Talk:How to Damage a FLASH Storage Device: Difference between revisions

From OLPC
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (→‎Flash storage-specific file systems: Added a link to the UBIFS page.)
Line 6: Line 6:


Striking that the article has no mention of a flash storage-specific file system. I would have thought that a primary recommendation is to use [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UBIFS UBIFS] rather than FAT or ext3. Regards, ... [[User:Peasthope|Peasthope]] 16:10, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
Striking that the article has no mention of a flash storage-specific file system. I would have thought that a primary recommendation is to use [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UBIFS UBIFS] rather than FAT or ext3. Regards, ... [[User:Peasthope|Peasthope]] 16:10, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Refer here. [http://wiki.laptop.org/go/UBIFS_on_XO http://wiki.laptop.org/go/UBIFS_on_XO] ... [[User:Peasthope|Peasthope]] 14:00, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:00, 29 March 2013

FAT and long file names

Does a requirement for VFAT or long file names have a bearing on the choice of FAT16 vs. FAT32? Apparently both FAT can have long file names in Linux. Is there any subtle difficulty which needs mention? Thanks, ... Peasthope 19:00, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

Flash storage-specific file systems

Striking that the article has no mention of a flash storage-specific file system. I would have thought that a primary recommendation is to use UBIFS rather than FAT or ext3. Regards, ... Peasthope 16:10, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Refer here. http://wiki.laptop.org/go/UBIFS_on_XO ... Peasthope 14:00, 29 March 2013 (UTC)