Talk:Squeak: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
(Quirk: Squeak 3.8 has no clean Unicode support) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:: That would not be a problem at all. I often use Squeak on machines far more limited than the OLPC (like a 200MHz Pentium MMX with 32MB of RAM).--[[User:Jecel|Jecel]] 18:48, 29 May 2006 (EDT) |
:: That would not be a problem at all. I often use Squeak on machines far more limited than the OLPC (like a 200MHz Pentium MMX with 32MB of RAM).--[[User:Jecel|Jecel]] 18:48, 29 May 2006 (EDT) |
||
== Quirk: Squeak 3.8 has no clean Unicode support == |
|||
/me guesses Unicode is mandatory (Santiago Gala) - [http://minnow.cc.gatech.edu/squeak/857 Unicode status in Squeak]. |
|||
Squeak does reasonably good Unicode support. The educational environment is translated different languages, including Western- and Eastern- European languages, Korean, Japanese, etc. While UTF-8 has nothing special about "Localization and Universal Access", Squeak's internal encoding is Unicode-based (more like UTF-32). (Yoshiki Ohshima) |
|||
''Who:'' |
|||
Revision as of 21:26, 3 June 2006
Cons
- Bulky?
- Will it be able to run in the available hardware?
- That would not be a problem at all. I often use Squeak on machines far more limited than the OLPC (like a 200MHz Pentium MMX with 32MB of RAM).--Jecel 18:48, 29 May 2006 (EDT)
Quirk: Squeak 3.8 has no clean Unicode support
/me guesses Unicode is mandatory (Santiago Gala) - Unicode status in Squeak.
Squeak does reasonably good Unicode support. The educational environment is translated different languages, including Western- and Eastern- European languages, Korean, Japanese, etc. While UTF-8 has nothing special about "Localization and Universal Access", Squeak's internal encoding is Unicode-based (more like UTF-32). (Yoshiki Ohshima)
Who: