Projects/NAND Drag: Difference between revisions
< Projects
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (New page: The NAND flash on the XO might be dragging our performance down. Possible culprits: * Garbage Collection Pressure steals CPU and I/O cycles. * Compression steals CPU cycles on file cop...) |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
* Long jffs2 mount time drives small children stir-crazy. |
* Long jffs2 mount time drives small children stir-crazy. |
||
* Complex file packing makes it too hard for Open Firmware to write to jffs2? |
* Complex file packing makes it too hard for Open Firmware to write to jffs2? |
||
Things to work on: |
|||
* Find a good experimental system for modeling XO-like performance without needing compression to fit onto the flash. |
Latest revision as of 01:50, 11 September 2008
The NAND flash on the XO might be dragging our performance down. Possible culprits:
- Garbage Collection Pressure steals CPU and I/O cycles.
- Compression steals CPU cycles on file copy?
- Long jffs2 mount time drives small children stir-crazy.
- Complex file packing makes it too hard for Open Firmware to write to jffs2?
Things to work on:
- Find a good experimental system for modeling XO-like performance without needing compression to fit onto the flash.