Ask OLPC a Question/archive/Q1 2006: Difference between revisions

From OLPC
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Redirecting to Ask OLPC a Question/1)
 
(133 intermediate revisions by 47 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
#redirect [[Ask OLPC a Question/1]]
Note before Posting:
*This is the Page that is dedicated to answering any question that you have about the OLPC project. Just edit this page and add the Question in and as soon as possible it will be added to the [[OLPC_FAQ]].
*If you wish to submit ideas, check out the [[OLPC_Idea_Pool]].
*Lots of questions need answering. If you know the answer feel free to reply, sign your responce and then put it in the Answered question. There, the community can discuse and revise, so the question can be integrated with the main FAQ.


=Questions=
==What happens when a kid nukes the software on his/her computer?==
Is there a way to wipe everything and start again? --[[User:Stranger|Stranger]] 00:57, 14 June 2006 (EDT)
==Why not have the product available to poverty level children in the USA?== We have an art project for low income kids that could use this.
http://www.riversidenet.info/

==Can a legitimate NGO or foundation apply for your program?==
In some countries there is a lot of corruption. Would OLPC partner with an NGO instead of the education ministry?

== Which countries are confirmed? ==

I remember reading something about Costa Rica, is this Central Anmerican country at the project? --[[User:Dagoflores|Dagoflores]] 02:57, 19 March 2006 (EST) Answer: ___



==Indivuals and OLPC==
I've heard that individuals won't be allowed to buy OLPC laptops, or that it won't be available to the public. If so, why not? Wouldn't it be good for the project? You can sell them without having to provide a general-purpose OS preinstalled, after all. -Qwertie

==Improving Scale of products sold and commercial partners==
OLPC relies on economy of scale to reach low prices. To improve scale, why not sell important parts separately from the laptop? For example, the screen technology could be sold for use in home theatre remotes and in-car computers at higher prices to subsidize OLPC somewhat. Assuming there is some central OLPC organization with employees, I would suggest creating a few non-laptop departments focused on other mass-market uses of the technology--then again, attempting to find companies that would be interesting in buying a million or two units might be a better strategy.

I feel like restricting the laptop and its components to one purpose is unnecessary--then again, I haven't studied the problem. Maybe someone can explain why it's necessary, but I wonder if it's just a lack of managerial resources.-Qwertie


:The bottom line is that our mission is learning, not laptops. While we will be working with a commercial partner at some point for both machines and interesting parts--we've been looking at models where by the commercial side can help drive down the cost for the kids--our immediate priority is the non-commercial machine. --[[User:Walter|Walter]]

== What is the $100 Laptop, really? ==

I moved these discussions from the article page to this discussion page. [[User:Walter|Walter]] 01:57, 5 May 2006 (EDT)

Hello. Wouldn't it be better to have a small HD instead? As far as I know, Flash memory has a much higher Gb cost than that of a standard HD. I also know that there are ridiculously small HDs with really large storage capacity, at least in comparison to the meager 512Mb you currently propose. Wouldn't a larger capacity storage help to extend the life of such a machine?

:The biggest single point of failure of laptops is the HD. We are opting for robustness over more on-board storage. Synchronization with the "school server" should help mitigate some of the capacity challenges raised. [[User:Walter|Walter]] 02:03, 5 May 2006 (EDT)

:Actually, I have been told that HDs are only the 2nd biggest point of failure; internal connectors breaking is Number 1. We are trying to eliminate most of those as well.[[User:Walter|Walter]] 03:40, 7 June 2006 (EDT)

Somewhere in this wiki (in the discussion of system software), the starting paragraph "seriously questions" Linux for OLPC. But in this FAQ, it starts off by saying it will be Linux-based. To cut short the argument, why not try [[PuppyLinux]] now so that the project can move forward to content, training and localization concerns?

:The Fedora kernel[http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/OLPC] is sufficiently far-enough along that developers can start exploring some of these higher-level issues. Also, we hope that many of these issues will be addressed upstream such that they benefit the entire community, not just those using this particular platform. [[User:Walter|Walter]] 02:03, 5 May 2006 (EDT)



== Cambodia test? ==
The FAQ mentions Cambodia twice. Can you link to more information about the pilot
in Cambodia? Or provide details about it in the FAQ? When? How many devices? What hardware?
What ages? What type of network access? What software was used? What operating systems?

== *BSD operating systems ==
Has there been work with using any BSD operating systems on the hardware? journaling flash
file system for any BSD?




