Talk:Olpcfs: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
If you haven't already, consider taking a look at the Linux version of Venti as well, it is available in the plan 9 from user space suite: http://swtch.com/plan9 |
If you haven't already, consider taking a look at the Linux version of Venti as well, it is available in the plan 9 from user space suite: http://swtch.com/plan9 |
||
Also consider using 9P instead of FUSE as it can give you implicit distributed file system capabilities -[[User:Ericvh|Ericvh]] 15:34, 21 March 2008 (EDT) |
Also consider using 9P instead of FUSE as it can give you implicit distributed file system capabilities -[[User:Ericvh|Ericvh]] 15:34, 21 March 2008 (EDT) |
||
In order to guard against database corruption, I suggest that any important file attributed be stored as xattrs on the file (in addition to within the index). Whether the file is a landmark version and maybe MIME type is important. Preview is not important. Tags might be important. [[User:Jpritikin|Jpritikin]] 10:12, 29 April 2008 (EDT) |
|||
Revision as of 14:12, 29 April 2008
If you haven't already, consider taking a look at the Linux version of Venti as well, it is available in the plan 9 from user space suite: http://swtch.com/plan9 Also consider using 9P instead of FUSE as it can give you implicit distributed file system capabilities -Ericvh 15:34, 21 March 2008 (EDT)
In order to guard against database corruption, I suggest that any important file attributed be stored as xattrs on the file (in addition to within the index). Whether the file is a landmark version and maybe MIME type is important. Preview is not important. Tags might be important. Jpritikin 10:12, 29 April 2008 (EDT)