Educators guide: Difference between revisions

From OLPC
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Attempting drafts at facilitation planning)
 
(13 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:


You can loosely structure lessons, allowing student questions to drive the learning process without sidetracking it. These plans could follow a general outline of:
You can loosely structure lessons, allowing student questions to drive the learning process without sidetracking it. These plans could follow a general outline of:

--Setting the foundation and discovering what the student already knows
* Setting the foundation and discovering students' prior knowledge
--Exploring, determining how questions for exploration are chosen, how to manage investigations and group students
* Exploring, determining how questions for exploration are chosen, how to manage investigations and group students
--Connecting concepts, figuring out how to help students make sense of investigations, communicate their findings, and critically reflect on their investigation and the process
* Connecting concepts, figuring out how to help students reflect on their investigations, promote dialog between students to communicate their findings, and critically reflect on their investigation and the process
--Collaborating and sharing, determining how to help students share their new knowledge to take action on what they've learned
* Collaborating and sharing, determining how to help students share their new knowledge to act on their new mental models


==Workflow for daily use of the XO ==
==Workflow for daily use of the XO ==
Refer to the [[Simplified User Guide]] for many of the daily maintenance and exploration tasks you can do with the XO laptop.
Refer to the [[Manuals|OLPC Manual]] for many of the daily maintenance and exploration tasks you can do with the XO laptop.


== Basics of constructivist learning theory ==
== Basics of constructivist learning theory ==
When a student can construct their own rules about and based on their observations, they learn. Learning becomes the basic act of adjusting mental models based on experiences.
Rather than using teaching as a term because of the connotation of lecture-based or non-inquiry-based learning that can be associated with the term "teaching," a learning intervention can be used to described guiding a student to understanding.


So, how does a teacher adjust his or her own mental model to become a facilitator of learning? Think "guide on the side" rather than "sage on the stage".
Think of an intervention as a task where activities in context provide learners with an opportunity to discover and collaboratively construct meaning as the intervention unfolds.

Think about a light touch, but just as a scientist constructs theories, students learn by adjusting their theories with the results of their tests against those theories. Instead of a lesson, think of an intervention - a task where activities in context provide learners with an opportunity to discover and collaboratively construct meaning as the intervention unfolds. Teachers are leaders, guides, and questioners. Students are testers, questioners, and knowledge seekers.


With this mind shift, learners are each treated as unique individuals, and instructors act as facilitators rather than as teachers. Parents, siblings, classmates, other aged kids, any of these people can be facilitators.
With this mind shift, learners are each treated as unique individuals, and instructors act as facilitators rather than as teachers. Parents, siblings, classmates, other aged kids, any of these people can be facilitators.


''Additional reading''
''Additional reading''
From the Wikipedia article at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constructivism_(learning_theory)
* Wikipedia article at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constructivism_(learning_theory)
* {{cite journal|
author=Bruner, J. S.|
year=1961|
title= The act of discovery|
journal= Harvard Educational Review|
volume=31|
issue=1|
pages=21–32}}
*Bransford, J., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). [[How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School (expanded edition)]], Washington: [[National Academies Press]].
* {{cite journal|
author=Cooper, G., & Sweller, J.|
year=1987|
title= Effects of schema acquisition and rule automation on mathematical problem-solving transfer|
journal= Journal of Educational Psychology|
volume=79|
issue=4|
pages=347-362}}
* {{cite journal|
author=Chandler, P., & Sweller, J.|
year=1992|
title= The split-attention effect as a factor in the design of instruction|
journal= British Journal of Educational Psychology|
volume=62|
issue=|
pages=233-246}}
*Dalgarno, B. (1996) Constructivist computer assisted learning: theory and technique, ''ASCILITE Conference'', 2-4 December 1996, retrieved from [http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/adelaide96/papers/21.html http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/adelaide96/papers/21.html]
*Dalgarno, B. (1996) Constructivist computer assisted learning: theory and technique, ''ASCILITE Conference'', 2-4 December 1996, retrieved from [http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/adelaide96/papers/21.html http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/adelaide96/papers/21.html]
* Jean Piaget (1967). ''Logique et Connaissance scientifique'', Encyclopédie de la Pléiade. [http://books.google.com/books?id=VyVNeFFy2E4C The Psychology of Intelligence]
*DeVries et al. (2002) ''Developing constructivist early childhood curriculum: practical principles and activities''. Teachers College Press: New York. ISBN 0-8077-4121-3, ISBN 0-8077-4120-5.
*Jeffery, G. (ed) (2005) ''The creative college: building a successful learning culture in the arts'', Stoke-on-Trent: Trentham Books.
* {{cite journal|
author=Kalyuga,S., Ayres,P. Chandler,P and Sweller,J.|
year=2003|
title= The Expertise Reversal Effect|
journal= Educational Psychologist|
volume=38|
issue=1|
pages=23–31}}
* {{cite journal|
author=Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., and Clark, R. E.|
year=2006|
title= Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: an analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching|
journal= Educational Psychologist|
volume=41|
issue=2|
pages=75-86}}
* {{cite journal|
author=Moreno, R., & Mayer, R.|
year=1999|
title= Cognitive principles of multimedia learning: The role of modality and contiguity|
journal= Journal of Educational Psychology|
volume=91|
issue=|
pages=358-368}}
* {{cite journal|
author=Mousavi, S., Low, R., & Sweller, J.|
year=1995|
title= Reducing cognitive load by mixing auditory and visual presentation modes|
journal= Journal of Educational Psychology|
volume=87|
issue=2|
pages=319-334}}
*Piaget, Jean. (1950). ''The Psychology of Intelligence''. New York: Routledge.
* [[Jean Piaget]] ([[1967]]). ''Logique et Connaissance scientifique'', Encyclopédie de la Pléiade.
* {{cite journal|
author=Mayer, R.|
year=2004|
title= Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? The case for guided methods of instruction|
journal= American Psychologist|
volume=59|
issue=1|
pages=14-19}}
* {{cite journal|
author=Paas, F.|
year=1992|
title= Training strategies for attaining transfer of problem-solving skill in statistics: A cognitive-load approach|
journal= Journal of Educational Psychology|
volume=84|
issue=|
pages=429–434}}
*Scerri, E.R. (2003). Philosophical Confusion in Chemical Education, ''Journal of Chemical Education'', 80, 468-474. (This article is a critique of the use of constructivism in chemical education.)
*Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). ''Mind and society: The development of higher mental processes''. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
*Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). ''Mind and society: The development of higher mental processes''. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
*Wood, D. (1998) ''How Children Think and Learn.'' 2nd edition. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd. ISBN 0-631-20007-X.
*Wertsch, J.V (1997) "Vygotsky and the formation of the mind" Cambridge.
*Wertsch, J.V (1997) "Vygotsky and the formation of the mind" Cambridge.
*Harel, Idit and Seymour Papert, [http://books.google.com/books?id=FTlpAQAACAAJ Constructionism]


