Talk:XS AdminUI: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
(Weigh in in favor of web-based GUI) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
-- I don't see the point in using pygtk for the UI. This will require the administrator to use a machine with the pygtk dependencies preloaded. I would much rather see a purely web-based admin GUI. This would significantly easy remote administration. [[User:Berrybw|Berrybw]] 23:21, 7 April 2008 (EDT) |
|||
I'm glad to see you there! |
|||
-- Thank you for your remark about my application =o) I will review my proposal. [[User:Grad|GrAd]] 14:52, 9 April 2008 (EDT) |
|||
What services OLDP want to configure throw the XS AdminUI? |
|||
-- I'd like to second [[User:Berrybw|Berrybw]]'s notion that a pygtk front end would have some drawbacks when compared to a purely web-based administrative GUI. That would be usable both locally and remotely. [[User:Rbulling|Rbulling]] 16:33, 30 June 2008 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 16:33, 30 June 2008
-- I don't see the point in using pygtk for the UI. This will require the administrator to use a machine with the pygtk dependencies preloaded. I would much rather see a purely web-based admin GUI. This would significantly easy remote administration. Berrybw 23:21, 7 April 2008 (EDT)
-- Thank you for your remark about my application =o) I will review my proposal. GrAd 14:52, 9 April 2008 (EDT)
-- I'd like to second Berrybw's notion that a pygtk front end would have some drawbacks when compared to a purely web-based administrative GUI. That would be usable both locally and remotely. Rbulling 16:33, 30 June 2008 (UTC)