Talk:Contents manifest specification: Difference between revisions

From OLPC
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Paper tiger?)
 
m (Talk:Manifest Specification moved to Talk:Contents Manifest Specification: Standardizing on calling these 'contents' files.)
(No difference)

Revision as of 18:29, 6 December 2007

What use is this?

OK, the Activity_bundles spec says it's required, but it's a complicated gibberish format, without any tools to generate it. Is this just a useless paper spec? Do applications *actually* have to include a manifest, sign it, etc? Until there are real tools for anybody to easily make one, my app isn't gonna have one...

Let's go back to RPM, or preferably Deb. This not-invented-here packaging system is just painful.