Talk:Development issues: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 02:48, 10 March 2006

Any plans to use any of the "low memory footprint" C libraries (uClibC, etc.)? --pdinoto

Don't think so: I18N and compatibility says otherwise. I think there are better places to go hunting. - jg

Revision as of 01:45, 10 March 2006 (view source) Pdinoto (talk \| contribs) No edit summary		Revision as of 02:48, 10 March 2006 (view source) Jg (talk \| contribs) No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Any plans to use any of the "low memory footprint" C libraries (uClibC, etc.)? --pdinoto		Any plans to use any of the "low memory footprint" C libraries (uClibC, etc.)? --pdinoto

			Don't think so: I18N and compatibility says otherwise. I think there are better places to go hunting. - jg