Talk:Sugar design review 3: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Have you considered publishing some scope documents on the Wiki, i.e. hardware goals, basic software set goals, Sugar goals, etc.? |
Have you considered publishing some scope documents on the Wiki, i.e. hardware goals, basic software set goals, Sugar goals, etc.? |
||
--[[User:Memracom|Memracom]] 15:33, 8 July 2006 (EDT) |
--[[User:Memracom|Memracom]] 15:33, 8 July 2006 (EDT) |
||
Has there been any thought on single click vs. double click? |
|||
: [[User:Fragmede|Fragmede]] 11:58, 21 July 2006 (EDT) |
|||
Revision as of 15:58, 21 July 2006
This is starting to sound like you are moving in the direction of the Squeak Etoys interface. At a recent Python conference in Europe, Alan Kay said that he expected that it was likely for OLPC to reimplement some of the ideas of Squeak in the Python language rather than simply adopt Squeak.
I wonder if this is what you are conciously doing.
Have you considered publishing some scope documents on the Wiki, i.e. hardware goals, basic software set goals, Sugar goals, etc.? --Memracom 15:33, 8 July 2006 (EDT)
Has there been any thought on single click vs. double click?
- Fragmede 11:58, 21 July 2006 (EDT)