Talk:Instant messaging challenges: Difference between revisions

From OLPC
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 11: Line 11:
connect up a centralized server. When they connect and get a userid, it would then send data back to the client of a signed digital certificate. Aka, when I sign up I would get a signed digital certificate saying that I am <b>profdeadmeat</b> signed by the server that we all know. Probably this should use the Jabber protocol. When we are using a regular non supported network of peer2peers then what would happen is that machines would query machines around them for instant messanging. <br />
connect up a centralized server. When they connect and get a userid, it would then send data back to the client of a signed digital certificate. Aka, when I sign up I would get a signed digital certificate saying that I am <b>profdeadmeat</b> signed by the server that we all know. Probably this should use the Jabber protocol. When we are using a regular non supported network of peer2peers then what would happen is that machines would query machines around them for instant messanging. <br />
&nbsp;&nbsp; It looks like the [http://www.zeroconf.org/ Zero Conf Group] and the [http://www.multicastdns.org/ mDNS/DNS-SD] groups may have figured parts of this out. A product that does some of what you are talking about is [http://www.apple.com/ca/macosx/features/bonjour/ Bonjour] [http://www.apple.com/ca/macosx/features/ichat/ ichat] which is Apple's name for ZeroConf does do peer2peer chatting.
&nbsp;&nbsp; It looks like the [http://www.zeroconf.org/ Zero Conf Group] and the [http://www.multicastdns.org/ mDNS/DNS-SD] groups may have figured parts of this out. A product that does some of what you are talking about is [http://www.apple.com/ca/macosx/features/bonjour/ Bonjour] [http://www.apple.com/ca/macosx/features/ichat/ ichat] which is Apple's name for ZeroConf does do peer2peer chatting.

I was going to suggest Apple's Bonjour be listed along with AOL's Oscar and Yahoo's YMSG protocols, but I admit that I don't know that much about how these things work and whether it would be appropriate.


Note: some of the above has moved to the main page if you need to speak to me contact me online
Note: some of the above has moved to the main page if you need to speak to me contact me online
via AOL or email me via gmail to my account.
via AOL or email me via gmail to my account.

Revision as of 02:53, 26 April 2006

March 27-06: SoreThumb: "I may admit to be a bit ignorant of the situation even after reading the article, but sometimes outside and somewhat-ignorant thoughts offer new insights: Why not have the mesh network part integrated into an IM system specifically for the OLPCs?
"So to speak, each computer would have a unique serial #, and each computer would store the custom username.. If you can turn it on and log in, you technically would have the rights to using the IM name linked to the Serial.
"Also, it may be CPU or network-heavy, but when each computer signs onto the network, it obviously has to poll the local area for available OLPCs, right? Why not have this as signing-onto the IM system: all OLPCs recieving the network connection would send out notification of presence like a ripple from a pond.
"In any case, this network could technically not be that secure. If I'm not mistaken, you'd be sending your IM across other computers until it reaches its destination, with possible party-interest. Perhaps a global chatroom?
"I hope I adequately discussed the possibilities of a possible system." - NBST 2006

I think Sonork [1] would be excelent for the system. It has not only offline messaging, but offline File Transfer!

I think that what is needed is something that will work well over a peer to peer system. Probably what you want to have happen is that a person wants to orignally use a system they would have to connect up a centralized server. When they connect and get a userid, it would then send data back to the client of a signed digital certificate. Aka, when I sign up I would get a signed digital certificate saying that I am profdeadmeat signed by the server that we all know. Probably this should use the Jabber protocol. When we are using a regular non supported network of peer2peers then what would happen is that machines would query machines around them for instant messanging.
   It looks like the Zero Conf Group and the mDNS/DNS-SD groups may have figured parts of this out. A product that does some of what you are talking about is Bonjour ichat which is Apple's name for ZeroConf does do peer2peer chatting.

I was going to suggest Apple's Bonjour be listed along with AOL's Oscar and Yahoo's YMSG protocols, but I admit that I don't know that much about how these things work and whether it would be appropriate.


 Note: some of the above has moved to the main page if you need to speak to me contact me online
  via AOL or email me via gmail to my account.