Talk:Charityware/CSL: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
== Source code == |
== Source code == |
||
Source code that cannot be freely distributed under the terms of the License but is distributed with the Work or independently should carry a license header with the words "limited distribution" and state the exact terms for distribution or with the words "no redistribution" to deny all further distribution. --[[User:Fasten|Fasten]] 13:27, 7 February 2008 (EST) |
Source code that cannot be freely distributed under the terms of the License but is distributed with the Work or independently should carry a license header with the words "limited distribution" and state the exact terms for distribution or with the words "not for/no redistribution" to deny all further distribution. --[[User:Fasten|Fasten]] 13:27, 7 February 2008 (EST) |
||
Revision as of 18:30, 7 February 2008
Derivative Works
Derivative Works that combined several CSL-licensed Works should require the combined price of all independed Works combined in the Derivative Work. --Fasten 07:03, 30 January 2008 (EST)
The Maintainer should be able to deny the sale of a Derivative Work by Licensors if the product doesn't meet quality standards or other standards. Rationale: The Maintainer retains a degree of control over the Work that can help to promote responsibility. --Fasten 13:27, 7 February 2008 (EST)
Community Innovation Awards Program
Should there be a clause for a Community Innovation Awards Program like Sun's Community Innovation Awards Program? --Fasten 07:03, 30 January 2008 (EST)
Source code
Source code that cannot be freely distributed under the terms of the License but is distributed with the Work or independently should carry a license header with the words "limited distribution" and state the exact terms for distribution or with the words "not for/no redistribution" to deny all further distribution. --Fasten 13:27, 7 February 2008 (EST)