Talk:Radio and broadcast: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The DBs mentioned are virtually static, it would make sense to preserve atypical wireless communications for regular updates.[[User:DyD|DyD]] |
|||
The examples are nearly static data. This is best distributed via truck, ship, horseback, camel, etc. Sending many gigabytes of data over a REALLY SLOW radio link just doesn't make sense. (shortwave, so-called "high frequency", is very low frequency by modern standards) |
|||
It would be possible to *easily* build in an AM radio using the 484 chip... |
|||
It is also easy, but impractical to build in a respectable AM transmitter, due to the simplicity of the circuit and high power requirements(1+W)... |
|||
[[User:DyD|DyD]] 13 September 2007 |
|||
Revision as of 22:55, 13 September 2007
The DBs mentioned are virtually static, it would make sense to preserve atypical wireless communications for regular updates.DyD
It would be possible to *easily* build in an AM radio using the 484 chip... It is also easy, but impractical to build in a respectable AM transmitter, due to the simplicity of the circuit and high power requirements(1+W)... DyD 13 September 2007