Charityware/CSL: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: This is a proposal for a Charity Software License. == Intent of the License == The intent of the license is to offer an alternative to open source software as specified by the OSI open s...) |
m (Redirecting to CSL) |
||
| (65 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
#REDIRECT [[CSL]] |
|||
This is a proposal for a Charity Software License. |
|||
== Intent of the License == |
|||
The intent of the license is to offer an alternative to open source software as specified by the OSI open source definition. |
|||
Software licensed under the CSL can be made available in source code but there is no obligation to do so. |
|||
The software is made available with guarantees about the use of revenue generated by software sales. |
|||
The license will include a list of trusted third parties, usually non-profit organizations, who can sell software |
|||
licensed under the CSL. A group of authors cannot sell their own software under the CSL without first |
|||
becoming a trusted reseller in the sense of the license. The rationale is that the CSL is intended as a |
|||
unique selling point for software licensed under the CSL and arbitrary software authors are not |
|||
expected to reliably handle the financial resources in the intent of the license. Thus the CSL can |
|||
increase the trustworthiness of authors without any disadvantages for software authors who mean |
|||
to take the CSL seriously. Trusted resellers in the sense of the license require external auditors, |
|||
as, for instance, the Deutsche Zentralinstitut für soziale Fragen (dzi.de) |
|||
Latest revision as of 12:28, 25 December 2008
Redirect to: