Feature roadmap/General UI sluggishness: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
|Specification= |
|Specification= |
||
See previous threads on this here: <br> |
|||
http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/sugar/2008-July/007471.html <br> |
|||
Thread on SVG graphics performance here: <br> |
|||
⚫ | |||
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/2008-December/010200.html <br> |
|||
Suggestions from John Gilmore (e-mail here: http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/devel/2008-December/021595.html) <br> |
|||
* Putting a swap partition on an SD card and seeing what it does for performance |
|||
* Building an un-compressed JFFS2 filesystem (it's trivial with the tools used) and seeing what it does for performance |
|||
* Running "prelink" to avoid dirtying pages for shared libraries (reducing memory pressure) and see what it does for performance |
|||
* Working on glibc and other popular libraries in the XO to reduce their dirty memory page footprint (it's huge and doesn't need to be) |
|||
* Fixing bug #4680 in PyGTK+, which causes every multithreaded Python GTK+ program to uselessly poll ten times a second. |
|||
* Replacing Sugar with Gnome, KDE, or other GUIs and seeing what it does for performance. |
|||
Suggestions from Erikg focused on Sugar optimization: <br> |
|||
http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/sugar/2008-October/009393.html |
|||
⚫ | |||
Side by side Cairo graphics performance tests between a 2Ghz PC and XO <br> |
Side by side Cairo graphics performance tests between a 2Ghz PC and XO <br> |
||
http://screamingduck.com/Cruft/cairo_benchmark_XO.txt <br> |
http://screamingduck.com/Cruft/cairo_benchmark_XO.txt <br> |
Revision as of 16:23, 18 December 2008
Feature subcategory | Is part of::Category:Performance | |
Requesters | {{#arraymap:Uruguay, Peru|,|x|Requested by::x}} | |
Requirements | * For all of the following, the times measured should apply when the XO is connected to a wireless AP and running Write with a file of less than 1 MB. This is used as a sample "state of the machine" definition. Other definitions of state of the machine are welcome and the performance when the XO is doing more (e.g. more activities open or moving data over the Wireless) should not degrade precipitously.
| |
Specification | See previous threads on this here: http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/sugar/2008-July/007471.html Thread on SVG graphics performance here: Suggestions from John Gilmore (e-mail here: http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/devel/2008-December/021595.html)
Suggestions from Erikg focused on Sugar optimization: Test results (thanks Neil!): | |
Owners | {{#arraymap:Marco, Erik|,|x|Contact person::User:x}} | |
Priority | Priority::2 | |
Helps deployability? | Helps deployability::no | |
Target for 9.1? | Target for 9.1::no |