OLPC Human Interface Guidelines

  This page is monitored by the OLPC team.

Introduction

Who Should Read This Document

These guidelines are targeted primarily at developers who are building tools for the OLPC laptop. They provide an in-depth view of the various features of Sugar, the laptop user interface, and focus closely on the parts of the UI that pertain directly to software development and the ways in which applications, embedded into "activities," interact with the operating system.

However, as these guidelines are intended to provide a comprehensive overview of the user interface, these pages should also be of general interest. Hopefully the descriptions of the various UI elements, particularly in the Laptop Experience section, will quench the thirst of all who want to better understand the project and its goals.

How to Read This Document

Undoubtedly, many who have made it to this page have read at least one set of human-interface guidelines in the past. Nonetheless, we strongly request that you read the content of this document in full. Many of the terms contained within will be quite familiar to you, however, we urge you to review them anyway, since our approach to the user experience shifts away from the traditional desktop. As such, this document may introduce some unfamiliar ideas around such otherwise familiar terms that you should consider throughout development.

While we would urge you to read this document once from start to finish, extensive use of both internal and external hyperlinking allows you to peruse its contents at will. Hopefully this will make revisiting particular parts of the guidelines quick and easy, and will allow you to move naturally through the details that pertain most to you. Additionally, where relevant we have included links to the APIs in order to make the relationship between design and implementation clearer. Please take advantage of this as you develop for the laptops.

Core Ideas

Activities, Not Applications

Though it might take a little while to get used to, there are no software applications in the traditional sense on the laptop. The laptop user focuses around "activities." This is more than a new naming convention; it represents the intrinsic quality of the learning experience we hope the children will have when using the laptop. Activities are distinct from applications in their foci—collaboration and expression—and their implementation—journaling and iteration.

Presence is Always Present

Everyone has the potential of being both a learner and a teacher. We have chosen to put collaboration at the core of the user experience in order realize this potential. The omnipresence of members of the learning community will facilitate children in taking responsibility for one another's learning as well as their own. The exchange of ideas amongst peers can both make the learning process more engaging and also stimulates critical thinking skills. We hope to encourage this type of social interaction with the laptops.

In order to facilitate a collaborative learning environment, the laptops employ a mesh network that interconnects all laptops within range. By exploiting this connectivity, every activity has the potential to be a networked activity. We aspire that all activities take advantage of the mesh; any activity that is not mesh-aware should perhaps be rethought in light of connectivity. As an example, consider the web-browsing activity bundled with the laptop distribution. Normally one browses in isolation, perhaps on occasion sending a friend a favorite link. On the laptop, however, a link-sharing feature integrated into the browser activity transfors the solitary act of web-surfing into a group collaboration. Where possible, all activities should embrace the mesh and place strong focus on facilitating such collaborative processes.

Tools of Expression

Starting from the premise that we want to make use of what people already know in order to make connections to new knowledge, our approach focuses on thinking, expressing, and communicating with technology. The laptop is a "thing to think with"; we hope to make the primary activity of the children one of creative expression, in whatever form that might take. Thus, most activities will focus on the creation of some type of object, be it a drawing, a song, a story, a game, or a program. In another shift in the language used to describe the user experience, we refer to objects rather than files as the primary stuff of creative expression.

As most software developers would agree, the best way to learn how to write a program is to write one, or perhaps teach someone else how to do so; studying the syntax of the language might be useful, but it doesn't teach one how to code. We hope to apply this principal of "learn through doing" to all types of creation, e.g., we emphasis composing music over downloading music. We also encourage the children to engage in the process of collaborative critique of their expressions and to iterate upon their expression through a process of debugging.

The objectification of the traditional filesystem speaks more directly to real-world metaphors: instead of a sound file, we have an actual sound; instead of a text file, a story. In order to support this concept, activity developers may define object types and associated icons to represent them.

