Intellectual Property: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(dronace) |
m (Reverted edits by 66.109.16.30 (Talk); changed back to last version by Sj) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
alcaoralsi |
|||
The current global Intellectual Property regime is designed to serve the interests of IP owners in developed countries, especially publishers and manufacturers. The Copyleft concept of the Free/Open Source Software movement repurposes that regime to protect the public interest, and the |
The current global Intellectual Property regime is designed to serve the interests of IP owners in developed countries, especially publishers and manufacturers. The Copyleft concept of the Free/Open Source Software movement repurposes that regime to protect the public interest, and the |
||
'Copycenter' concept of movements to create and share materials without restrictions support moving beyond that regime to something better suited to a culture of sharing and collaboration. |
'Copycenter' concept of movements to create and share materials without restrictions support moving beyond that regime to something better suited to a culture of sharing and collaboration. |
||
Revision as of 11:04, 14 February 2008
The current global Intellectual Property regime is designed to serve the interests of IP owners in developed countries, especially publishers and manufacturers. The Copyleft concept of the Free/Open Source Software movement repurposes that regime to protect the public interest, and the 'Copycenter' concept of movements to create and share materials without restrictions support moving beyond that regime to something better suited to a culture of sharing and collaboration.
Given the sound and video capabilities of the OLPC laptop, we can teach communities how to preserve and share their cultural heritages.