say about.

Many of the target countries DO have a substantial investment in their existing typewriter keyboard layouts.

Could you provide a keyboard with the keys arranged in columns, with a more sensible layout as the default?

Can you cite any studies that demonstrate columnar arrangements to be superior to staggered arrangements. I suspect that staggered arrangements are better for fast typists.

The only historical reason for staggered column keyboards is that it allowed the typebars to be equally spaced on manual typewriters. This writer has lost hours (over 25 years of professional writing) to the staggered positions of B, 6, and ` on staggered QWERTY layouts, and even some time to X in Dvorak. That includes time taken to look for a key, and time to correct errors. The problem is greatest in the early stages of learning.

I don't know about you, but I can't really manage my pinky going straight up as easy as up and out. The staggered feel is much more comfortable; although I do use a modified attack (my left index finger handles both Y and F; my right handles D and X. I'm on dvorak).

SHIFT and BACKSPACE under the thumbs somehow instead of the pinkies? Seems like this is the *ideal* opportunity to get a new generation of users onto a better typing foundation -- faster learning, faster typing, fewer errors, less stress on the tendons, etc. Your volumes are such that the development of inexpensive keyboards that match your design would be inevitable.

Getting the next generation of users on a decent keyboard would do the world a big favor (to add to the HUGE favor you are already doing it!).

You misunderstand the goals of the OLPC and the customers. The goal is to educate children but the customers are national Ministries of Education. It is up to them to choose the keyboard layout.

-perhaps there could be a site for sugestions of keyboard layouts to be chosen between for the ministries.of.educations to choose between - a presentation of different options/suggestions may make their decisions easier, otherwise they may not consider an alternative to 'convention'. a new generation of keyboard layout culd be a very progressive move in computing.


What happens when a kid nukes the software on his/her computer?

Is there a way to wipe everything and start again, if a kid accidently screws up a config file or what not? --Stranger 00:57, 14 June 2006 (EDT)

In addition to booting from the flash disk in the laptop, you can also boot from a flash disk attached to one of the USB ports on the laptop. This flash disk can have a program that repairs any damaged files on the internal flash disk. It can also nuke the disk and re-install from scratch. Eventually it may be possible to do this over the Wi-Fi network too, but that is more of a wish than a plan. Tef
I think it's important to remember that you can't hug your children with nuclear arms, especially when dealing with childrens' machines. --Bluefoxicy 17:03, 23 September 2006 (EDT)

Constructionist learning software: eToys?

Will there be room on the laptop for Alan Kay's Squeakland http://www.squeakland.org/ and its eToys, and for Scratch http://llk.media.mit.edu/projects/summaries/scratch.shtml ? -- David, June 2006

Yes! This was answered here Talk:Squeak -- David, July 2006

Papua New Guinea

Please include Papua New Guinea in this project. The children there are so desparately disadvantaged and PNG seems to slide under the radar of US charity projects :) And while I am mentioning the overlooked poor, how about considering the children of the South Pacific Islands- Tonga, Nuie Is, Cook Is, Samoa etc.

You are welcome to create OLPC Papua New Guinea, or any others that you want, and to lobby the governments there.

Hardware question: CCF vs LED

This question was actually prompted by the seemingly innocent statement about the laptop's screen being the brightest light in a third-world home at night. Wouldn't white LED's be cheaper and have a longer lifespan than the CCF's and required inverters that typically are used in LCD displays? Not to mention the effect that they would have on the total wattage required?

Note that this is an unofficial answer. This has been discussed in other places this is just my understanding.
The OLPC laptop does not use CCFs (Cold-Cathode Fluorescent)backlights. They are too fragle and power hungry. They actually use LEDs for backlighting in color mode. (I think they use Red Green and Blue LEDs in an innovative way that I can't explain.) Also in section 4 of this news letter the addition of two LEDs for keyboard illumination was discussed. (The news letter also discussed the origin of the brightest light in the house story.) tef

Public availability?