Journaling

The concept of the journal, a written documentation of everyday events, is generally understood, albeit in various forms across cultures. A journal typically chronicles the activities one has done throughout the day. We have chosen to adopt a journaling metaphor for the filesystem as our basic approach to file organization. While the underlying impementation of such a filesystem doe not differ significantly from some of those in contemporary operating systems, it also holds less importance than the journal abstraction itself.

At its core, our journal concept embodies the idea that the filesystem records a history of the things you've done, or, more specifically, the activities you've participated in. Its function as the store of the objects created while performing those activities is secondary, although also important. The journal naturally lends itself to a chronological organization (although it can be tagged, searched, and sorted by a variety of means). As a record of things you've done—not just the things you've saved—the journal will read much like a portfolio or scrapbook history of the children's interactions with their machine and also with thier peers. The journal combines entries explicitly created by the children with those which are implicitly created through participation in activities; developers must think carefully about how an activity integrates with the journal more so than with a traditional filesystem that functions independently of an application. The activities, the objects, and the means of recording all tightly integrate to create a different kind of computer experience.

Design Fundamentals

Know Your Audience

Inexperienced

The goal of OLPC is to provide children with new opportunities to explore, experiment, and express themselves. Many children in need of such opportunities have previously had little or no access to computing, and so will be unfamiliar with the laptop and how to interact with it. This will undoubtedly have effects on some aspects of activity development. On the one hand, it means that developers must focus energy into making interfaces discoverable, wholly intuitive, and building metaphors that strengthen and clarify the interface. On the other hand, since the laptop will the be the first experience of computing for many children, activities do not have to be overly true to legacy behaviors or expectations. This frees developers to innovate.

Young

Many of the children who will receive laptops are just entering kindergarten. Others will be in their young teenage years. Therefore, it is important to develop activities in ways that scale across age levels.

International

The OLPC initiative, by its nature, requires international involvement and participation. Developers must keep in mind the broad range of cultures and languages that the laptops must transcend. In particular, activities should not depend on western icons and modes of thinking, but should abstract ideas to a level that would be familiar to humankind in general, where possible. For instace, consider the camera button on the keyboard. Though one might be inclined to label this key with a small image of a camera and lens, the eye graphic speaks directly to our human capacity for vision, providing a cross-cultural icon that represents the compute's ability to capture what it sees.

Key Design Principles

Low floor, no ceiling.

Performance

The OLPC laptop bucks the trend of "more, faster, fatter"; we aim to provide a computer tailored to the needs of children in the context of their learning, not to the needs of frentic video games or office applications. We are, however, working within constraints of componet cost, robustness, and power consumption. To satisfy these contraints, we have opted for NAND flash rather than a harddisk and a modest 128MB of memory (Please see hardware specifications). Thus developers must make every effort to write efficient code while minimizing memory usage.

Since there is no swap space on the laptop, only a limited number of activities can run concurrently; the Sugar UI exposes these details directly to the user. The home screen features an activity ring that contains icons representing each instance of an open activity. The size of the ring segment that a given activity occupies represents its overall memory usage; when the ring fills up, no additional activities may be launched until some resources are freed up. Take these limitations into account as you develop activities, since they will have a greater impact on the performance of your software on the laptop than on other platforms.

Usability

OPLC places an emphasis on discoverability and usability due to our target audience. Usability has everything to do with the actual behavior of the activities, the layout of the buttons and tools, and the feedback that the interface provides to the user through interaction. Ultimately, the design decisions that make your activities usable will depend greatly on the type of activity you are developing, and it will be up to you to consider carefully the kinds of interactions users will expect when presented with it. As a general rule, if the interface provided does what the user expects it to, you are off to a good start. However, since it is quite difficult to know what the user will expect—and in practice not all users will expect the same things—there is no substitue for user testing.

Simplicity

We designed the entire laptop interface with a goal of simplicity. It can be tempting—and also quite easy—to add an overabundance of features to software: the abundance of MIPs and memory exacerbate the software-bloat phenomenon. The laptop hardware "limitations" lead toward a more concise direction and aid in designing for simplicity.

