XO-4/Kernel/Testing: Difference between revisions

From OLPC
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
 
(23 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Final testing push default configuration:
Final testing push default configuration for 13.2.0:
* fs-update 32009o4.zd with this [http://dev.laptop.org/~kernels/public_rpms/f18-xo4/kernel-3.5.7_xo4-20130614.1404.olpc.62d1459.armv7hl.rpm kernel], or
* fs-update os26
* fs-update 32010o4.zd
* change-tag TS DEVL \ enable aggressive mode with repeated runs
* change-tag TS DEVL \ enable aggressive mode with repeated runs


Debugging configuration A (with wireless):
Debugging configuration:
* log the output of the serial console,
* log the output of the serial console,
* olpc-dev-kernel
* olpc-dev-kernel
* no_console_suspend
* no_console_suspend

Debugging configuration B (without wireless):
* log the output of the serial console,
* olpc-dev-kernel
* no_console_suspend
* touch /runin/no-wireless
* echo blacklist mwifiex_sdio >> /etc/modprobe.d/olpc.conf


See also:
See also:
Line 19: Line 13:
*[http://dev.laptop.org/~kernels/public_rpms/f18-xo4/?C=M;O=D latest kernel RPMs]
*[http://dev.laptop.org/~kernels/public_rpms/f18-xo4/?C=M;O=D latest kernel RPMs]


Testing is being tracked below by kernel git hash.
Testing might be tracked below by kernel git hash.


Kernel developers, put your new kernel in a new section here. Latest at top. Testers place links to reports indented under the kernel. Test reports should include Open Firmware and EC versions.
Kernel developers, put your new kernel in a new section here. Latest at top. Testers place links to reports indented under the kernel. Test reports should include Open Firmware and EC versions.
Line 35: Line 29:
and add after this html comment
and add after this html comment
-->
-->
== 929a97d ==
* build 24 (with kernel rpm), Q7B11jd, EC 0.3.09, runin 0.21.1, blacklisted btmrvl_sdio and mwifiex_sdio, extreme, watchdog, in progress by James:
** SKU296, 3734 cycles,
** SKU295, 3664 cycles,
** SKU292 with 8787, 3409 cycles,
** SKU293 with 8686, 3423 cycles.
* build 24 (with kernel rpm), Q7B11jd, EC 0.3.09, runin 0.21.1, blacklisted btmrvl_sdio and mwifiex_sdio, aggressive, watchdog, in progress by James:
** SKU296, 3777 cycles, completed, <trac>12397</trac> (out of memory in audio) observed,
** SKU295, 3861 cycles, completed, <trac>12397</trac> observed,
** SKU292 with 8787, 3581 cycles, completed, <trac>12397</trac> observed,
** SKU293 with 8686, <trac>12285</trac> (out of memory kills memtester), fail at 3219 cycles.

== c87dda3 ==
* build 24 (with kernel rpm), Q7B11jd, EC 0.3.09, runin 0.21.1, blacklisted btmrvl_sdio and mwifiex_sdio, aggressive, watchdog, in progress by James:
** SKU296, 3801 cycles, completed,
** SKU295, 3914 cycles, completed,
** SKU292 with 8787, 3622 cycles, completed,
** SKU293 with 8686, 3718 cycles, completed.

== 9e42d55 ==
* stock kernel in build 26, along with Q7B11, EC 0.3.08, and runin 0.21.0,
* build 24 (with kernel rpm), Q7B11jd, EC 0.3.09, runin 0.21.1, blacklisted btmrvl_sdio and mwifiex_sdio, aggressive, by James:
** SKU296, with watchdog, 3800 cycles, completed,
** SKU295, 3754 cycles, completed,
** SKU295, with watchdog, 1572 cycles, discovered off, no serial log, last kern.log activity was cmd 0x66,
** SKU292 with 8787, 3770 cycles, completed,
** SKU292 with 8787, with watchdog, 1225 cycles, discovered off, no serial log, last kern.log activity was cmd 0x66,
** SKU293 with 8686, with watchdog, 2550 cycles, 1177 cycles (why did it go backwards?).
** SKU293 with 8686, out of memory fail at 2940 cycles, logs-SHC2380007F-130117_025503.tar.gz

* build 24 (with kernel rpm), Q7B11jd, EC 0.3.08, runin 0.21.1, blacklisted btmrvl_sdio and mwifiex_sdio, aggressive, by James:
** SKU296, hung at 2649 cycles, ''olpc-ec-1.75: transmit FIFO not empty'',
** SKU295, 3869 cycles, completed,
** SKU292, 3633 cycles, completed,

* build 24 (with kernel rpm), Q7B11jd, EC 0.3.08, runin 0.21.1, blacklisted btmrvl_sdio, aggressive, by James:
** SKU293 with 8686, hung at 3122 cycles.

* build 26 Q7B11, EC 0.3.09, runin 0.20.0
** SKU 295 with 8787, aggressive suspend but otherwise normal settings, completed 5 consecutive 24-hour runs, #12397 seen, by Samuel.
** SKU 292 with 8686, aggressive suspend but otherwise normal settings, hung after 17 cycles, SDIO/MMC kernel panic on resume, by Samuel.

== 6ebcabf ==

''In Progress''
*stock kernel in build 25, along w. Q7B11 and EC 0.3.08
*build 24 (with kernel rpm), runin 0.21.1, blacklisted btmrvl_sdio only, no-wireless, aggressive, SKU296, 4849 cycles, completed, by James.
*build 25, aggressive timing, a B1 w. 8686 card, 10K S/R, in progress by wad.
*build 25, aggressive timing, a B1 w. 8686 card, 6000 cycles, in progress by wad.
*build 25, no-wireless and blacklisted mwifiex_sdio and btmrvl_sdio drivers, aggressive timing, (2) C1 units w. 8787 cards, all 11K+ cycles, in progress by wad.
*build 25, C2, with 8787 enabled, with no_console_suspend. Started 2013-01-17 00:07:25 UCT. Logging to runin-with-8787-with-n_c_s-0.log
*build 25 plus EC 3.09, no_console_suspend debug and aggressive, SKU 298, 2200 S/R cycles, in progress by wad
*build 25 plus EC 3.09, aggressive timing, a B1 and a 1.2 GHz B0B w. 8686 cards, around 2200 S/R cycles each, in progress by wad.

''Failures''
*build 25, aggressive timing, (7) B1 and C1 units w. 8787 cards, all failed within 100 S/R cycles, by wad.
*build 25, aggressive timing, (2) B1 units w. 8686 cards, hung at 1600 and 160 S/R cycles, by wad.
*build 25, aggressive timing, a B1 and a 1.2 GHz B0B w. 8686 cards, around 8K S/R cycles each, hung in resume, by wad.
*build 25, no wireless and blacklisted mwifiex/btmrvl drivers, aggressive timing, (2) C1 and a B1, 8K S/R cycles, hung (lost power due to EC bug), by wad.
*build 25, no wireless and blacklisted mwifiex/btmrvl drivers, aggressive timing, (1) B1 w. 8787, 8K S/R cycles, hung, by wad.
*build 25, sku 295, drivers blacklisted, hang on wakeup from idle suspend using keyboard --- traced to another EC wakeup issue by pgf
*build 24 (with kernel rpm), abbreviated scan, interlocked scan, aggressive timing, by James, all failed within 100 S/R cycles,
*build 24 (with kernel rpm), blacklisted btmrvl_sdio only, no-wireless, aggressive, SKU295, hang after suspend, after 3018 cycles.
*build 25, C2, with 8787 enabled, without no_console_suspend, hung at the 70th suspend cycle (last message was "Suspending console(s)...". Next try will be with no_console_suspend. Saving log file as runin-with-8787-without-n_c_s.log. by wmb.

''Success''
*Huh ? We never declare success, only "in progress" or "failed"!

== 62abd44 ==
*stock kernel in build 24, along w. Q7B11 and EC 0.3.08
*build 24, abbreviated scan, interlocked scan, aggressive timing, test ended prematurely with iw lockup, 50 suspend cycles on SKU295, 71 suspend cycles on SKU296,

== e673868 ==
*stock kernel in build 23, along w. Q7B11 and EC 0.3.08
*build 23, abbreviated scan, interlocked scan, 4306 suspend cycles, aggressive timing, by James, passed.
*build 23, no-wireless and blacklisted mwifiex_sdio and btmrvl_sdio drivers, 14,800 suspend cycles, aggressive timing, SKU 297, by wad, passed

Latest revision as of 23:48, 14 June 2013

Final testing push default configuration for 13.2.0:

  • fs-update 32009o4.zd with this kernel, or
  • fs-update 32010o4.zd
  • change-tag TS DEVL \ enable aggressive mode with repeated runs

Debugging configuration:

  • log the output of the serial console,
  • olpc-dev-kernel
  • no_console_suspend

See also:

Testing might be tracked below by kernel git hash.

Kernel developers, put your new kernel in a new section here. Latest at top. Testers place links to reports indented under the kernel. Test reports should include Open Firmware and EC versions.


Retrieved from "http://wiki.laptop.org/mediawiki/index.php?title=XO-4/Kernel/Testing&oldid=287510"