Systematic testing: Difference between revisions

From OLPC
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: {{developers}} {{draft}} == Purpose == The purpose of this systematic testing effort is to achieve test coverage sufficient to make good ship/no-ship decisions about...)
 
mNo edit summary
Line 16: Line 16:
# Modify our call for volunteer test labor to request help writing and executing our test cases.
# Modify our call for volunteer test labor to request help writing and executing our test cases.
# Draft [[Profiles|other people]] as needed in order to reach our desired confidence in our information.
# Draft [[Profiles|other people]] as needed in order to reach our desired confidence in our information.
# When feasible, contribute patches to the [[Tinderbox]]!


== Bibliography ==
== Bibliography ==

Revision as of 05:16, 22 August 2008


Pencil.png NOTE: The contents of this page are not set in stone, and are subject to change!

This page is a draft in active flux ...
Please leave suggestions on the talk page.

Pencil.png

Purpose

The purpose of this systematic testing effort is to achieve test coverage sufficient to make good ship/no-ship decisions about and to write accurate and timely release notes for the 8.2.0 release.

Battle Plan

  1. Convert one of our lists of features into a priority-tree of of "we-must", "we-hope", and "we-wish" test cases.
  2. Write the "must"-priority test cases and finalize the exact procedures for recording test results.
    • When documented, the procedures for recording test results should be cited above.
  3. Modify our call for volunteer test labor to request help writing and executing our test cases.
  4. Draft other people as needed in order to reach our desired confidence in our information.
  5. When feasible, contribute patches to the Tinderbox!

Bibliography

Never having performed a large-scale systematic software test myself, I went looking for reference works and found:

  • ISO/IEC 12207.0,
  • IEEE STD 829-1998,
  • MIL-STD-498, and
  • ISO/IEC TR 19759:2005(E) (which has a nice bibliography)