Talk:OLPCO2e: Difference between revisions
(summarize.) |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
It sounds like an interesting program -- how can people get involved with its development directly, other than by joining the mailing list? Are there detailed pages that need more data or other input? Are you already talking to environment grps for support? [[User:JamesK|JamesK]] |
It sounds like an interesting program -- how can people get involved with its development directly, other than by joining the mailing list? Are there detailed pages that need more data or other input? Are you already talking to environment grps for support? [[User:JamesK|JamesK]] |
||
: It was an interesting idea, but it isn't being pursued now. |
: It was an interesting idea, but it isn't being pursued now. --[[User:Sj|Sj]] [[User talk:Sj|<font style="color:#f70; font-size:70%">talk</font>]] |
||
Revision as of 09:33, 8 December 2009
cf. http://sites.google.com/site/olpco2e/ and others in that line.
Why did we opt for Google Sites, Google Calendar, Google Discussion Groups, and the other Google tools, s.a. Google Docs? OLPCO2e is going to have to do a LOT of calculations and data-input for calculating the CO2e-reductions...
I've posted a Request For comments on this topic at the Talk:Communication_channels#Advice_and_RFC_to_OLPCO2e-Entity. since OLPCO2e is a new Entity... I didn't see any harm of going that road until there is a better option/comment. :) --SvenAERTS 21:58, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
other support
It sounds like an interesting program -- how can people get involved with its development directly, other than by joining the mailing list? Are there detailed pages that need more data or other input? Are you already talking to environment grps for support? JamesK