I heard a rumor over the weekend that the laptops would be publically available at triple-cost, with one third going to the purchased unit and two thirds going to purchase two more for children. Any thoughts on this? I know the site says that the systems are primarily focussed towards government level purchases for education, but I heard this and thought this at least was a cool idea. --Drew, Chicago, IL

  • Update: I found the info on this. Check out [4]; they're collecting pledges from 100k people to pull this off.
See also Retail.


OLPC & UNPO Members

N.B. UNPO => Unrepresented Nations and Peoples Organization

Many regions are not represented by an official government. Kosovo, Somaliland, Iraqi Kurdistan and many refugee camp as Dafur/Mali, Myanmar/Thailand border,... have no chance to get support from any government. (see UNPO) Normally the United Nations gives some support, but the people have no work and the people are bored.

Especially for these people, education is very important. It is also important to give them a voice with which to tell about their lives. The 100$ laptop and a internet link could improve the situation of this people very much.

These regions are too small to order one million laptops but all this regions together have more then 1 million children. Is there a special program for these children? There is no government to talk with, but the UN together with NGOs could do a lot.

Many people ask if it's possible to give some money for the OLPC project. If there is some money, this regions should be the first that receive sponsored laptops. One million children with the ability to send text and videos from daily life as a refugee could change the world. --Bz 09:28, 27 January 2007 (EST)

There are plans to extend invitations to NGOs after the first phase—OLPC currently targets only national governments.
Community sponsoring (ie: Buy 2 Get 1) is not being contemplated as an option in the near future—maybe later.--Xavi 10:21, 27 January 2007 (EST)

OLPC & United Nations

Will the new leadership at the United Nations affect the laptop.org program in general? --216.194.7.160 18:08, 26 December 2006 (EST)

Probably not, given that neither dependends on the other. AFAIK, agreements have been signed with the U.N.'s Development Program.--Xavi 11:44, 27 December 2006 (EST)

What are the Pros and Cons of OLPC?

This is also discussed on various question pages, including OLPC FAQ and Ask OLPC a Question. --Mokurai 17:45, 9 November 2006 (EST)


There are a number of naysayers claiming that the OLPC project will never work for various alleged reasons. Most prominent among them are Bill Gates and John C. Dvorak. Dvorak's recent attack, posted on MSN Marketwatch is a misch-masch of straw men, ad hominem attacks, and ignorance, in my opinion. More than 400 comments have appeared on Slashdot. The Linux community is of the opinion that Gates is opposed to the laptop purely because it runs Linux and other Free Software, and that Dvorak, once a respected voice in the industry, is shilling for Gates. --Mokurai 06:59, 21 November 2006 (EST)

Public traded company?

I am wondering if olpc is a public traded company and if not are there any plans of this happining in the near future?

US non-profit corporation, so no. You could start your own company to buy from or sell to the families of the children. (But not to sell the laptop.)--Mokurai 02:23, 13 October 2006 (EDT)

Background in pedagogy?

Do any of the OLPC designers have experience with teaching young children, especially ones in the third world?

It is best to read through some of the site or use the Search button at the left before asking questions. Or are you questioning the management's competence in making the decision to assign technical design experts to do the design instead of pedagogues? Read the constructivist page to begin with and then check the backgrounds of the people who are running the OLPC project. You couldn't ask for more solid educational credentials.
The question was to try to find out to what extent unusual aspects of the system (sugar, social chat-oriented software) were validated by experience teaching young children. From what I have seen of the OLPC staff backgrounds, they're generally university people, surely a very different demographic.
Seymour Papert has been involved in elementary school classroom software for decades. See his book Mindstorms. Alan Kay managed the design of computers suitable for children at Xerox PARC in the 1970s. His Alto computer and Smalltalk software were the original GUI system that became the model for the Apple Macintosh, the X windowing system for UNIX, and Microsoft Windows. There are other educational software developers and classroom teachers in OLPC.
In addition, the concept of One Laptop Per Child has reportedly been validated in classrooms in Maine and Cambodia, using conventional commercial laptops. Some of us are eagerly awaiting the research reports on these deployments. --Mokurai 05:55, 7 November 2006 (EST)
That reported validation indeed sounds exciting, but where are the reports?

