Talk:SEO for the OLPC wiki: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Masai mara safari: new section) |
m (Reverted edits by 184.22.53.247 (Talk) to last revision by Patrol) |
||
| (7 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Another thought is that I'd expect Google to figure out that's an issue for most sites and adjust the ranking automatically (which is a good argument for not worrying about it). --[[User:Chriswaterguy|Chriswaterguy]] 14:02, 17 September 2008 (UTC) |
Another thought is that I'd expect Google to figure out that's an issue for most sites and adjust the ranking automatically (which is a good argument for not worrying about it). --[[User:Chriswaterguy|Chriswaterguy]] 14:02, 17 September 2008 (UTC) |
||
== Link Building Uk == |
|||
Why is link building uk necessary for a website? |
|||
== Search engine optimization uk == |
|||
Why do we tend to need search engine optimization uk services for our websites? |
|||
== The Great migration == |
|||
During which season you may witness The Great migration of Masai Mara? |
|||
== Great migration == |
|||
Which are the animals taking part in great migration? |
|||
== Masai mara safari == |
|||
Why to take up Tanzania safari throughout the vacations? |
|||
Latest revision as of 15:52, 6 March 2012
NoFollow on most links to "About OLPC"
Matt Cutts from Google seems to endorse the following comment:
- Eric Enge: What we've been doing is working with clients and telling them to take pages like their about us page, and their contact us page, and link to them from the home page normally, without a NoFollow attribute, and then link to them using NoFollow from every other page. It's just a way of lowering the amount of link juice they get. These types of pages are usually the highest PageRank pages on the site, and they are not doing anything for you in terms of search traffic. - Eric Enge Interviews Google's Matt Cutts, October 8, 2007
Is this possible in MediaWiki, or would it need a tweak/extension?
Another thought is that I'd expect Google to figure out that's an issue for most sites and adjust the ranking automatically (which is a good argument for not worrying about it). --Chriswaterguy 14:02, 17 September 2008 (UTC)