User talk:Gabrielinux: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(must not have seen the CVS check-ins or the #defines) |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Tux Paint== |
==Tux Paint== |
||
I actually am a Tux Paint developer, and have checked in a few OLPC-related things already. The going has been slow because Sugar is way more non-standard than it needs to be. At times it looks like there is a Python conspiracy, intentionally avoiding interfaces that are reasonable for C programmers. (undocumented, non-standard, involving needlessly complicated protocols that are implemented only in Python libraries) Thanks to [[Low-level_Activity_API|some heroic efforts]] by [[User:Bert|Bert]], things are getting better. [[User:AlbertCahalan|AlbertCahalan]] 02:06, 15 November 2007 (EST) |
I actually am a [[Tux Paint]] developer, and have checked in a few OLPC-related things already. The going has been slow because Sugar is way more non-standard than it needs to be. At times it looks like there is a Python conspiracy, intentionally avoiding interfaces that are reasonable for C programmers. (undocumented, non-standard, involving needlessly complicated protocols that are implemented only in Python libraries) Thanks to [[Low-level_Activity_API|some heroic efforts]] by [[User:Bert|Bert]], things are getting better. [[User:AlbertCahalan|AlbertCahalan]] 02:06, 15 November 2007 (EST) |
||
Latest revision as of 07:14, 15 November 2007
Tux Paint
I actually am a Tux Paint developer, and have checked in a few OLPC-related things already. The going has been slow because Sugar is way more non-standard than it needs to be. At times it looks like there is a Python conspiracy, intentionally avoiding interfaces that are reasonable for C programmers. (undocumented, non-standard, involving needlessly complicated protocols that are implemented only in Python libraries) Thanks to some heroic efforts by Bert, things are getting better. AlbertCahalan 02:06, 15 November 2007 (EST)