Keep in mind that simple doesn't necessarily mean limited. OLPC hopes to demostrate to the world that simple—even minimal—controls can have great expressive power. Avoid bloated interfaces that do too much, and limit the controls to those immediately relevant to the task at hand. Rather than creating a "Swiss Army knife" of an activity, think of the laptop itself as the knife, and instead develop a particular tool for that knife that does one thing, and does it very well. When all the activities on the laptop embrace this idea, the true power of the laptop will emerge.

Reliability

Of course we want to avoid instances where things go wrong; this should be a goal for every piece of software. We are committed to ensuring that the UI framework prevents activities from causing system crashes; Developers should consider a "fail-soft" approach to their designs, such as incorporating a suitable behavior for the spontaneous termination of an activity.

Adaptabilty

With the aforementioned goal of reliability and the omnipresent mesh network in mind, adaptability must be carefully considered. Many activities will involve participation from a locally networked group of friends. The mesh network provides an excellent tool for connectivity and collaborative creation even without an internet access point, and is extremely adaptable in itself due to the nature of such a network. However, this also means that signal strengths, and therefore bandwidth, may fluctuate, and at times activity partipants may even drop off temporarily. Activities should handle these cases with care. Temporary loss of connectivity should be handled silently, and reconnection of an individual to an activity they were previously participating in should happen with no noticeable side-effects. On the other hand, unintentional disconnection of individuals from networked activities due to unforseen reasons should likewise be handled in the simplest way at both ends of the connection. Detailed guidelines for collaborative activities reside in the Laptop Experience section.

Of course, though network adaptability is of utmost importance, other forms of adptability should also make thier way into activities. For instance, activities should have the ability to accept forms of user input that may not match the develper's expectations. In the end, writing adaptable code will do a good deal for making the code reliable.

Transparency

OLPC also hopes to encourage the children using the laptops to explore the the technology under the surface. Towards this end, a view source key has been added to the laptop keyboards, providing them with instant access to the code that enables the activities that they use from day to day. This key will allow those interested to peel away layers of abstraction, digging deeper into the codebase as they learn.

To enable such layered exploration, OLPC has written much of what can be in Python, a scripting language, to enable children to view the source code. This means, aside from general good practice, code should be both readable and well commented. The [PEP 8] style guidelines for Python provide an excellent resource, and OLPC recommends that developers follow the practices layed out therein unless a compelling reason not to exists.

The Laptop Experience

Introduction

As you begin developing activities, it is help to understand OLPC's goals for the laptops, as well as the metaphors and interactions we are using. We hope this overview will provide insight into the ways in which activities can integrate smoothly with the operating system and, just as importantly, with other activities and other laptops on the mesh network.

Most developers are familiar with the desktop metaphor that dominates the modern-day computer experience. This metaphor has evolved over the past 30 years, giving rise to distinct classes of interface elements that we expect to find in every OS: desktop, icons, files, folders, windows, etc. While this metaphor makes sense at the office—and perhaps even at home—it does not translate well into a collaborative environment such as the one that the OLPC laptops will embody. Therefore, we have adopted a new set of metaphors that emphasize community. While there are some correlations between the Sugar UI and those of traditional desktops, there are also clear distinctions. It is these distinctions that are the subject of the remainder of this section. We highlight the reasoning behind our shift in perspective and detail functionality with respect to the overall laptop experience.

• Desktop : Neighborhood
• Menubar : The Frame
• Hierarchical Filesystem : Journal
• Applications : Activities
• Files : Objects

Zoom Metaphor

Four distinct zoom levels define the laptop: Neighborhood, Friends, Home, and Activity

With the mesh network a permanent fixture of every laptop, the OS interface aims to accurately represent this local community. In order to do so, a zoom metaphor defines four discrete views, each of which caters to a particular set of goals: Home, Friends, Neighborhood, and Activity. Using keyboard shortcuts or controls built into the software, one may zoom in and out along the axis defined in the figure to the left, adjusting accordingly the level of detail presented on screen at any given time.

