User:Dagista

From OLPC
Revision as of 14:08, 18 March 2009 by Dagista (talk | contribs) (University & Royal Institute of Technology_Sweden)
Jump to: navigation, search

Dalarna University & Royal Institute of Technology_Sweden

Universities: Dalarna University & KTH, Sweden
Team Name: OLPCorps_Ethio_Swed
Team Memembers: Dagmawi S. Tesfa, Demerew K. Tesfaye
Deployment country: Ethiopia

Proposal
What are the key elements for success? Learning environments are transformed:

   * Educators involved in laptop programs … promote collaborative learning and … provide individualized instruction;
         o students and teachers move around more. Instead of staying put to do “seat work”, students gather to work on projects;
         o (this) frees teachers to roam about the room helping those who have problems or need remediation;
         o learning in laptop classrooms is often more self-directed. 

Assessment techniques change:

   * Teachers in laptop classrooms are more willing to assign presentations and multimedia projects to students, and score them using customized, project-driven rubrics and even self-assessments. 

Students are highly engaged: Like teachers, students also show improved technology skills and sophistication. Productivity increase: Students develop better organizational skills because they are needed to keep track of what's on their computer and to accomplish complex project work in a timely manner. Attitudes toward writing improve:

   * 76% of students said they enjoy writing more on the laptops than on paper;
   * 80% indicated laptops make it easier to rewrite and revise their writing;
   * 73% said they earn better grades for laptop work; 

The data demonstrate shifts in not only students' writing attitudes, but also in their practices. These are changes we've also observed in language arts teachers' writing instruction strategies, and in the attitudes and practices of other content area teachers.

How can we best prepare our teachers to make the most use of this initiative? Connected laptops enable new approaches to teacher preparation beyond standardized, centralized, hierarchical approaches. We can create pockets of excellence, connected communities of practice, strong exemplars of powerful learning activities, new content, and mechanisms for the spread of ideas. A significant impact of OLPC will be the degree to which connectivity affords support to the teachers. Typical “training” efforts have been limited by the amount of time and the degree of access to the teachers in order to support their ongoing development. Because OLPC ensures that teachers will have their own laptops and high-bandwidth connectivity, we have a means of supporting them that previously did not exist. Teachers, parents, and concerned experts can join in to create new learning networks to improve educational thinking and practices.

We certainly don't need to train children how to use the laptop. Likewise, approaches that infantilize teachers, or do not respect them or believe in their capabilities, or only focus on teaching IT skills and office tools, have proven to have limited impact on education despite the investment of millions of dollars. The point is not to have teachers re-create the same lessons in PowerPoint. The point is to help them learn using technology and reflect on this learning. We need to engage them in those learning methodologies that are enhanced by connected laptops: the design and construction of personally meaningful objects using a variety of computational and traditional materials—a more diversified, humanistic, holistic approach to learning than previously was logistically possible. This process is ultimately liberating. when children bring the laptops home with them, many parents began adult education courses at night using the laptops. Many families chose to move into communities with laptop programs. Children develop the skills to do normal maintenance on their laptops. Most important, though, is that the children engage more deeply in learning and school work over the year; the computer helps deepen this interaction.

The typical measures of test scores and years in school are important, but miss the key points that make quality education critical for human and social development. A child who learns to read but hates it so much that he refuses to read may test well, but is really an example of educational system failure. A child who does not learn to think, imagine, and create with or without new technology will have difficulty with full social and economic inclusion in the modern world

Proposal contents:

  • Answer the basics:

who, what, when, where. Most importantly, KEEP IT CONCISE AND DIRECTLY TO THE POINT.

   * How will you work with children? 

Are the children in school from June-August? no

		Are they on break? yes
		Address how you will deal with children and learning with their schedule.

?

   * Who is the local partner? Mohamed

How will you follow-up? Partner with groups capable of maintaining the deployment after you leave. Is there an academic institution, NGO, community organization, etc. willing to oversee the project after August? yes

		Do you have family ties in the community? 

yes

		What's going to happen when you leave?

our locat partner will take over or ministry of capacity building will take over of´r Ethiopia Information and communication Technology Agency

         			o Include a letter of support from the local partner (this doesn't count towards your 750 word limit). 

Make sure you show that together you're capable of handling the receipt of a 230 kg package of laptops and equipment we are on the way to have a good contact with Ethiopia Air lines to get permisssion Where will you store the equipment during the deployment. At our locat partner store

   * How will this impact 6-12 yr old children?
	

All proposals must be about kids 6-12 years old and their learning. A proposal gets stronger as soon as the group can show that children are the agents of change, not just the objects of teaching.

         o Stick to OLPC's Core Principles:

child ownership, low ages, saturation, connection, and free and open source.

   * Describe your project's financial needs.
As an attachment (that doesn't count towards the 750 word limit),

provide a brief budget for the project. Include travel costs (to Kigali and your deployment community), housing for 9 weeks (can your local partner help here? yes our local partner cover the accommedation expenses), and other project-related expenses.

Remember that OLPC will only grant up to $10,000 and that you do not need to include XOs, accessories, or Kigali accomodations in your budget. Ethiopia Information and communication agency is
If you have a creative project-based idea that needs funding, let us know.
         o Be realistic with your budget. It will determine how much money you'll receive.
         o But also be economical where possible. If we think a team's budget is wasteful or unrealistic, we will consider that in evaluating the proposal. 
   * How will you provide financial support after you leave? OLPC is dedicating significant time and resources to create learning environments throughout Africa! How can you show that your team can provide financial support after you leave? through ICT
         o Research your university's grant programs, student associations, alumni networks, and other avenues of funding to sustain your deployment. 
   * Communication - do you share the language of the school or community where you will be working? yes
If not, how will this be overcome? The languge of the community is our  native languge os there is no problem with this regards


Note: Upon acceptance, you will be asked to provide proof as a student. This will be verified by the dean of your department, for instance.


About us

The team consists of two members.The first one is Dagmawi, who is currently working on his master’s thesis project in Product and Production development. He posses a Bachelor of Science in Industrial Engineering and two Master's Degree the first one in Industrial engineering and the second in mechanical Engineering-Product & production development which is in progress. he has also awarded certificates on Quality management system development & implementation based on ISO 9001:2000, Integrated performance management, computer maintenace and Networking and Total quality management. Furthermore, his four years of past practical experience while he was in his home country(Ethiopia) at Ministry of Agricultural and Rural development as well as in ministry of Defence in the development of Information and communication technology in developing country will help him to implement the vision of one laptop per child project. Working towards our OLPCorps proposal, Dagmawi is the coordinator of the team and he is responsible for activities related of project leader.


The second member of the team is Demerew k. Tesfaye, is currently doing his master’s thesis on distributed real-time network management. Furthermore he has a double masters degree, the first one is in computer science and the second one is in Network services and systems-which is in progress. He has also taken Short term IT trainings and certifications on CCNA1, CCNA2, CCNA3, CCNA4 and CCNP1, Oracle10g Database Administration, UNIX operating system, As/400 iseries Concepts and Facilities. He has five(5) years of experience on different position at Ethiopia Electric Power Corporation and other institutions as programmer and Database Administrator with a strong knowledge of software development with C++, RPG/400 and Java programming languages.