Talk:XO Austin: Difference between revisions

From OLPC
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
m (Talk:Xo-austin moved to Talk:XO Austin: name convention for groups)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 9: Line 9:
If you are interested, i would be willing to take over hosting this server. It would keep the same name or could be aus.tx.il.us.xochat.org. let me know your thoughts.
If you are interested, i would be willing to take over hosting this server. It would keep the same name or could be aus.tx.il.us.xochat.org. let me know your thoughts.
--[[User:HarperReed|HarperReed]] 23:40, 6 April 2008 (EDT)
--[[User:HarperReed|HarperReed]] 23:40, 6 April 2008 (EDT)

Its fine right now, as long as I remember to keep an eye on the Daemon, I don't mind it hanging off my server. Maybe it would be best to just start a midwest regional server and see how that works out. Too bad the XO neighborhood concept doesn't allow for multi-server and/or hierarchical structure. -[[User:Ericvh|Ericvh]] 16:31, 8 April 2008 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 00:13, 4 June 2008

Sign me up! -- PatrickTou 16:22, 3 January 2008 (EST)

Jabber server is now running, folks please try it out. I'll try and leave a qemu XO logged in to test against -- Ericvh 21:54, 9 January 2008 (EST)

I added this server to the Community Jabber Servers list. --HarperReed 03:36, 2 March 2008 (EST)

Regional server

If you are interested, i would be willing to take over hosting this server. It would keep the same name or could be aus.tx.il.us.xochat.org. let me know your thoughts. --HarperReed 23:40, 6 April 2008 (EDT)

Its fine right now, as long as I remember to keep an eye on the Daemon, I don't mind it hanging off my server. Maybe it would be best to just start a midwest regional server and see how that works out. Too bad the XO neighborhood concept doesn't allow for multi-server and/or hierarchical structure. -Ericvh 16:31, 8 April 2008 (EDT)