Talk:OLPC FAQ: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
== Where/how should interested parties ask questions about OLPC? == |
== Where/how should interested parties ask questions about OLPC? == |
||
I think it would be useful to put that question in the FAQ (aka "What if my question isn't listed here in the FAQ?") |
I think it would be useful to put that question in the FAQ (aka "What if my question isn't listed here in the FAQ?") |
||
A very nice idea. --[[User:Walter|Walter]] |
|||
In addition to the FAQ, I wonder if an "AQ"--Asked Questions, i.e. not necessarily frequent--area might be useful, since many people might come with a specific question or two, but might not easily find what they want by browsing the wiki. |
In addition to the FAQ, I wonder if an "AQ"--Asked Questions, i.e. not necessarily frequent--area might be useful, since many people might come with a specific question or two, but might not easily find what they want by browsing the wiki. |
||
Perhaps we can use this Talk page for these sorts of things. --[[User:Walter|Walter]] |
|||
Here are some questions of mine (Qwertie): |
Here are some questions of mine (Qwertie): |
||
Line 22: | Line 26: | ||
I feel like restricting the laptop and its components to one purpose is unnecessary--then again, I haven't studied the problem. Maybe someone can explain why it's necessary, but I wonder if it's just a lack of managerial resources. |
I feel like restricting the laptop and its components to one purpose is unnecessary--then again, I haven't studied the problem. Maybe someone can explain why it's necessary, but I wonder if it's just a lack of managerial resources. |
||
The bottom line is that our mission is learning, not laptops. While we will be working with a commercial partner at some point for both machines and interesting parts--we've been looking at models where by the commercial side can help drive down the cost for the kids--our immediate priority is the non-commercial machine. --[[User:Walter|Walter]] |
Revision as of 22:35, 25 April 2006
'Others have already started a website that sells our laptop for $300, so the balance of money can be used to support the poorest children.'
Where is this website? It might be good to have a link so interested parties can sign up. -206.58.200.30 19:35, 12 February 2006 (EST)
Which countries are confirmed?
Why not have the product available to poverty level children in the USA? We have an art project for low income kids that could use this. http://www.riversidenet.info/
I remember reading something about Costa Rica, is this Central Anmerican country at the project? --Dagoflores 02:57, 19 March 2006 (EST) Answer: ___
Where/how should interested parties ask questions about OLPC?
I think it would be useful to put that question in the FAQ (aka "What if my question isn't listed here in the FAQ?")
A very nice idea. --Walter
In addition to the FAQ, I wonder if an "AQ"--Asked Questions, i.e. not necessarily frequent--area might be useful, since many people might come with a specific question or two, but might not easily find what they want by browsing the wiki.
Perhaps we can use this Talk page for these sorts of things. --Walter
Here are some questions of mine (Qwertie):
- I've heard that individuals won't be allowed to buy OLPC laptops, or that it won't be available to the public. If so, why not? Wouldn't it be good for the project? You can sell them without having to provide a general-purpose OS preinstalled, after all.
- OLPC relies on economy of scale to reach low prices. To improve scale, why not sell important parts separately from the laptop? For example, the screen technology could be sold for use in home theatre remotes and in-car computers at higher prices to subsidize OLPC somewhat. Assuming there is some central OLPC organization with employees, I would suggest creating a few non-laptop departments focused on other mass-market uses of the technology--then again, attempting to find companies that would be interesting in buying a million or two units might be a better strategy.
I feel like restricting the laptop and its components to one purpose is unnecessary--then again, I haven't studied the problem. Maybe someone can explain why it's necessary, but I wonder if it's just a lack of managerial resources.
The bottom line is that our mission is learning, not laptops. While we will be working with a commercial partner at some point for both machines and interesting parts--we've been looking at models where by the commercial side can help drive down the cost for the kids--our immediate priority is the non-commercial machine. --Walter