Discussions NL: Difference between revisions

From OLPC
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 10: Line 10:




== more meeting ==
== more meetings ==




== forum / closed wiki ==
== forum / closed wiki ==


== how to make group discissions ==

Marten: I think Jakarta voting (see google and [[ http://wcc2007.wifisoft.org/trac/wiki/rules | wcc 2007]])


This means that you get involved and ask others to support it. This can be passive or active. The purpose is getting commitment for support and make sure you are doing the right thing.

Posible votes:
* -1 bad don't do this, I will come with other proposal in 24 hours
* -0 not good a idea, not supporting
* +0 good idea, not supporting,
* +1 yes, I will support / help cover damage / take responsibility

Who can vote? Everybody in the group.

Or others can vote against it and commit themselves to another solution.

While doing a proposal it is wise to: - make a clear proposal - set a time window (voting closes on [time, date]) - send your conclusion afterwards to the list.

Proposals with 3 positive votes (sum of all) on closing time, are OK'ed and allowed to go through.

Revision as of 23:39, 20 February 2008

opencontent

other hardware

Marten: EEE rock's, but will sugar work on it ?

foundation

more meetings

forum / closed wiki

how to make group discissions

Marten: I think Jakarta voting (see google and [[ http://wcc2007.wifisoft.org/trac/wiki/rules | wcc 2007]])


This means that you get involved and ask others to support it. This can be passive or active. The purpose is getting commitment for support and make sure you are doing the right thing.

Posible votes:

   * -1 bad don't do this, I will come with other proposal in 24 hours
   * -0 not good a idea, not supporting
   * +0 good idea, not supporting,
   * +1 yes, I will support / help cover damage / take responsibility 

Who can vote? Everybody in the group.

Or others can vote against it and commit themselves to another solution.

While doing a proposal it is wise to: - make a clear proposal - set a time window (voting closes on [time, date]) - send your conclusion afterwards to the list.

Proposals with 3 positive votes (sum of all) on closing time, are OK'ed and allowed to go through.