Statistics

I would like more information about the Nations that are involved with the OLPC program as far as statistics and population information!

You can find out information about statistics here. Also, some countries have an infobox with an abstract.

About the Colors

What is the difference (apart from the color) between the Orange and Green machines? .--Ahmad 11:36, 27 October 2006 (GMT+1)

There are no Orange or Green machines. There are only prototype boards and components in various stages. Pictures with Orange and Green machines used plastic models or case prototypes. They are just there as pretty pictures to give a rough idea of what a finished unit MIGHT be.
Green ones now exist: B1 Pictures. --66.30.117.127 16:53, 9 January 2007 (EST)

What does XO stand for ?

Nothing really. It is simply a shorthand reference to the shape of the icon which is used to represent a user of the mesh network. The icon represents a person with arms outstretched, jumping for joy. It looks like an O stacked above an X. Some people don't like it.

History

I am curious about the history of this project: when was it started, by whom, how it has evolved, etc.

Some of this information is being collected on the History of OLPC page. You may also find some information on Wikipedia however the best way is to Google for information on Nicholas Negroponte and Seymour Papert.


Rwanda

I would like more infromation about Rwanda.

Rwanda has recently joined the OLPC program. You can find out more information about them at this link [5]


Theft of laptops from children

Perhaps it would be possible to use facial/voice recognition software and the laptop camera/microphone to ensure that the laptop will only work if one child (selected by an administrator using a complex password) is using it. (This would avoid situations where the child might give up a password under duress)?

Wouldn't adding those extra features also significantly increase the price of the OLPC as well? Why not use the OLPC's built-in wifi adapter to track the signal and MAC address instead?

Wifi adapter as an anti-theft device?

yes I agree. I also think it would be useful to turn the built-in wifi adapter as an anti-theft device. The adapter should be made to start mandatorily at boot up and not allowed to disable it so that in the event that the laptop is stolen it will be trackable by using war driving software.


For information about such security topics, see the Bitfrost specification. --Jacobolus 19:20, 17 February 2007 (EST)


Who articulated this "need"? The local communities or the MIT?

Please provide details on the quantity and conditions under which chiefs, local leaders and/or community decision makers expressed the need for such a laptop. Additional details on the consultations, focus groups and design meetings that must have occurred world-wide are are also welcomed.

The Peace Corps has for a number of years encouraged volunteers to take laptops and leave them behind. They leave those laptops with technically inquisitive individuals. This program has shown a good bit of promise, despite infrastructure shortcoming in many host nations. *Peace corps distributes laptops *Every single problem is solved with education -Jeff 21:39, 9 March 2007 (EST)

Thanks Jeff, I understand many countries and organizations in the north have a long history of "leaving behind" goods because they assume "poor" people need them. However, I am afraid this does not answer my question. There are two ways in which the answer is misleading:

1. The peace corps article talks about what seems to be a very focused project (GLOBE) involving particular schools in a particular community within a local program for a particular purpose. Thus, it is more likely that local user groups were directly involved in its deployment. The OLPC project does not seem to share these qualities. So I don't think the Guinea's GLOBE project justifies OLPC at all. Also, the second link has no information that may help to answer the question... perhaps you posted the wrong link?
2. When compared to a "leaving behind" philosophy, the OLPC may be considered a "top-down" approach to aid. There is a long history of costly "interventions" with only marginal gains related to this paradigm. I was assuming the OLPC was aware of one the most important lessons learned in the las century regarding aid and international development: that top-down approaches rarely have long lasting effects in developing the capacity of the host country and, in many cases, they even help exacerbate the local processes of exploitation. The OLPC project goes a long way in ensuring that children will truly own the technology they are given by using open-source software, but it seems to have failed to take into account the needs as expressed by the local user groups.

