Talk:Accessibility Computing Numerical Pointer: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
::: Alright, I suppose I should have phrased this differently. I don't understand at all what this spec does. It has no high-level description of how it works, or how it will be used. It wasn't clear to me how it had anything to do with the other aspects of the software on the laptops. To my untrained eye, it seems vastly complicated, far beyond the ability of any 8 year-old child to comprehend, let alone use. --[[User:Jacobolus|Jacobolus]] 13:03, 14 February 2007 (EST) |
::: Alright, I suppose I should have phrased this differently. I don't understand at all what this spec does. It has no high-level description of how it works, or how it will be used. It wasn't clear to me how it had anything to do with the other aspects of the software on the laptops. To my untrained eye, it seems vastly complicated, far beyond the ability of any 8 year-old child to comprehend, let alone use. --[[User:Jacobolus|Jacobolus]] 13:03, 14 February 2007 (EST) |
||
(unindenting) To clafify further, this specification seems to be a massively complicated finite state machine. Computers are good at dealing with such structures. Humans are not (having taken several years of difficult university-level mathematics and computer science, I cannot imagine myself keeping such a structure in my head). For this system to be used by a student, a printout of all the states would be required. Given that these laptops are going to many places without printers, and will be used far away from the classroom, this is impractical to an extreme. |
|||
Instead, useful operations in every activity should have relevant keyboard shortcuts as an alternate invocation method. I can possibly even understand a mechanism for using the arrow keys to move the mouse. But using the row of numbers as a state machine to accomplish every possible touchpad and keyboard event in several arbitrary presses, seems just absurd to me. --[[User:Jacobolus|Jacobolus]] 13:19, 14 February 2007 (EST) |
Revision as of 18:19, 14 February 2007
okay, moving discussion from article page
{{delete}}
This page seems completely useless to me. Someone should figure out what it is. --jacobolus
- The original author of this page disagrees with the request to delete the page. The idea is defended on the page itself and that defence is repeated below as the rules of deciding upon a deletion request made on the article page requires defence on the discussion page rather than on the article page where the deletion request has been made! The idea is certainly open to critical review and indeed the decision may be taken not to take up the idea. Yet no specific technical reason for wanting the page deleted has been put forward at this time. Critical review is needed as to whether the idea could be useful to the OLPC project before any decision to delete the page is made.
- Well, suppose that a child has arthritis and cannot move the pointer properly yet can press on the number keys. This method would allow that child to move the mouse pointer around on the screen.
- The method allows any user to position the mouse pointer with pixel precision.
- This method allows any user to enter any Unicode character into the laptop. Suppose that someone in Brazil wishes to enter French accents, how else would he or she do it using the keyboard on his or her machine? What about the accents for Esperanto, or for Latvian?
- This method allows colours to be selected with precision.
- This method is expandable for other features as well.
- Alright, I suppose I should have phrased this differently. I don't understand at all what this spec does. It has no high-level description of how it works, or how it will be used. It wasn't clear to me how it had anything to do with the other aspects of the software on the laptops. To my untrained eye, it seems vastly complicated, far beyond the ability of any 8 year-old child to comprehend, let alone use. --Jacobolus 13:03, 14 February 2007 (EST)
(unindenting) To clafify further, this specification seems to be a massively complicated finite state machine. Computers are good at dealing with such structures. Humans are not (having taken several years of difficult university-level mathematics and computer science, I cannot imagine myself keeping such a structure in my head). For this system to be used by a student, a printout of all the states would be required. Given that these laptops are going to many places without printers, and will be used far away from the classroom, this is impractical to an extreme.
Instead, useful operations in every activity should have relevant keyboard shortcuts as an alternate invocation method. I can possibly even understand a mechanism for using the arrow keys to move the mouse. But using the row of numbers as a state machine to accomplish every possible touchpad and keyboard event in several arbitrary presses, seems just absurd to me. --Jacobolus 13:19, 14 February 2007 (EST)