Talk:Applications to adopt: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
m (Reverted edits by 81.4.69.200 (Talk); changed back to last version by Walter) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I fear the list will get really long. |
I fear the list will get really long. |
||
:The focus should be on tools of expression and communication. We have a small footprint for the distribution itself, so we need to keep the list contained. However, maybe rather than restricting the list at this stage, we should build it as a table where we can list attributes that allow us to evaluate the appropriateness of proposed applications: e.g., package dependencies—we want to be reusing as much as possible; memory usage; etc. (There is a list of criteria on the [[Development issues]] page.) [[User:Walter|Walter]] 02:28, 8 June 2006 (EDT) |
|||
Latest revision as of 18:19, 13 November 2007
Are there any guidelines as to what applications can make it in this list?
I fear the list will get really long.
- The focus should be on tools of expression and communication. We have a small footprint for the distribution itself, so we need to keep the list contained. However, maybe rather than restricting the list at this stage, we should build it as a table where we can list attributes that allow us to evaluate the appropriateness of proposed applications: e.g., package dependencies—we want to be reusing as much as possible; memory usage; etc. (There is a list of criteria on the Development issues page.) Walter 02:28, 8 June 2006 (EDT)