Talk:Keyboard layouts: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Topic moved from article) |
(Page is utf-8) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
The main page doesn't specify character encoding, and it's not unicode/utf 8 (firefox 2.0.0.1 shows a lot of ?'s on the keyboards.) --[[User:Keybounce|Keybounce]] 11:40, 12 February 2007 (EST) |
The main page doesn't specify character encoding, and it's not unicode/utf 8 (firefox 2.0.0.1 shows a lot of ?'s on the keyboards.) --[[User:Keybounce|Keybounce]] 11:40, 12 February 2007 (EST) |
||
:I see <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" /> in the page source. Please check your fonts and font settings.--[[User:Mokurai|Mokurai]] 09:28, 23 November 2007 (EST) |
|||
==Colemak Keyboard== |
==Colemak Keyboard== |
||
Revision as of 14:28, 23 November 2007
Main page character encoding
The main page doesn't specify character encoding, and it's not unicode/utf 8 (firefox 2.0.0.1 shows a lot of ?'s on the keyboards.) --Keybounce 11:40, 12 February 2007 (EST)
- I see <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" /> in the page source. Please check your fonts and font settings.--Mokurai 09:28, 23 November 2007 (EST)
Colemak Keyboard
Dvorak has too many issues to be a mainstream alternative to QWERTY. These problems are explained on the Colemak FAQ. --Jj05 13:17, 19 December 2006 (EST)
- I moved this from the article to here. It has nothing to do with the topic of the page, which is existing layouts in Linux. When there is a Colemak keyboard in a mainstream Linux distribution (preferably Red Hat or Debian), we can put its layout here.--Mokurai 09:27, 23 November 2007 (EST)