Feature roadmap/Faster imaging: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Automated import of articles) |
No edit summary |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
# On next reboot of the XO its running the new image. Subsequent boots do not do this multicast listening unless configured specifically by the user. |
# On next reboot of the XO its running the new image. Subsequent boots do not do this multicast listening unless configured specifically by the user. |
||
|Specification= |
|Specification= |
||
See also: [[Multicast NAND FLASH Update]]<br> |
See also: [[Nandblaster|Multicast NAND FLASH Update]]<br> |
||
Some open issues to be addressed by the design proposal: |
Some open issues to be addressed by the design proposal: |
||
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
* Any other security points? |
* Any other security points? |
||
|Owners= |
|Owners=Gregorio, Reuben, wmb@firmworks.com |
||
|Priority=2 |
|||
|Helps deployability=yes |
|||
|Target for 9.1=yes |
|||
}} |
}} |
Latest revision as of 06:32, 4 August 2010
Feature subcategory | Is part of::Category:Security, activation and deployability | |
Requesters | {{#arraymap:Ethiopia, Rwanda, Haiti|,|x|Requested by::x}} | |
Requirements | This feature request is needed to minimize the time to install a custom image over a wireless or wired network. It will be used when an XO comes from the factory with an older release. The deployment then needs to upgrade to the latest release and possibly install some customizations (e.g. content, language pack, activities, see also separate customization requirement below). The solution must be faster than imaging via USB sticks for imaging more than 1,000 XOs. Must allow install of new image via wireless or wired network. Possibly sub-variants of in school case for Mesh, Wireless AP, XS.
Workflow example for the network case above:
| |
Specification | See also: Multicast NAND FLASH Update Some open issues to be addressed by the design proposal:
limit it to set # of XOs at a time? Can we scale it by using more "channels" or more APs?
| |
Owners | {{#arraymap:Gregorio, Reuben, wmb@firmworks.com|,|x|Contact person::User:x}} | |
Priority | Priority::2 | |
Helps deployability? | Helps deployability::yes | |
Target for 9.1? | Target for 9.1::yes |