Talk:Semipostal stamp for email: Difference between revisions

From OLPC
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (wording)
m (wording)
Line 1: Line 1:
Amusingly (pretended) lack of collective intelligence and foresight leads to a beneficial effect here: Acting collectively intelligent people would easily avoid paying postage but under the pretense of not being able to avoid paying postage senders might choose to get back at the recipients by also demanding postage. Collectively intelligent people would choose to pretent to lack collective intelligence and foresight in order to gain the beneficial effects: One beneficial effect here, which could be seen as a moral obligation, is that people who were actually not particularly interested in donating money for charitable purposes might sneakily be corrupted to do because they would suddenly have a budget for it that had no other conceivable use. People might flip through a catalog like goodgifts.org simply because there's a budget to be spend and they like shopping. --[[User:Fasten|Fasten]] 05:09, 31 May 2007 (EDT)
Amusingly (pretended) lack of collective intelligence and foresight leads to a beneficial effect here: Acting collectively intelligent people would easily avoid paying postage but under the pretense of not being able to avoid paying postage senders might choose to get back at the recipients by also demanding postage. Collectively intelligent people would choose to pretent to lack collective intelligence and foresight in order to gain the beneficial effects: One beneficial effect here, which could be seen as a moral obligation, is that people who were actually not particularly interested in donating money for charitable purposes might sneakily be corrupted to do because they would suddenly have a budget for it that had no other conceivable use. People might flip through a catalog like goodgifts.org simply because there's a budget to be spend and they like shopping or due to force of habit. --[[User:Fasten|Fasten]] 05:09, 31 May 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 10:41, 31 May 2007

Amusingly (pretended) lack of collective intelligence and foresight leads to a beneficial effect here: Acting collectively intelligent people would easily avoid paying postage but under the pretense of not being able to avoid paying postage senders might choose to get back at the recipients by also demanding postage. Collectively intelligent people would choose to pretent to lack collective intelligence and foresight in order to gain the beneficial effects: One beneficial effect here, which could be seen as a moral obligation, is that people who were actually not particularly interested in donating money for charitable purposes might sneakily be corrupted to do because they would suddenly have a budget for it that had no other conceivable use. People might flip through a catalog like goodgifts.org simply because there's a budget to be spend and they like shopping or due to force of habit. --Fasten 05:09, 31 May 2007 (EDT)