In conclusion, from your answer, I can only assume that:

1. No local chiefs, leaders of community representatives were consulted and,
2. No focus groups and/or design meetings took place with local user groups.

is this correct?

Look, the OLPC has a vision. You can argue the vision, thump your chest, demand study groups and research, and provide negative opinions. I don't know about these meetings you are concerned about, I'm not an official OLPC representative (and they probably won't rise to the bait you offer). Your questions seem focused towards discrediting OLPC rather than providing positive guidance. In my experience, consulting potential system users is a mixed bag. While users can articulate how things work, they often can not envision or articulate how things could work differently. If you want to help OLPC, create an account on the wiki and we can discuss your concerns on discussion pages. I'm just one man who would like to see OLPC suceed. -Jeff 11:12, 13 March 2007 (EDT)

Jeff, I am sorry if my questions made you think that I am "focused on discrediting the OLPC rather than providing positive guidance". Please accept my apologies, I tried to frame my questions/comments clearly so there would be no space for misunderstandings. I am not demanding any study groups and/or research, nor offering any bait (regarding thumping your chest, I don't know what you mean). I simply asked if these studies existed and commented on the related historical lessons learned in the field of international development. I also understand official OLPC representatives have better things to do than responding to anonymous criticism, so thank you for the time you have spent responding to mine. I still hope it may be considered constructive.

That said, I will comment on just one of the many examples of "my concerns" with top-down approaches. The following link provides some general information: http://www.answers.com/topic/sanitation-in-developing-countries

The following paragraph is particularly interesting:

The 1980s were designated the International Drinking Water Supply and Sanitation Decade by the United Nations. Despite the efforts of this campaign, however, in many countries more than half the rural populations are without adequate water supply access and sanitation. Many of the failures can be explained by weaknesses in the design and implementation of projects, as evidenced by many abandoned water and wastewater treatment plants. Such weaknesses often stem from a lack of maintenance caused by failures in equipment or training. A widespread lack of community participation in projects also helps explain failures.

I have experience from one of such projects in Haiti: a group of highly qualified engineers was hired to design a local water distribution system for a small farming community. Before then, people had to walk for hours to a nearby river and walk back home with their buckets filled. The facility built for them included different levels with water tanks of varying qualities to fulfill a variety of needs: human drinking water, animal drinking water and water for farming. The design was phenomenal and very promising. However, a few months after its construction, evaluation documents reported that people were not using the facilities. Moreover, they were significantly run down, taps had been knocked out of place, and because of that, the tanks had been emptied. When asked about these findings, local farmers mentioned the design was completely incompatible with their practices. They had to knock off the taps because otherwise they could not let their animals drink by themselves. They were also more used to running water, rather than stationary water, so it didn't make sense to them to keep the water in the tanks. Women stated they preferred walking to the river because it was the only opportunity they had in the day to talk to each other and exchange recipes.

Another View You seem like a person that has a lot of interest and knowledge about Developing Nations! Part of the many issues of sustainability is progress. Just 10 years ago think of all the tribal leaders that shunned the 40E program for TB of years before and other vaccination program as saying, “This was no good.” But today the world is changing, many things that years ago people did not think they needed they have come to rely upon greatly! I guess computers are part of the world and there those that believe that this part of progress could be useful to those local Chieftains and Clan leaders too. I personally think this will be good for the world in general. You never know one of the future inventors of something important or useful might be the little one lappy olpc laptop child of today!


Self-winding generator

Regarding the energy source for the machine - I would love to imagine children walking or running to school or home with their machines swinging along. Since The Crank is out, how about self-winding, through movement? I have a 40-year old watch that does it. Have you thought about using self-winding as some part of the power question? Creators, commence!

This is brilliant! My niece and nephew recently gave me a flashlight that is charged by shaking a weight back and forth through windings where the D cell batteries would go in handle of "normal" flashpoint. It is very low power LED bulb but the accumulated energy could be significant. Something similar but maybe with steel balls to roll around a racetrack or arc designed for ergonomic motions in a couple of different walking "games" would charge the power storage all the way home or to school! We need to find an ergonomics specialist to help (and maybe a child pyschologist or game specialist) and an electrical engineer to design the circuits for the generator ..... maybe we could find some soon at Wikiversity? ... or we could track down someone knowledgeable from the power summit recently held. Power summit for One Laptop Per Child project[6] .... I am not sure how to proceed. I am currently trying to get a pedagogy project going http://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Self_Paced_Reading_Labs. I do not have time for this but the kids need power to access the internet and get to Wikiversity. 8( Maybe someone will pick your idea up. It is a really good one. Mirwin 13:59, 11 February 2007 (EST)

Nicholas Negroponte

Hello - how can I get involved and help Nicholas with his $100 laptop project? I am an accountant by trade and am looking to get involved in the voluntary sectory. I should be grateful if you would pass this message on to him. Many thanks - ankit.dodhia@hotmail.com

Wish there was a version of Fedora with the Sugar os, so they could be put on existing low end laptops and desktops. That would be great for schools that have older hardware, so they do not have to purchase newer machines. Great budget saver and great pr for RedHat also. just a thought...

Using QEMU on Windows XP --Jeff

Is there a better alternative?

Could the children be better prepared for life learning to use, as I and MILLIONS of others had, with a BIG CHEIF tablet and a pencil (yet somehow I am computer literate now)? Total cost for pad and pencil: $2.75 ... left over for food and medical from the initial $150: $147.50.

This question ignores a very important part of the economic equation. Textbooks. The cost of primary school textbooks is kept hidden from most of us but a trip to a college bookstore will show you that textbooks cost a lot of money. The primary economic enabler of the OLPC laptops is that they allow textbooks to be distributed very cheaply. Compared to physical textbooks, electronic ones don't have to be printed and they can be shipped on very low-weight media such as CD-ROMs. Of course, in order to realize the economic benefit of electronic textbooks, you first have to invest in an e-book reader. That is the core of the OLPC project. If you investigate existing e-book reader projects you will dicsover that they are all based around a general-purpose computer with some software that restricts the capabilities to only reading books. The OLPC project goal is to create an e-book reader that exploits as many of the capabilities of the hardware as possible. The end-result is a single device that can serve many different educational functions and is versatile enough to be used throughout the student's educational life and beyond. --Memracom 05:15, 13 January 2007 (EST)
This goes beyond textbooks. Computers are one of the most fundamental learning tools available to the modern world. Children do need to learn reading and writing with crayons, paper, pencils, and all that good stuff. But millions of children have already grown up learning with the assistance of computers. In my own education, computers have leant a fluidity to my work that I can not acheive with a pencil eraser. "The end-result is a single device that can serve many different educational functions and is versatile enough to be used throughout the student's educational life and beyond." Memracom's words are spot on. -Jeff 21:55, 9 March 2007 (EST)

November 2007 or later

Differences between G1G1 XO's and the XO's that will be sent to Least Developed Countries (split, answered)

Bitfrost Activation

I think LDC XO's will have Bitfrost security installed, and will need to be unlocked at their destination (by the school servers I guess), and Donor XO's won't have Bitfrost.

All laptops have Bitfrost installed for inter-activity isolation. Once all the bugs are fixed, this will protect the user from malware. G1G1 laptops will be pre-activated with a non-expiring lease. G1G1 laptop developer keys might be made available on a web server. 24.110.145.202 12:51, 19 November 2007 (EST)

Other differences

Will there be any other operating system or activity differences between the Donor XO's and the world's?

