Talk:It's a New Day: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
ScottSwanson (talk | contribs) (→Kudos: new section) |
Annegentle (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Nicely done, Yama. This is really artfully written! -- [[User:ScottSwanson|ScottSwanson]] 16:59, 8 January 2009 (UTC) (on behalf of the [[IMSA]] chapter) |
Nicely done, Yama. This is really artfully written! -- [[User:ScottSwanson|ScottSwanson]] 16:59, 8 January 2009 (UTC) (on behalf of the [[IMSA]] chapter) |
||
I fully endorse your demand for what you call call "community involvement." I did my dissertation on the acquisition of computer technologies. One of the major results was that end users have to be intimately involved for the acquisition to be a success. This really is an obvious conclusion if one considers the whole system.--[[User:Drneals|Drneals]] 18:15, 9 January 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Wonderfully stated, Yama. I am just so proud to know you through this project. :) [[User:Annegentle|annegentle]] 20:39, 9 January 2009 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 20:39, 9 January 2009
It is great to check the wiki and find updates like this...
Kudos
Nicely done, Yama. This is really artfully written! -- ScottSwanson 16:59, 8 January 2009 (UTC) (on behalf of the IMSA chapter)
I fully endorse your demand for what you call call "community involvement." I did my dissertation on the acquisition of computer technologies. One of the major results was that end users have to be intimately involved for the acquisition to be a success. This really is an obvious conclusion if one considers the whole system.--Drneals 18:15, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
Wonderfully stated, Yama. I am just so proud to know you through this project. :) annegentle 20:39, 9 January 2009 (UTC)