Bityi (translating code editor): Difference between revisions
m (Bityi moved to Bityi (translating code editor): compromise, name with short description) |
(→Name) |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
==Name== |
==Name== |
||
The word "bityi" is drawn from John Wilkins's 1664 artificial language. It is the word for language number 42 (bi- discourse; t-5th of 9 subgenuses ; yi- 8th of 9 subspecies): in Douglas Adams's world of the babel fish, this would be the Final Answer Language. Obviously, such a linguistically triumphalistic name is meant |
The word "bityi" is drawn from John Wilkins's 1664 artificial language. It is the word for language number 42 (bi- discourse; t-5th of 9 subgenuses ; yi- 8th of 9 subspecies): in Douglas Adams's world of the babel fish, this would be the Final Answer Language. Obviously, such a linguistically triumphalistic name is meant ironically: Wilkins's language is best known as the butt of one of Borges's intricate jokes, and the "final answer" of 42 is no good to anyone without a question. I hope that this project will be successful, but it can only avoid the pitfalls of previous Grand Linguistic Plans if it focuses on being as useful and unobtrusive as possible and NOT on being a total solution for everything. |
Revision as of 17:58, 20 August 2007
Source-code editor with transparent native-language display
Almost all programming is done in programming "languages" based on English. These are really codes, much less than languages, with a limited vocabulary. Still, it's a significant barrier for other-language programmers, especially young ones. A modern computer, even a cheap one, would have no trouble doing transparent, real-time translation into the user's natural language. For instance, on disk you'd have python "if ... else...", but on screen, you'd see (and write) "si... sino..." (spanish).
Current design thoughts...
are at Source-code editor with transparent native-language display/design.
Older discussion
has been moved to the talk page.
Name
The word "bityi" is drawn from John Wilkins's 1664 artificial language. It is the word for language number 42 (bi- discourse; t-5th of 9 subgenuses ; yi- 8th of 9 subspecies): in Douglas Adams's world of the babel fish, this would be the Final Answer Language. Obviously, such a linguistically triumphalistic name is meant ironically: Wilkins's language is best known as the butt of one of Borges's intricate jokes, and the "final answer" of 42 is no good to anyone without a question. I hope that this project will be successful, but it can only avoid the pitfalls of previous Grand Linguistic Plans if it focuses on being as useful and unobtrusive as possible and NOT on being a total solution for everything.