Ejabberd resource tests/try 6: Difference between revisions
(trying with new ejabberd ssl code) |
(→Try 6: Shared roster with new TLS code: add multihype link and explanation) |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Try 6: Shared roster with new TLS code == |
== Try 6: Shared roster with new TLS code == |
||
This is much the same test as [[Ejabberd resource tests/try |
This is much the same test as [[Ejabberd resource tests/try 5]], but without manual interactivity testing and a slightly longer gap between jumps in the number of clients. It was conducted by running |
||
./multihype 15 1000 50 30 |
|||
using [[http://dev.laptop.org/git?p=users/dbagnall/ejabberd-tests.git;a=blob;f=hype/multihype.sh this test script]]. That means that 50 clients would connect to the server every 1000 seconds, and continue to use it every 30 seconds until there were (15 * 50) 750 connected. |
|||
=== Memory use === |
=== Memory use === |
Latest revision as of 10:08, 21 November 2008
This is much the same test as Ejabberd resource tests/try 5, but without manual interactivity testing and a slightly longer gap between jumps in the number of clients. It was conducted by running
./multihype 15 1000 50 30
using [this test script]. That means that 50 clients would connect to the server every 1000 seconds, and continue to use it every 30 seconds until there were (15 * 50) 750 connected.
Memory use
Here you can see the memory use is slightly over 1 MB per user, and growth is approximately linear or slightly in excess thereof. The server has 1GB of ram.
Memory use vs connections
This shows max-median-min values at stable numbers of clients (min. 3 minutes).
These are the numbers being graphed:
resident_mem clients minimum median maximum 50 50 54 55 100 96 99 101 150 129 132 154 200 160 163 201 250 205 218 306 300 275 299 369 350 369 394 468 400 436 449 575 450 542 552 639 500 555 561 688 550 707 709 778 600 710 748 872 650 696 712 873 700 868 888 950 747 800 912 944
Virtual memory
The virtual memory size shows a smooth increase:
CPU usage
Cumulative CPU use by the ejabberd process:
Load averages, by connections and by time: