Talk:OLPC myths: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
FazzMunkle (talk | contribs) |
FazzMunkle (talk | contribs) (Elaborated on the "more harm then good" myth.) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
I figured it should be elaborated on and the original dealt with two distinct issues of recycling/disposability, one possibly answering the other. I hope I kept the original spirit of the entry.--[[User:FazzMunkle|FazzMunkle]] 11:21, 21 March 2006 (EST) |
I figured it should be elaborated on and the original dealt with two distinct issues of recycling/disposability, one possibly answering the other. I hope I kept the original spirit of the entry.--[[User:FazzMunkle|FazzMunkle]] 11:21, 21 March 2006 (EST) |
||
== Elaborated on the "more harm then good" myth. == |
|||
I figured some exploration on why people think this was in order. |
|||
Revision as of 16:30, 21 March 2006
Just tightening up the wordings, clearing up potential misunderstandings and adding some entries
I added one more that I see a lot of. That of value judgements placed on this project simply because companies like Microsoft have come up with their own ideas.--FazzMunkle 14:21, 19 March 2006 (EST)
The recycling myth/misunderstanding entry
I figured it should be elaborated on and the original dealt with two distinct issues of recycling/disposability, one possibly answering the other. I hope I kept the original spirit of the entry.--FazzMunkle 11:21, 21 March 2006 (EST)
Elaborated on the "more harm then good" myth.
I figured some exploration on why people think this was in order.