MediaWiki talk:Searchresulttext: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Describe why a google link is about to be added to searchresulttext.) |
No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
It would have been better to: |
It would have been better to: |
||
*Use a text box, preloaded with the search words. But I failed to figure out how to get mediawiki to show the raw html of a box. |
*Use a text box, preloaded with the search words. But I failed to figure out how to get mediawiki to show the raw html of a box. |
||
Perhaps the [[MediaWiki:Googlesearch]] message might be used? |
|||
*Modify Search in the wiki sidebar instead. But organizationally this has proven difficult to motivate. |
*Modify Search in the wiki sidebar instead. But organizationally this has proven difficult to motivate. |
||
*Have a working search engine. But organizationally this has so far proven impossible to accomplish. |
*Have a working search engine. But organizationally this has so far proven impossible to accomplish. |
||
[[User:MitchellNCharity|MitchellNCharity]] 14:33, 2 August 2007 (EDT) |
|||
:It is a matter of finding resources to do the mediawiki tuning... I suppose that is an organizational problem. --[[User:Walter|Walter]] 12:22, 3 August 2007 (EDT) |
|||
Latest revision as of 16:22, 3 August 2007
I've added a link to the google search page. See http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/2162 .
It would have been better to:
- Use a text box, preloaded with the search words. But I failed to figure out how to get mediawiki to show the raw html of a box.
Perhaps the MediaWiki:Googlesearch message might be used?
- Modify Search in the wiki sidebar instead. But organizationally this has proven difficult to motivate.
- Have a working search engine. But organizationally this has so far proven impossible to accomplish.
MitchellNCharity 14:33, 2 August 2007 (EDT)
- It is a matter of finding resources to do the mediawiki tuning... I suppose that is an organizational problem. --Walter 12:22, 3 August 2007 (EDT)