Email address use: Difference between revisions

From OLPC
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
(Please don't spread this bad meme of address munging into the OLPC wiki.)
 
Line 5: Line 5:
The OLPC Wiki 5,000+ pages are publically available, so '''please do not post somebody's email address on the wiki''' unless you're certain they don't mind. This includes using <nowiki><mailto:></nowiki> links, which are just as visible as plain text addresses to address-collecting programs.
The OLPC Wiki 5,000+ pages are publically available, so '''please do not post somebody's email address on the wiki''' unless you're certain they don't mind. This includes using <nowiki><mailto:></nowiki> links, which are just as visible as plain text addresses to address-collecting programs.


Want to help clean the site up? Then pitch in. If you see an email address in the wiki, you can safely change it to the form of "foo AT bar DOT com" and post a note to the author of the article asking if they really want to advertise personal information in a public site. Please remember that there are a few public email addresses that are OK to leave intact (? are there really any that want to collect spam?).
Want to help clean the site up? Then use some judgement. If you see an email address in the wiki, don't just randomly change it to a form like "foo AT bar DOT com" or "foo@NOSPAMbar.com"; all those silly forms are as obvious to spammers as they are to you. Also, please remember that there are many deliberately published email addresses that should not be changed (such as gnu@toad.com, help@laptop.org, devel@laptop.org, etc).




A little more detail, for those who are interested:
A little more detail, for those who are interested:


* Using "obscure" formats like "joe AT example DOT com" is a common practice, but is not total protection. However, it is preferable to using spelled-out email addresses or <nowiki><mailto:></nowiki> links. See even more detail at [http://wiki.freegeek.org/index.php/Berkely_spam_harvest_study_excerpt Berkely spam harvest study excerpt]. There's also an excellent wikipedia article at [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Address_munging Address munging].
* Using "obscure" formats like "joe AT example DOT com" is a common practice, but is useless. It is preferable to use an ordinary plain text email address or <nowiki><mailto:></nowiki> links. See more detail at the old 2003 [http://wiki.freegeek.org/index.php/Berkely_spam_harvest_study_excerpt Berkely spam harvest study excerpt]. There's also an excellent wikipedia article at [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Address_munging Address munging], which cautions, "Many see it (address munging) as an attempt to fix a symptom rather than solving the real problem of e-mail spam, at the expense of causing problems for innocent users."


* MediaWiki, the software that powers wiki.laptop.org, appears to have been designed to discourage web-crawling robots (like Googlebot) from indexing non-current pages. It does this through the use of <meta> tags. The use of this technique is described at [[http://local.google.com/webmasters/remove.html#exclude_pages Google's site]]. While it offers no guarantee, in practice this is effective protection, because it prevents spammers from using major search engines to find email addresses in the non-current pages of our wiki.
* MediaWiki, the software that powers wiki.laptop.org, appears to have been designed to discourage web-crawling robots (like Googlebot) from indexing non-current pages. It does this through the use of <meta> tags. The use of this technique is described at [[http://local.google.com/webmasters/remove.html#exclude_pages broken link to Google]]. In practice this is ineffective protection.


* MediaWiki also allows anyone to "Email this user" assuming both people are registered and both have confirmed email addresses.
* MediaWiki also allows anyone to "Email this user" assuming both people are registered and both have confirmed email addresses.

Latest revision as of 01:25, 13 February 2008

The email address, in recent years, has become a highly prized piece of currency among spammers (AKA mass-emailers, junk mailers, jerkyheads.)

Because of this, spammers have come up with countless devious ways to gather email addresses from public web pages.

The OLPC Wiki 5,000+ pages are publically available, so please do not post somebody's email address on the wiki unless you're certain they don't mind. This includes using <mailto:> links, which are just as visible as plain text addresses to address-collecting programs.

Want to help clean the site up? Then use some judgement. If you see an email address in the wiki, don't just randomly change it to a form like "foo AT bar DOT com" or "foo@NOSPAMbar.com"; all those silly forms are as obvious to spammers as they are to you. Also, please remember that there are many deliberately published email addresses that should not be changed (such as gnu@toad.com, help@laptop.org, devel@laptop.org, etc).


A little more detail, for those who are interested:

  • Using "obscure" formats like "joe AT example DOT com" is a common practice, but is useless. It is preferable to use an ordinary plain text email address or <mailto:> links. See more detail at the old 2003 Berkely spam harvest study excerpt. There's also an excellent wikipedia article at Address munging, which cautions, "Many see it (address munging) as an attempt to fix a symptom rather than solving the real problem of e-mail spam, at the expense of causing problems for innocent users."
  • MediaWiki, the software that powers wiki.laptop.org, appears to have been designed to discourage web-crawling robots (like Googlebot) from indexing non-current pages. It does this through the use of <meta> tags. The use of this technique is described at [broken link to Google]. In practice this is ineffective protection.
  • MediaWiki also allows anyone to "Email this user" assuming both people are registered and both have confirmed email addresses.

Source