Talk:Instant messaging challenges: Difference between revisions

From OLPC
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
I think that what is needed is something that will work well over a peer to peer system. Probably
I think that what is needed is something that will work well over a peer to peer system. Probably
what you want to have happen is that a person wants to orignally use a system they would have to
what you want to have happen is that a person wants to orignally use a system they would have to
connect up a centralized server. When they connect and get a userid, it would then send data back to the client of a signed digital certificate. Aka, when I sign up I would get a signed digital certificate saying that I am profdeadmeat signed by the server that we all know. Probably this should use the Jabber protocol. When we are using a regular non supported network of peer2peers then what would happen is that machines would query machines around them for instant messanging. <br />
connect up a centralized server. When they connect and get a userid, it would then send data back to the client of a signed digital certificate. Aka, when I sign up I would get a signed digital certificate saying that I am <b>profdeadmeat</b> signed by the server that we all know. Probably this should use the Jabber protocol. When we are using a regular non supported network of peer2peers then what would happen is that machines would query machines around them for instant messanging. <br />
&nbsp;&nbsp; It looks like the [http://www.zeroconf.org/ Zero Conf Group] and the [http://www.multicastdns.org/ mDNS/DNS-SD] groups may have figured parts of this out. A product that does some of what you are talking about is [http://www.apple.com/ca/macosx/features/bonjour/ Bonjour] [http://www.apple.com/ca/macosx/features/ichat/ ichat] which is Apple's name for ZeroConf does do peer2peer chatting.
&nbsp;&nbsp; It looks like the [http://www.zeroconf.org/ Zero Conf Group] and the [http://www.multicastdns.org/ mDNS/DNS-SD] groups may have figured parts of this out. A product that does some of what you are talking about is [http://www.apple.com/ca/macosx/features/bonjour/ Bonjour] [http://www.apple.com/ca/macosx/features/ichat/ ichat] which is Apple's name for ZeroConf does do peer2peer chatting.
Note: some of the above has moved to the main page if you need to speak to me contact me online
via AOL or email me via gmail to my account.

Revision as of 19:23, 17 March 2006

I think Sonork [1] would be excelent for the system. It has not only offline messaging, but offline File Transfer!

I think that what is needed is something that will work well over a peer to peer system. Probably what you want to have happen is that a person wants to orignally use a system they would have to connect up a centralized server. When they connect and get a userid, it would then send data back to the client of a signed digital certificate. Aka, when I sign up I would get a signed digital certificate saying that I am profdeadmeat signed by the server that we all know. Probably this should use the Jabber protocol. When we are using a regular non supported network of peer2peers then what would happen is that machines would query machines around them for instant messanging.
   It looks like the Zero Conf Group and the mDNS/DNS-SD groups may have figured parts of this out. A product that does some of what you are talking about is Bonjour ichat which is Apple's name for ZeroConf does do peer2peer chatting.

 Note: some of the above has moved to the main page if you need to speak to me contact me online
  via AOL or email me via gmail to my account.