G1G1 might get SimCity. Non-G1G1 will likely come with country-specific software, frequently including things that are blocked by software patents in the USA. 24.110.145.202 12:51, 19 November 2007 (EST)

Dealing with the lack of a School Server

If G1G1 units won't be expected to ever connect to a school server, will that have any implications for how they are maintained that won't apply to LDC XO's? If so, would it be possible for a home user in North America to configure a standard desktop to perform some of the services for his XO that school servers will do around the world? I'm thinking of backup and software updating in particular.

Sure, go ahead, we could do with more testers for the school server software. But you might find that using ordinary SSH based tools will be simpler. --Quozl 18:47, 19 November 2007 (EST)
Oh, Quozl, if you only knew how deep the chasm is between your world and mine. Between the way you view the world, and the way I do. While I have no doubt that I am, in fact, capable of discovering what "ordinary SSH based tools" are, which I suspect puts me in a very attenuated subset of North American G1G1 participants, I have no inclination to do so, and certainly no time to even if I were inclined. Don't get me wrong, I appreciate your diligent patience in helping to maintain this wiki. But my question and my goals are more modest. Let me rephrase this sub-question a bit, and break it into some smaller chunks:
  • What services will school servers perform for XO's out in the field?
Internet provision and filtering, mesh network management, content caching, software provisioning, file sharing, and backups. --Quozl 16:55, 20 November 2007 (EST)
  • Will G1G1 XO's suffer from not having these services performed?
Yes, in that they won't have the same functions available to them. --Quozl 16:55, 20 November 2007 (EST)
  • Could there be ways for G1G1 participants to compensate for the lack of school servers?
Yes. --Quozl 16:55, 20 November 2007 (EST)
  • Has anyone in the wide OLPC community been thinking about this already? If so, where do they gather? Hexagonal
Hope so, but don't know. I've certainly thought about it. Please form a community around this Wiki. See XO_Giving/Users. --Quozl 03:04, 21 November 2007 (EST)
Sorry about that, there's no way I can know how much you know, so I'm glad you've asked me to explain. The XO software contains an SSH server, which provides SCP or SFTP functions. These functions can be used for backup. By ordinary SSH based tools I mean things like PuTTY, winSCP, SSHFS, Konqueror's fish URL format, and a host of other things, see Comparison of SSH clients for more details, especially note the SFTP and SCP column in the function table. Putting it another way, you can drag and drop to do backups if you like, or you can script them, you just need some suitable software on your other computers. --Quozl 16:55, 20 November 2007 (EST)

Batteries

Finally, I've learned from this wiki that there are two types of batteries that will be XO original equipment. Which type is better suited for use in North America? Is that the type that will be sent to Give One, Get One participants?

Both types are suited for use in North American temperature ranges. The lithium battery has less mass, but North Americans are sufficiently strong to carry either type. I haven't seen a decision on which one will be used, but it shouldn't really matter that much, since they are operationally equivalent. --Quozl 18:47, 19 November 2007 (EST)

Bold text

Give One, Get One Implementation Questions (split, answered)

Estimated G1G1 Shipping Date

Will the unresolved bugs tracked by the developers that are flagged with the "Update.1" milestone be addressed in the G1G1 units? According to http://dev.laptop.org/roadmap code freeze for Update.1 occurred on 11/1/07, and changes made through Update.1 will be included in XO's made for G1G1 deployment. And this milestone currently has a date of 12/1/07. So I assume that bug fixes to the system will continue to occur until 11/30/07, and Quanta will install code that includes everything flagged Update.1 that the developers can fix. So I assume actual final assembly of XO's intended for US/Canadian G1G1 delivery will start sometime AFTER 12/1/07. Can someone who's actually involved in all this let us know what's going on?