Home

Home view

Of all the zoom levels, the Home view relates most closely to the traditional desktop. As the first screen presented to the user at startup, it serves as a starting point for the exploration of both the mesh network and also of their personal activities and objects. From this view, one may either back up first to a circle of Friends, and beyond that to a view of the entire mesh Neighborhood, or, instead, zoom in to focus on a particular Activity.

The Home view interface is minimal. In the center of the screen, the XO icon—rendered in user-specified colors—represents the child to whom the laptop belongs. The activity ring surrounds the character, indicating all of the currently open activities. Furthermore, the section of the ring that a given activity occupies directly represents the amount of memory that the particular activity requires to run, providing immediate visual feedback about memory contstraints and exposing a means for the user to manage their resources. Most activity management happens here: starting new private activities, ending current activities, and switching the currently active activity.

When used in conjunction with the Bulletin-Board, the Home view becomes the most direct correlate to a typical PC desktop: as a place for keeping things handy: tomorrow's homework, the drawing I'm working on, a favorite song, a reminder to myself to take out the trash.

Friends

Friends view

The Friends view takes a small step back from the Home space, opening up the screen to include one's circle of friends. Essentially, this view represents a spatially viewable and editable buddy list. From here one can add or remove friends, and I can also move individuals around, perhaps forming them into logical groups - the four in the lower left corner, for instance, might be my story group. All of my friends receive invitations whenever I start an activity from the Friends view, making collaboration implicit. Moreover, this view allows me to see what activities my friends are presently engaged in, providing the opportunity to join any non-private activities. Already, you can see how this view fundamentally changes the traditional application launch, allowing us to start new networked activities or join existing ones directly through the OS.

Neighborhood

Neighborhood view

Zooming out one more step we reach the Neighborhood View, which may be the truest embodiment of the fundamental idea behind the OLPC program. Here we see everyone on the local mesh. However, at this level we are less concerned with the individuals themselves as with the activities they are presently engaged in within the mesh Neighborhood. For this reason, individuals cluster around their active activities in this view, providing a direct visual representation of the number of activities available as well as indicating their popularity, since group size is immediately perceptible.

This means that, while the Neighborhood view doesn't provide any true spacial or geogpraphical data, it does provide an at-a-glace social geography of the mesh and its participants. Similar to the Friends view, launching an activity here implicitly opens that activity up for anyone in the Neighborhood to join. While no one receives an explicit invitation in this case, the newly started activity will appear in the view, with its participants clustered about it, so that anyone who wishes to may join. Of course, this also means that the Neighborhood provides an excellent space for exploration. Here, one can both search for, locate and join activities of interest using a powerful and adaptable search technology, and also interact with and make friends with other children in their neighborhood they haven't yet met.

Activity

Moving in the other direction from the Home view, we find the Activity view. This view contains the heart of the laptops: the activities where all of the actual creation, exploration, and collaboration takes place. This is where you, the develper, come into play, providing new and engaging tools that take advantage of the features present in the hardware and in the rest of the interface, extending the functionality and encouraging new types of creative exploration.

Though multitasking has become somewhat of a standard in today's desktop computing world, we've chosen to shift away from this model, instead adopting a fullscreen activity view that focuses the childrens' energies on one specific task at a time. Though one may have several activities open in the activity ring at any given moment, only one can be denoted as the active activity. Several factors contributed to this decision. First, though the laptops have an extremely high resolution 200dpi display, the actual viewing area remains quite small, leaving little room for multiple activities on the screen. Additionally, as noted, it naturally focuses efforts on a specific task, which tends to work better in a learning environment.

For extensive detail on the various aspects of the activity interface and their design guidelines, see the Activities section.

The Frame

The frame

Always on the Periphery

Glancing at the previous screenshots, you might have noted the absence of a "menubar" or other form of persistent interface element such as those we're used to. Again, due to limitations in the actual viewing size of the screen, such a persistent element drastically reduces the actual creation-space, which OLPC maintains high regard for. However, similar ideas led to the concept of a Frame, always on the periphery and just out of sight, which contains all of the peripheral information that one might need, regardless of the current view. Since this element persists at all zoom levels, it provides a consistent place for any interface elements which apply to all views, including search, incoming invitations and notifications, a clipboard, and buddies you're currently interacting with.

