User talk:Wmb@firmworks.com: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Hi! In lesson 4, I might have only used the definition of factorial that used the word 'recurse', and just skipped 'recursive'. 'recurse' is ever so much nicer, don't you think? |
Hi! In lesson 4, I might have only used the definition of factorial that used the word 'recurse', and just skipped 'recursive'. 'recurse' is ever so much nicer, don't you think? |
||
<Mitch> I don't have a opinion about recurse vs. recursive. Both get the job done. |
<Mitch> I don't have a strong opinion about recurse vs. recursive. Both get the job done. |
||
Thanks for the awesome intro to forth! |
Thanks for the awesome intro to forth! |
||
Revision as of 21:19, 5 August 2007
recurse, yum
Hi! In lesson 4, I might have only used the definition of factorial that used the word 'recurse', and just skipped 'recursive'. 'recurse' is ever so much nicer, don't you think?
<Mitch> I don't have a strong opinion about recurse vs. recursive. Both get the job done.
Thanks for the awesome intro to forth!
<Mitch> You're welcome, glad you like it.