The G1G1 units will ship as soon as mass production has fulfilled OLPC's existing contracts with the countries (such as Uruguay) who have bought large quantities of the laptops. I don't think anyone knows that date exactly yet; it depends on what kinks need to be worked out in the mass production factory; and how quickly the purchasing countries can get their first shipments of laptops out to the schools and kids (and thus need more to arrive). The software loaded onto the G1G1 laptops will be the best stable software that OLPC has at that point. The software will be upgradeable after you receive it -- either directly over a wireless Internet connection, or via a USB memory stick or a USB wired ethernet adapter. Indeed, it will be upgradeable for years to come, and we expect it to get much better over time. I am not "someone who's actually involved in all this", but I've been watching it pretty closely from outside. -- gnu, 19 Nov 2007
Thank you, gnu, for this response. You're too modest about your level of involvement, according to your wiki contribution history. I appreciate your taking a stab at answering this question. I should say that I don't doubt that the G1G1's will arrive with the best stable software available; I'm really trying to learn what dev.laptop.org bugs will be resolved as a way of learning about the process, since it's so unusually accessible to me. Here's another tidbit of info I'll pass along fwiw: I haven't been calling the toll-free G1G1 donor service number, not feeling the need to burden them, but on 11/19 an unregistered contributor to XO_Giving added the following to the "When will the laptops be delivered?" section:
As of 11/19, the donor service line indicated that orders placed on Friday, 11/16, at least, are part of the 'second shipment.' There's no indication of when this second shipment will go out, but it will be later than the first shipment scheduled, as of 11/19, for mid-December.
Let me say that as a G1G1 participant I understand the uncertainties inherent in mass production. I also will not be surprised or disappointed if Uruguay's XO's are produced before my G1G1's are. I take to heart MitchelNCharity's points (found at Talk:XO_Giving#Using_testing_for_expectation_management ). That being said, I'd say my expectation is that G1G1 participants will be informed about delivery details as soon as they are known by the OLPC folks in Massachusetts.
So, how many units are being made for Uruguay? What other firm country contracts are there as of 11/20? For how many units? If other countries commit between now and mid-December, will the first G1G1 shipments be bumped back in the queue? Hexagonal 09:49, 20 November 2007 (EST)
Update (11/12/07): A poster on an external website just shared an e-mail he received from OLPC donor services:
Dear ____:
We are currently producing laptops as they are requested. The first phase is expected to ship out just prior to the Holiday's (mid December). The following ship times can range up to 4 months. We will be using UPS as our shipping carrier.
No Solar Panel will be sent with the laptops, this item is not yet available but should be within the next 12 months. All the laptops will come with an AC Adapter. It will also come with 2 more power sources it can either be a foot pedal, pull cord, or a crank. At this time we are not able to inform our donors which one their laptop will have.
Thank you for your interest in One Laptop Per Child.
OLPC Donor Services
Now, combine the info in this e-mail with two separate contributions to the XO_Giving page's "When will the laptops be delivered?" section:
According to this CNN article, it will depend on the order date, where the first 20,000 ordered are estimated to arrive before Christmas and the others later. However, point 5 of the Give-One-Get-One Terms and Conditions expressly states that delivery may be subject to delays, so there are no certain delivery dates. —Joe 11:48, 15 November 2007 (EST).
As of 11/19, the donor service line indicated that orders placed on Friday, 11/16, at least, are part of the 'second shipment.' There's no indication of when this second shipment will go out, but it will be later than the first shipment scheduled, as of 11/19, for mid-December.
The implication is that about 20,000 G1G1's were ordered by close of business on Thursday, 11/15; that those 20,000 will go out in the first wave of UPS shipments mid-December; and that G1G1's ordered after 11/15 will probably arrive sometime in the first quarter of 2008. Please take this string of suppositions as merely that. ~ Hexagonal 11:20, 21 November 2007 (EST)


G1G1 Volume

How many G1G1 laptops have been ordered so far? How many firm country orders do you have as of today?

According to an 11/24/07 Wall Street Journal article ( currently found here, though this may be an expiring link), "Mr. Negroponte says there were about 45,000 two-laptop orders in the first nine days, with nearly half coming on the first day." ~ Hexagonal 10:04, 24 November 2007 (EST)


Subsequent Updates

Will G1G1 owners be able to download system and application updates online from a central OLPC website? Or will we download updates to a USB flash drive on our "big" computer, and then boot our XO from that, which seems to be the way updates are being distributed to beta testers currently? As new activities are added to XO systems, will G1G1 owners be able to download and install those activities?

