View source for Constructionism

{{Translations}}
'''Constructionism''' is a philosophy of education in which children learn by doing and making.  They explore and discover instead of being force fed information. More on this topic can be found by exploring Google using keywords such as "constructionism", "education", "philosophy". See for instance [http://mia.openworldlearning.org/constructivism.htm openworldlearning], [[Seymour Papert]]'s website, http://www.papert.org , and 
the wikipedia article on [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constructionist_learning constructionist learning].

== History and Examples==
<div style="float:right; border:1px solid #aaa; margin:1px; padding:2px;">
'''Books and notes'''
* [http://www.amazon.com/Mindstorms-Children-Computers-Powerful-Ideas/dp/0465046746/ref=sr_1_1/103-5721222-1936604?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1183242190&sr=1-1 ''Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas'']  
* ...
</div>

[[Alan Kay]] and his [[Squeak]] project have done a lot to make tools available to teachers who want to develop constructionist educational materials. Alan recently gave a [http://www.artima.com/weblogs/viewpost.jsp?thread=167318 keynote at EuroPython] demonstrating how kids can learn constructively.

One of the great pioneers of the practice, long before the term, was University of Pittsburgh's sociologist Omar Khayyam Moore, who built his "[http://www.winwenger.com/archives/part26.htm Edison Talking Typewriter]" to teach two-year olds to read and write simply by reinforcing aspects of their spontaneous behavior.

Prof. Howard Peelle of the Education School at the University of Massachusetts has written about his experiments with APL in elementary school. The idea is to let children play a game, then learn to make simple adjustments to game play, and progress to full programming. IBM once sponsored a program to support APL for a whole elementary school.

There does not appear to be a single Best Computer Language for elementary school students, but most people agree that Basic doesn't come to close. (Among software developers, the proverb is "Basic isn't.") [[APL]], [[LISP]], [[LOGO]], [[Squeak|Smalltalk]], and several others have been proposed and tried.  It would be useful to bring the resulting knowledge together.  It is clearly impossible to settle the question based only on the stated preferences of adults who don't know all of the languages concerned, that is through [http://mindprod.com/jgloss/rwar.html rwars].

== See also ==
* [[Learning Learning]] parables.
* NB: Constructivism is not 'Edutainment'; see 
[http://llk.media.mit.edu/papers/edutainment.pdf Edutainment? No Thanks. I Prefer Playful Learning]


[[Category:General Public]]
[[Category:Pedagogical ideas]]