Open curriculum development: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
(dev) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The world could use a good '''open curriculum''', from basic color and shape identification through literacy and numeracy to geography, math and science, world literature, world culture, art and music. Even controversial topics such as politics and history. Each country could use a good variation on this theme suited to their own cultures and tastes. |
The world could use a good '''open curriculum''', from basic color and shape identification through literacy and numeracy to geography, math and science, world literature, world culture, art and music. Even controversial topics such as politics and history. Each country could use a good variation on this theme suited to their own cultures and tastes. |
||
First |
First and foremost, we could use good basic '''literacy''' and '''numeracy''' materials, in each language, that pass national curriculum standards in as many countries as possible. <!-- In coordination with international literacy campaigns such as [[LitCam]], and our country partners, we hope to coordinate these efforts to provide freely reusable teaching materials to every teacher in our program. --> |
||
Latest revision as of 22:32, 20 October 2006
The world could use a good open curriculum, from basic color and shape identification through literacy and numeracy to geography, math and science, world literature, world culture, art and music. Even controversial topics such as politics and history. Each country could use a good variation on this theme suited to their own cultures and tastes.
First and foremost, we could use good basic literacy and numeracy materials, in each language, that pass national curriculum standards in as many countries as possible.