All OLPC software will be available to G1G1 owners for direct installation over the network. This will remain true for the life of the project; thus, over the next few years, you can expect to install periodic upgrades that improve the system. Ben 10:12, 20 November 2007 (EST)
Also, since the software is open source, or redistributable without hindrance, there is nothing stopping another community filling any functional gap that OLPC leaves. Once a critical mass of interested people exists, you will not be orphaned ... until the hardware becomes so old as to be uninteresting. --Quozl 16:26, 20 November 2007 (EST)

Exterior XO Logo Colors

Will the colors of the XO Logo on the case exterior vary at random? Will two G1G1 laptops shipped to the same address have different colors?

There are 400 different color combinations; they are chosen at random so there is a high probability that two G1G1 laptops shipped to the same address will have different colors.

Sim City

Will Sim City be on the G1G1 North American XO's?

I don't know if SimCity will be shipped on the machines, but note that it's very easy to install via an internet connection (or so I've found in an emulator): Just open the XO's Web activity, navigate to the SimCity page on this wiki, then click on the SimCity-1.xo link; the activity downloads and installs automatically. —Joe 15:39, 17 November 2007 (EST)
Thanks! Hexagonal 09:57, 20 November 2007 (EST)

Give 1, Get 1 questions

  1. I read that there is a limited number for this program and they will sell out in minutes. What time exactly will the program open? (time zone specific?) I want to be sure to get one when available.
  2. I would like some info on what the computer includes as it will be sold in US for this program. I have read all the technical articles, etc., but I'm not a technology geek, so I'd like some plain words. Also, will we be able to download updates and additional programs as they are developed?
  3. Will the version sold in US for the G1, G1 promotion include an alternate recharging source, or have one available as an option? (solar panel,crank, etc.) I would like to have this option, even though most of the time I will plug it in to recharge. There are times when I will want to use an alternate source of energy (camping trips, etc.)

Thanks for your info

Well, let's see if we can resolve some of this for you!
1. Here's the relevant text from an email OLPC sent out on November 9:
You are receiving this email because you requested a reminder from One Laptop per Child about our limited-time "Give One Get One" program. Starting Monday, November 12 at 6:00am EST, you will be able to donate one XO laptop to a child in the developing world and also receive a laptop for the child in your life, by visiting www.laptopgiving.org[7] or calling toll-free 1-877-70-LAPTOP.
2. Regarding the contents of the G1G1 package that you would receive, we'll probably know more after November 12. Right now, there's not much available other than what you can find in the Hardware specification of this wiki, and that nearly lists what might be available. Regarding software, though, if you look at the software over on the Activities page, it looks like any typical open source library - lots of different programs with new builds and releases being issued all the time. I don't think this will be a problem.
3. Sorry, I couldn't find out anything here regarding specifics about what will be shipped with the G1G1 program. (I'd like to know myself!) --Valichi 16:30, 9 November 2007 (EST)
High-res unboxing photos of a G1G1 production unit were posted by Morgan Collett on Wednesday, December 5, 2007. Here's a direct link to the flickr set. Looks like we'll get a battery, an AC adaptor, and a 4-page manual. ~ Hexagonal 11:21, 5 December 2007 (EST)

Forth in Open Firmware

Is there a usable Forth interpreter one can experiment with and learn from in the firmware?

Apparently, the firmware's Forth interpreter is user-accessible (see instructions in the Open Firmware FAQ). —Joe 12:55, 26 October 2007 (EDT)
Okay, that is OFFICIALLY very cool! lol... Thanks for answering, Joe! I'm really looking forward to the "Buy two, get one" in November. :)
Personal tools
  • Log in
  • Login with OpenID
About OLPC
About the laptop
About the tablet
Projects
OLPC wiki
Toolbox