Talk:Wordsmith(scrabble): Difference between revisions
(extensibility...) |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
[[User:Homunq|Homunq]] 19:12, 28 March 2008 (EDT) |
[[User:Homunq|Homunq]] 19:12, 28 March 2008 (EDT) |
||
===Ofcourse...=== |
|||
I totally agree with you. Contributing upstream is essential for an Open Source project to suceed.<br> |
|||
On the same note, my game would really stress pygame wrapper which i think, isn't quite mature enough. So, i had thought that while developing the game, if i found something amiss, or not functioning properly, i would dive deeper and produce a solution. I think this is the best way for upstream contributions. |
|||
[[User:AdityaV | Aditya]] |
|||
Revision as of 16:33, 31 March 2008
I would love to hear any feedback and comments. Do put them up here.
extensibility...
Just one more game (even a cool one) is not as good as helping to build something that can be added-on-to to make further games. In this case, there are plenty of other word games which might benefit from a fast word-search algorithm, and you should do any necessary improvements to networking, etc. "upstream" in pygame.
Just a thought.
Homunq 19:12, 28 March 2008 (EDT)
Ofcourse...
I totally agree with you. Contributing upstream is essential for an Open Source project to suceed.
On the same note, my game would really stress pygame wrapper which i think, isn't quite mature enough. So, i had thought that while developing the game, if i found something amiss, or not functioning properly, i would dive deeper and produce a solution. I think this is the best way for upstream contributions.
Aditya