== Understanding why the XO is important to education ==
== Understanding why the XO is important to education ==
* [http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Learning_Vision OLPC's Vision for Education]

* [http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Educational_activity_ideas Educational Activity Ideas]
== Creating or planning lessons that use the XO ==
* [http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_Publications#Education OLPC is seeking contributions to these education publications]


== Scenarios about extra practice on XO basics, based on age of child ==
== Scenarios about extra practice on XO basics, based on age of child ==
(Look at LeapFrog's sample content)
(Look at LeapFrog's sample content)


== Talking to other XO teachers ==
[http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Classroom_2.0_XO_Educator_Group Classroom 2.0 XO Educator Group]

[http://classroom20.ning.com/group/xo Classroom 2.0 group of educators interested in the XO]


== Getting help with the XO ==
== Getting help with the XO ==
[http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Support Support]


== Getting help with the school server ==
== Getting help with the school server ==
[http://wiki.laptop.org/go/School_server School server information]

== Talking to other XO teachers ==
Classroom 2.0

Latest revision as of 23:44, 3 November 2011

Really, a facilitator's guide, ideally, this page serves as a guide for parents, teachers and other students who are interested in leading students with the XO as a constructivist learning tool.

Workflow for facilitation planning

Lesson plans in a constructivist or inquiry-based scenario are really plans for facilitation of learning, with the teacher role being one of facilitator rather than the source of all knowledge.

You can loosely structure lessons, allowing student questions to drive the learning process without sidetracking it. These plans could follow a general outline of:

  • Setting the foundation and discovering students' prior knowledge
  • Exploring, determining how questions for exploration are chosen, how to manage investigations and group students
  • Connecting concepts, figuring out how to help students reflect on their investigations, promote dialog between students to communicate their findings, and critically reflect on their investigation and the process
  • Collaborating and sharing, determining how to help students share their new knowledge to act on their new mental models

Workflow for daily use of the XO

Refer to the OLPC Manual for many of the daily maintenance and exploration tasks you can do with the XO laptop.

Basics of constructivist learning theory

When a student can construct their own rules about and based on their observations, they learn. Learning becomes the basic act of adjusting mental models based on experiences.

So, how does a teacher adjust his or her own mental model to become a facilitator of learning? Think "guide on the side" rather than "sage on the stage".

Think about a light touch, but just as a scientist constructs theories, students learn by adjusting their theories with the results of their tests against those theories. Instead of a lesson, think of an intervention - a task where activities in context provide learners with an opportunity to discover and collaboratively construct meaning as the intervention unfolds. Teachers are leaders, guides, and questioners. Students are testers, questioners, and knowledge seekers.

With this mind shift, learners are each treated as unique individuals, and instructors act as facilitators rather than as teachers. Parents, siblings, classmates, other aged kids, any of these people can be facilitators.

Additional reading

Understanding why the XO is important to education

Scenarios about extra practice on XO basics, based on age of child

(Look at LeapFrog's sample content)


Talking to other XO teachers

Classroom 2.0 XO Educator Group

Classroom 2.0 group of educators interested in the XO

Getting help with the XO

Support

Getting help with the school server

School server information