BSEA:Decisions: Difference between revisions

From OLPC
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
See also [[http://www.doe.mass.edu/bsea/decisions.html fully searchable record of rulings back to 2000]]
Add decisions and rulings here.
= Rulings =
* [http://www.doe.mass.edu/bsea/rulings/09-5976.doc Motion of the Springfield Public Schools to Join the Department of Mental Retardation, the Department of Public Health and the Massachusetts Commission for the Blind in this appeal. 6-03-2009]
* [http://www.doe.mass.edu/bsea/rulings/09-3499.doc RULING ON HUDSON PUBLIC SCHOOLS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 2-02-2009]
* [http://www.doe.mass.edu/bsea/rulings/09-5506.doc Scituate RULING ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY DECISION 4-28-2009]
* [http://www.doe.mass.edu/bsea/rulings/09-4771.doc Natick RULING ON MOTION TO DISMISS 4-07-2009]


The following links and summaries make it easier to find relevant legal and educational references on special education.

The school systems almost always win these cases because they only go to hearing if they are sure they will win. If they have any doubt, they settle in advance. Nonetheless, each case gives a detailed description of the experience of one child and family. Those descriptions are very valuable for learning about services and practices in special education.

= Decisions =
* [http://www.doe.mass.edu/bsea/decisions/10-4756.doc Framingham v Natick and DESE Assignment Decision 5-28-2010]
* [http://www.doe.mass.edu/bsea/decisions/10-4756.doc Framingham v Natick and DESE Assignment Decision 5-28-2010]

* [http://www.doe.mass.edu/bsea/decisions/09-7928_10-0262.doc Anonymous Reading Decision]
* [http://www.doe.mass.edu/bsea/decisions/09-7928_10-0262.doc Anonymous Reading Decision]
* [http://www.doe.mass.edu/bsea/decisions/09-0139.doc Lexington 5-21-2010]
* [http://www.doe.mass.edu/bsea/decisions/09-0139.doc Lexington 5-21-2010]
Line 25: Line 26:
= Rulings =
= Rulings =
These are a little more legalistic and less education focused. Some contain statements of fact and they show the tricks of the trade used by lawyers on both sides to advance their case.
These are a little more legalistic and less education focused. Some contain statements of fact and they show the tricks of the trade used by lawyers on both sides to advance their case.

* [http://www.doe.mass.edu/bsea/rulings/10-3387.doc Worcester CORRECTED RULING ON MOTION TO JOIN 3-9-2010]
* [http://www.doe.mass.edu/bsea/rulings/10-3387.doc Worcester CORRECTED RULING ON MOTION TO JOIN 3-9-2010]
* [http://www.doe.mass.edu/bsea/rulings/10-1237.doc Shrewsbury RULING ON REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION OF LEGAL STANDARD 2-18-2010]
* [http://www.doe.mass.edu/bsea/rulings/10-1237.doc Shrewsbury RULING ON REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION OF LEGAL STANDARD 2-18-2010]
Line 36: Line 36:
* [http://www.doe.mass.edu/bsea/rulings/09-7936.doc Brockton Recusal Motion 7-08-2009]
* [http://www.doe.mass.edu/bsea/rulings/09-7936.doc Brockton Recusal Motion 7-08-2009]
* [http://www.doe.mass.edu/bsea/rulings/09-6962.doc Fall River RULING RE JOINDER OF MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH 6-24-2009]
* [http://www.doe.mass.edu/bsea/rulings/09-6962.doc Fall River RULING RE JOINDER OF MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH 6-24-2009]
* [http://www.doe.mass.edu/bsea/rulings/09-5976.doc Motion of the Springfield Public Schools to Join the Department of Mental Retardation, the Department of Public Health and the Massachusetts Commission for the Blind in this appeal. 6-03-2009]

* [http://www.doe.mass.edu/bsea/rulings/09-3499.doc RULING ON HUDSON PUBLIC SCHOOLS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 2-02-2009]
* [http://www.doe.mass.edu/bsea/rulings/09-5506.doc Scituate RULING ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY DECISION 4-28-2009]
* [http://www.doe.mass.edu/bsea/rulings/09-4771.doc Natick RULING ON MOTION TO DISMISS 4-07-2009]


{{BSEA}}
{{BSEA}}

Revision as of 19:07, 7 July 2010

See also [fully searchable record of rulings back to 2000]

The following links and summaries make it easier to find relevant legal and educational references on special education.

The school systems almost always win these cases because they only go to hearing if they are sure they will win. If they have any doubt, they settle in advance. Nonetheless, each case gives a detailed description of the experience of one child and family. Those descriptions are very valuable for learning about services and practices in special education.

Decisions

Rulings

These are a little more legalistic and less education focused. Some contain statements of fact and they show the tricks of the trade used by lawyers on both sides to advance their case.


This project and information is not affiliated with the Mass DESE. It is an independent effort by private citizens intended to help the people of Massachusetts learn more about the Special Education in our state.

Much of this information is extracted from BSEA Searchable List of Rulings

Additional comments and information from public sources has also been included. The contents and links may have been edited as well. No representation is made as to the accuracy or validity of this information. This page is only intended to help people more easily keep in touch with the work of the Bureau of Special Education Appeals

Please add your comments on the discussion page and add to or update any other pages. Make sure to preface the names of any new pages with "BSEA:"