When activated, the Frame slides in atop the currently visible interface, providing access to the needed functionality, yet quickly retracting from view once the task for which it was invoked completes. Though these transitions happen quickly, a forgiveness parameter prevents unintentional Frame retraction in hopes of making interaction with this interface element completely natural.

Frame Components & Organization

At a high level, one can consider the frame in two parts: The top 3/4 of the frame represents nouns - persons, places, and things - while the bottom 1/4 represents those elements that require action - activities, invitations, and notifications. More specifcally, each edge of the frame is dedicated to one of people, places, objects, or actions.

People

People in active activity...

Places

Zoom levels, search, etc...

Objects

A clipboard...

Actions

Activities, Invitations, Notifications...

Activation Methods

As such an important interface element, the Frame will have multiple activation methods despite its peripheral funcitonality.

Hot Corners

Hot corners serve as the Frame's primary invocation method. As Fitt's Law implies, the corners are the easiest part of the screen to hit with a cursor (second only to, of course, the pixel already beneath it). Thus, moving the cursor to any corner of the screen will instantly invoke the frame. Since spatial recognition allows one to go directly to a corner adjacent to the edge containing the desired functionality, this should allow one to scroll easily along said screen edge in search of the desired element. Additionally, since newly added people, objects, and invitations all insert from the corners, the latest invitation, clipping, or other object should lie close at hand.

"Warm" edges

A newly coined term, though not a new idea, warm"edges work identically to hot corners albeit on a short delay. For the laptop interface, this means that a half-second pause precedes the activation of the frame from an edge of the screen. Additional parameters, such as a minimum cursor velocity, virtually eliminate accidental invocation, which holds extreme importance since, again by Fitt's Law, the edges of the screen provide the optimal placement for toolbar buttons and scrollbars which should extend to the very edge of the screen themselves. The ability to access the frame directly from the edges builds upon the spatial recognition concept, allowing one to jump directly to the spot where a particular element, such as the search field, resides.

Function Key

In addition to trackpad activation, the convenient information within the Frame lies just one keystroke away, thanks to a dedicated key in the upper right-hand corner of the keyboard. This key has two modes of functionality. First, momentary presses of the key act as a toggle, turning the Frame on and off with each press. Alternatively, by pressing and holding the key down, the Frame will appear on screen until release of the key. This second method provides a a quick and easy way to glance at incoming invitations or other system status elements for a brief moment, then automatically return full focus to the activity view itself.

Notification Override

Overrides for urget notifications...

The Sugar Interface

Color

The basic color scheme for the laptop is constrained by the need to work in both color (backlight mode) and grayscale (reflective mode); thus we have chosen guidelines that ensure at least some achromatic contrast under all conditions. Further, sustained legibility of text is accomplished by a combination of colors whose achromatic contrast is large and whose chromatic energy is of low to moderate level. For this reason, we are striving for achromatic contrast of at least two Munsell value steps.

The default value for the Frame is N2.5; the default value for the background is N9. Therefore, to maintain sufficient contrast, the line values for icons that appear on both the Frame and the background should range between N5 and N7. The interior fill of those icons should maintain achromatic contrast with the line value, e.g., the fill color for an icon with a line value of N5 should be either ≤N3 or ≥N7.

Fonts

Once we understand the relationship between pango.SCALE and point size, we'll have a more deterministic set of guidelines for fonts. The display is 200DPI. One point is 1/72 inch or just less than 3 pixels. Hence a 12pt font would be roughly 36 pixels. We are settling on a default size for Sugar menus (using Bitstream Vera Sans) of an 11 pixel x height; 13 pixel ascender height; and 5 pixel descender height. In terms of that that is in point size on the actual display, I'd say it is about a 9 point font (it was a 19 point font in Illustraor on the Mac). It is quite legible. We will be looking at other faces, e.g., Arabic and Thai, and also looking into a large-type version of the interface for the younger children.