Talk:Keyboard layouts: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Main page character encoding) |
(Topic moved from article) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
The main page doesn't specify character encoding, and it's not unicode/utf 8 (firefox 2.0.0.1 shows a lot of ?'s on the keyboards.) --[[User:Keybounce|Keybounce]] 11:40, 12 February 2007 (EST) |
The main page doesn't specify character encoding, and it's not unicode/utf 8 (firefox 2.0.0.1 shows a lot of ?'s on the keyboards.) --[[User:Keybounce|Keybounce]] 11:40, 12 February 2007 (EST) |
||
==Colemak Keyboard== |
|||
Dvorak has too many issues to be a mainstream alternative to QWERTY. These problems are explained on the [http://colemak.com/FAQ#What.27s_wrong_with_the_Dvorak_layout.3F Colemak FAQ]. --[[User:Jj05|Jj05]] 13:17, 19 December 2006 (EST) |
|||
:I moved this from the article to here. It has nothing to do with the topic of the page, which is existing layouts in Linux. When there is a Colemak keyboard in a mainstream Linux distribution (preferably Red Hat or Debian), we can put its layout here.--[[User:Mokurai|Mokurai]] 09:27, 23 November 2007 (EST) |
|||
Revision as of 14:27, 23 November 2007
Main page character encoding
The main page doesn't specify character encoding, and it's not unicode/utf 8 (firefox 2.0.0.1 shows a lot of ?'s on the keyboards.) --Keybounce 11:40, 12 February 2007 (EST)
Colemak Keyboard
Dvorak has too many issues to be a mainstream alternative to QWERTY. These problems are explained on the Colemak FAQ. --Jj05 13:17, 19 December 2006 (EST)
- I moved this from the article to here. It has nothing to do with the topic of the page, which is existing layouts in Linux. When there is a Colemak keyboard in a mainstream Linux distribution (preferably Red Hat or Debian), we can put its layout here.--Mokurai 09:27, 23 November 2007 (EST)