Talk:Network principles: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Incorporate mstone's suggestion.) |
(suggestion 1) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I think it is very important to emphasize that relying on IPv4 or IPv6 routability means that deployments can improve network conditions independent of changes to the software on the XO. --[[User:Mstone|Michael Stone]] 15:47, 28 April 2008 (EDT) |
I think it is very important to emphasize that relying on IPv4 or IPv6 routability means that deployments can improve network conditions independent of changes to the software on the XO. --[[User:Mstone|Michael Stone]] 15:47, 28 April 2008 (EDT) |
||
: Added, thanks. [[User:CScott|CScott]] 17:40, 28 April 2008 (EDT) |
: Added, thanks. [[User:CScott|CScott]] 17:40, 28 April 2008 (EDT) |
||
== suggestion 1 == |
|||
I believe that the term "strangers" better describes what you mean by "fake friends"; the latter incorporates a sense of "deception" where someone pretends to be a friend. Instead you probably refer to users that happen to be physically around and I would assume those to be plain strangers, unless otherwise decided by the user. |
|||
Revision as of 04:25, 29 April 2008
I think it is very important to emphasize that relying on IPv4 or IPv6 routability means that deployments can improve network conditions independent of changes to the software on the XO. --Michael Stone 15:47, 28 April 2008 (EDT)
- Added, thanks. CScott 17:40, 28 April 2008 (EDT)
suggestion 1
I believe that the term "strangers" better describes what you mean by "fake friends"; the latter incorporates a sense of "deception" where someone pretends to be a friend. Instead you probably refer to users that happen to be physically around and I would assume those to be plain strangers, unless otherwise decided by the user.