== How will these socieites will be impacted ==

How will the poorest socieites in the world will be impacted by a sudden injection of technology on this scale? This is a critical question that needs much deeper answers than this FAQ has given. I've added [http://www.everythingisok.org/archives/20051220/66/100-questions some necessary questions] to dig deeper:

* How will the success of the project be gauged?
* How much research has been conducted on how the societies will be impacted?
* How will family, community, and religious structures that have existed for generations be impacted?
* How will the project affect relationships between generations or traditional social structures based on age?
[[User:Everythingisok|Everythingisok]] 11:21, 25 May 2006 (EDT)


==Does anyone remember the Cybiko?==

I made a quick page about it, [[Cybiko]], and I can add more if anyone wants to know. This was back in 2001 that I spent 24/7/365 working with the device over RS-232. http://wiki.laptop.org/index.php/Cybiko

:I added [[cybiko]] to the similar projects catagory in the [[software]] page. --[[User:Stranger|Stranger]] 00:00, 14 June 2006 (EDT)



== What software will be used with the $100 laptop? ==

* (User-contributed) - [[PuppyLinux]] is one open-source project very much suited to the OLPC machine. Its creator and lead developer is an Australian professor, Barry Kauler, bkauler at goosee dot com.

== FAQ from Teachers ==
I was talking with some teachers in Laos about this project.
Here the FAQ from teachers [[OLPC_Laos]].



==Are there efforts to make olpc an international organisation?==
At the moment olpc is an american based non profit organisation.
The develpment of the $100 laptop hardware design was an excellent work!
But isn't it time now to make this a more international movement?

*The open source community is called "External Developers".
*Some countries are not able to take part in olpc because they fear the american influence.
*The Boss of the United Nations traditionaly is from Africa and is black - couldn't olpc do the same?



==Is it possible to add a pen input interface (e.g. touchsreen) for OLPC Laptop?==
If OLPC Laptop has the pen input interface, it will be a good start point for the R&D of the handwirting recognition in the open source community and good for children in the furture.
:We are working on two tracks: a tocuh interface for the screen and dual-mode trackpad that is capacitive (finger) in the center and resistive (stylus) across the length of the keyboard. Not sure which will work, but we will make every effort. [[User:Walter|Walter]] 23:39, 8 June 2006 (EDT)


=="Not a laptop project, but an education project"==
I'm a little confused. Sometimes olpc is called an education project.
If it is an education project then the hardware and the operating system are only small parts of the project.
The page [[Predecessors_of_OLPC]] has changing content because people don't know what olpc really is.

There is no problem if olpc "only" makes the hardware, system software and software development tools.
This is good enough for a Nobel prize.

People should know what olpc is working on and what other organizations should do.
99% of the information in this wiki is about technology.
There are some really good contributions like [[Talk:Localization_Common_Room]].
To understand different cultures is very important for this project but
I can't see any efforts in that direction.

If olpc is an education project then use this education platform to learn something about
other cultures. "Eat your own dogfood" [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eat_your_own_dogfood] - that makes a project successful.

If this learning platform should support children in learning to write - test your platform and learn Thai, Chinese or
a language from the Indian subcontinent.
(grammar and spelling corrections are welcome)
--[[User:Bz|Bz]] 12:55, 10 June 2006 (EDT)

== Campaigns for OLPC laptops for Laos and Ethiopia==

There are people enthusiastically putting forward cases for Laos and Ethiopia. What information does the OLPC management need presented to it in order for a case to succeed? How will their cases be assessed please?

:We are in the process of putting together an RFP as a mechanism for countries to get involved in the project. As the details as worked out, we'll post them on this page: [[How can my country get involved]]?. [[User:Walter|Walter]] 16:49, 13 June 2006 (EDT)

==Klik==

In the [[Software Ideas - System Software]] page is the following.

''Should there be an easy way to install and remove applications from the device without corrupting the system image? I am thinking of something like klik (http://klik.atekon.de/). -- [[User:DPalmerJr|DPalmerJr]]''

''-> An initial proposal and a proof-of-concept demo is [http://klik.atekon.de/wiki/index.php/OLPC here]. -- [[User:Probono|Probono]]''

There appears elsewhere in this wiki.laptop.org wiki discussion of which linux implementation is to be used on the OLPC laptop.

Is the decision of whether to use the klik system a decision which is independent of which linux implementation is used on the OLPC laptop?

Is the decision of whether to use the klik system a decision for the OLPC management or is klik in effect at an application program level such that any individual OLPC laptop could use or not use the klik system depending upon the choice of the owner of the particular laptop?

=Answered Questions=
These questions will under go revisions to improve quality and will then be added to the main FAQ. In addition the decision will have to be made whether it is better to include the response in the answer part of another question rather then adding an entire new question.

==The computer is a really good idea - MAKE US PAY==
I wish, please do they sold in every high developed countrys - FOR 150.- Dollar! (To elemantary schools etc. its a perfect machine.) And then you can go down with the price for poor countrys about 50.-$, better!

I'd just like to add that, as a British university student, I would personally pay up to maybe £250 ($300 - $350 USD?) to have one of these for myself, and would be happy to spend a good £50-100 extra on top of this as long as I knew that ALL the money I spent was going to help lower the costs of distributing these in schools around the world. Portable, durable, reliable, small, Linux (I'm assuming this version is user-friendly?), lots of USB ports, no higher spec than is neccessary, the sort of thing I could take everywhere I go without worry, and it has a crank handle (absolute genius!!!) - it's perfect!

Seriously, assuming there's no compatibility issues with office software, it's the perfect student machine: Overcharge us (comparatively) rich folk to hell and back, sell only direct via a website, get college/university-based voluntary organisations (in Britain, go via student unions and computing services) to distribute your publicity for you for experience (i.e. free), and use proceeds to extend the project. I know I'd be perfectly happy to help out and to pay a (modest) premium as long as it was clearly accountable and untainted by profiteering or dodgy dealing - i.e. that 100% of the proceeds went straight back into the project. Have an unemployed/state-benefits price ($180?), a full-time student price ($350?) and a waged price ($500? e.g. for technophobic writers, journalists, academics etc?).

There's a hell of a lot of people who want nothing more than a simple, portable, reliable typing machine with USB and optional internet, and who'd be happy to pay extra for a good cause and a guarentee that they weren't being ripped off by something badly made. Unlike every other computer manufacturer in the world you satisfy all of these criteria. It'd be a very simple way to modestly boost fundraising and awareness. Plus it'd make people like me very happy!
: Nice :-)

::Make it with a different color case(grey) and stamp a logo and message into the cover (like Apple does in their laptops). The message would say "I donated to the OLPC project". This way you prevent the real units being diverted into the 1st world retail stream.

Totally agree. 4 good reasons to let everybody to buy it :
# I'm a software developper and I'm very interrested to pay twice the price for a OLPC laptop. Then I could easily create and test software that works well on it.
# The twice of the target price is not so high compared to many "test computers" and still can give financial support to the project.
# Another interresting border effect is that a critical mass is reached faster. The scale that permit a production/shipping price under the target price.
# I'm interrested to buy this kind of educationnal tool for my own children. This is more interresting than a game console but not more expensive. More, this is a good platform for educationnal games.
:: ''(KEF, Belgium)''

:::: Gooda agree with that - the thing is cute enough, light enough - eco-friendly enough, etc, etc - Americans will pay $300 or $400 for these things - so "Buy one - get two others for <country of your choice> free" would be a great way to get them 'out there'. Furthermore - you know that the more educated geeks have these things - the more clever software will be written for them - and the more you sell, the lower the price. Heck - put up a pre-order form and you'll get my $400 today. I'm off to read more technical specs. ''SteveBaker - Texas, USA''

:: Personally i'm from the New England area in the United States. There is obviously a lot of interest in other countries. I think you should really try and get some serious publicity in the USA. Like the person above me said "Buy one give 2 others for country of their choice". There are already products that do that except maybe to save the rainforest (not the highest priorty in most americans day). But something like this would peak Interest. Hey a product that will work great, last me through college and after, and hey i'm giving the oportunity for 2 other people somewhere in the world to a have a better education. Personally I hope there will be some work being done in the USA. I'd be the first to sign un in this area. But definatly don't leave it up to the government in USA to buy these (have you seen what they do with their money). But look into how "Calcuscribes" sell their product. I believe they cost 150 dollars a piece and its hardly a computer at all. If anyone wishes to speak with me about this e-mail me at "lilchris173@yahoo.com".


Frankly i disagree. First world countries have no direct need instead should be motivated to fund this milestone project. I could see however how certain small and special project in the US could also make use of this laptop however there should be a consistency in the target group that the cannot afford the laptop. In fact otherwise IF THERE ARE HUGE FINANCIAL DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE PEOPLE OF a school, student class it SHOULD be the duty of the country, ministry of education to even out this status for the sake of education and therefore economy (which is all that matters for a country in an abstract sense)


== Would optional sound capabilities lower the price? ==
I wonder if the sound capabilities are really necessary, an option would be to leave them out to lower the price of the basic PC, and produce an optional USB device for sound capabilities for those that need it (blind people, analphabets learning to read, etc.). --[[User:Dagoflores|Dagoflores]] 01:04, 17 March 2006 (EST)

:: The sound card can also do modem. A modem can attach to radio and phone lines, that gives you the internet. [[User:62.252.0.11|62.252.0.11]] 10:12, 18 March 2006 (EST)

::Music is fundumental and will not be compromised. We will have sound. Also the microphone input can be used for sensor input. Finally, a modem is of little use without a phone. [[User:Walter|Walter]] 10:56, 26 May 2006 (EDT)


== Will the display be able to rotate orientation?? ==
I visualize a display with the ability to switch orientation, from a horizontal (traditional PC) display for work with width needs, such as Internet pages, into a vertical (book page format) for reading e-books, with the lines running vertically, hopefully in two columns of text, (which has been demostrated to be easier to read, and to add graphics into it at one column width). --[[User:Dagoflores|Dagoflores]] 00:54, 17 March 2006 (EST)
Answer: ____ not yet. --[[User:Dagoflores|Dagoflores]] 13:48, 23 March 2006 (EST)

::yes [[User:Walter|Walter]] 11:00, 26 May 2006 (EDT)


== Is there any work has been done for the making of e-Textbook? ==

One original goal of the OLPC is to use laptop to replace conventional textbooks. There is no much time left before the first release of OLPC laptops to these 7 developing countries in early 2007. The content of textbook is a very political thing and the making of the e-Textbooks could also not be a simple work. So it could be a very urgent and serious problem for the OLPC task.

:There is work going on in the various launch countries (and elsewhere) on electronic text books. There are also several efforts to build textbooks as resources under a Creative Commons license. However, OLPC itself will not be creating any text books. [[User:Walter|Walter]] 09:52, 12 June 2006 (EDT)
:: We should have a page for [[Electronic Textbook Projects]].

== Wording ==
Are "OLPC" and the "$100 Computer" the same?
:No. One Laptop per Child (OLPC) is the name of a non-profit association whose mission is to provide a laptop computer for every child as "both a window and a tool: a window into the world and a tool with which to think." The $100 Computer (or Laptop) is the machine we are developing towards the realization of this mission. [[User:Walter|Walter]] 15:35, 4 June 2006 (EDT)


== Inclusion of BASIC / easy to learn programming? ==

The inclusion of BASIC in the early home computers in the west created a generation of children who could program, many of whom turned into professional programmers. The UK IT industry for one owes a lot to these early home computers. Will a language, such as BASIC, be included with these laptops? - Dan Huby, dan at huby dot me dot uk.

:We will ship with at least three "Turing machines": Python, Javascript, and Logo. [[User:Walter|Walter]] 14:44, 24 May 2006 (EDT)

== Could you get the next generation off of staggered QWERTY keyboards? ==
:QWERTY keyboards are only used in countries with a Latin-based alphabet. Many of the target countries will not use QWERTY because they have a totally different writing system.

First, congratulations! This is a wonderful project that plenty of folks said couldn't be done.

Since your targetted users have no investment in the legacy typewriter keyboard, I really wish you could take this opportunity to move the world off of the darned things.

:Many of the target countries '''DO''' have a substantial investment in their existing typewriter keyboard layouts.

Could you provide a keyboard with the keys arranged in columns, with a more sensible layout as the default?

:Can you cite any studies that demonstrate columnar arrngements to be superior to staggered arrangements. I suspect that staggered arrangements are better for fast typists.

SHIFT and BACKSPACE under the thumbs somehow instead of the pinkies? Seems like this is the *ideal* opportunity to get a new generation of users onto a better typing foundation -- faster learning, faster typing, fewer errors, less stress on the tendons, etc. Your volumes are such that the development of inexpensive keyboards that match your design would be inevitable.

Getting the next generation of users on a decent keyboard would do the world a big favor (to add to the HUGE favor you are already doing it!). If there are extra one-time engineering costs associated with doing the right thing keyboard-wise, I would personally contribute $100 toward them -- and I'll bet lots of other people would do the same.

:You misunderstand the goals of the OLPC and the customers. The goal is to educate children but the customers are national Ministries of Education. It is up to them to choose the keyboard layout.

==Where is the website that's already selling the 1st Gen OLPC?==
'Others have already started a website that sells our laptop for $300, so the balance of money can be used to support the poorest children.'

Where is this website? It might be good to have a link so interested parties can sign up. -[[User:206.58.200.30|206.58.200.30]] 19:35, 12 February 2006 (EST)

http://www.pledgebank.com/100laptop [[User:Foneros|Foneros]] 11:33, 25 May 2006 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 01:34, 17 December 2009

Redirect to:

Retrieved from "http://wiki.laptop.org/mediawiki/index.php?title=Ask_OLPC_a_Question/archive/Q1_2006&oldid=227626"