Talk:Software ECO process: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
m (Talk:Unscheduled software release process moved to Talk:Software ECO process: better name) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:These criteria are open to discussion by the community. They are meant to be guidelines by which we make decisions about the severity of a bug and hence whether or not it merits an unscheduled update. Please feel free to add your POV on this discussion page!! --[[User:Walter|Walter]] 17:23, 3 January 2008 (EST) |
:These criteria are open to discussion by the community. They are meant to be guidelines by which we make decisions about the severity of a bug and hence whether or not it merits an unscheduled update. Please feel free to add your POV on this discussion page!! --[[User:Walter|Walter]] 17:23, 3 January 2008 (EST) |
||
'''Dramatis Personae''' |
|||
:A Latin scholar: I like it!! --[[User:Walter|Walter]] 17:27, 3 January 2008 (EST) |
|||
Latest revision as of 23:47, 30 June 2008
Who maintains these criteria? --Michael Stone 17:17, 3 January 2008 (EST)
- These criteria are open to discussion by the community. They are meant to be guidelines by which we make decisions about the severity of a bug and hence whether or not it merits an unscheduled update. Please feel free to add your POV on this discussion page!! --Walter 17:23, 3 January 2008 (EST)
Dramatis Personae
- A Latin scholar: I like it!! --Walter 17:27, 3 January 2008 (EST)