Talk:Radio and broadcast: Difference between revisions

From OLPC
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
The DBs mentioned are virtually static, it would make sense to preserve atypical wireless communications for regular updates.[[User:DyD|DyD]]
The DBs mentioned are virtually static, it would make sense to preserve atypical wireless communications for regular updates. ---[[User:DyD|DyD]]


It would be possible to *easily* build in an AM radio using the 484 chip...
It would be possible to *easily* build in an AM radio using the 484 chip...
It is also easy, but impractical to build in a respectable AM transmitter, due to the simplicity of the circuit and high power requirements(1+W)...
It is also easy, but impractical to build in a respectable AM transmitter, due to the simplicity of the circuit and high power requirements(1+W)...
[[User:DyD|DyD]] 13 September 2007
---[[User:DyD|DyD]] 13 September 2007

Latest revision as of 22:56, 13 September 2007

The DBs mentioned are virtually static, it would make sense to preserve atypical wireless communications for regular updates. ---DyD

It would be possible to *easily* build in an AM radio using the 484 chip... It is also easy, but impractical to build in a respectable AM transmitter, due to the simplicity of the circuit and high power requirements(1+W)... ---DyD 13 September 2007