MediaWiki talk:Sidebar: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Consider moving the current [[Content|'Content-url|Content']] to the 'about olpc' box and call it 'Content principles' or similar, and then have a new Content link that goes to the [[Category:Content]] page (or a prettified version of it) or an expansion of or enhancement to the [[Template:Content-nav]] table that provides links to the major content project pages. |
Consider moving the current [[Content|'Content-url|Content']] to the 'about olpc' box and call it 'Content principles' or similar, and then have a new Content link that goes to the [[:Category:Content]] page (or a prettified version of it) or an expansion of or enhancement to the [[Template:Content-nav]] table that provides links to the major content project pages. |
||
You may eventually need to use a collapsing table to satisfy all the demand for sidebar billing. --[[User:FGrose|FGrose]] 14:18, 26 February 2008 (EST) |
You may eventually need to use a collapsing table to satisfy all the demand for sidebar billing. --[[User:FGrose|FGrose]] 14:18, 26 February 2008 (EST) |
||
Revision as of 19:19, 26 February 2008
Some discussions to date about the sidebar:
- How to limit the number of fields
- Where to put the search bar
- Whether "Email and IRC" should be one link or two
- Where to put a help link for using the wiki
Consider moving the current 'Content-url|Content' to the 'about olpc' box and call it 'Content principles' or similar, and then have a new Content link that goes to the Category:Content page (or a prettified version of it) or an expansion of or enhancement to the Template:Content-nav table that provides links to the major content project pages.
You may eventually need to use a collapsing table to satisfy all the demand for sidebar billing. --FGrose 14:18, 26 February 2008 (EST)
The Health project needs a link on the side toolbar (left). I think since it is a project, it could perhaps come under the Projects category. What does everyone else think? --Arjs 13:24, 26 February 2008 (EST)